Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Wow! This is interesting. I don’t consider this ambiguous photo posted today as any of them being finally “seen”. We still haven’t “seen” any of them since Christmas! Where the heck are they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is clearly an old photo

The article said William took it earlier in the week.

Yes, dear. “The article” said. Not “…took it earlier in the week, according to Palace sources,” or “…according to His Royal Highness.” If it is an error, it is 100% an error that can happen any day with any new source. If it were posted to Instagram and they pulled it, they should have said “was posted on Instagram earlier this week” or something. There’s no source to the “fact” that the photo was actually TAKEN in recent days.

Instagram post says <camera emoji> 2024

I like how you act like Instagram is held to the same journalistic and archival standards as, say, a legitimate newspaper, or Getty Images, or the official the BRF press offices.

oh dear. I am pointing out that there are explicit efforts made by someone acting on behalf of William and Kate to make us all believe, purport, put forth, assert what have you, that this picture was taken in the last 2 months and 10 days. I am not saying that it's true.

I think even that is a stretch. It’s a photo and caption to celebrate Mother’s Day. If my husband asked me after surgery to pose for a photo, I’d probably say no, but how about that one you took of us on [whatever day.] It’s just Instagram, so it’s not some official official palace photo release, with photographer name/date/place, with the backing of accuracy by the press office. It is just Instagram, people!

[Anonymous]

I used to wonder who was stupid enough to buy The National Enquirer. Then I came upon DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or maybe the simplest answer is the right one. She had a scheduled procedure that went as planned. She’s a wealthy woman who doesn’t actually need to work so she took ample time off to recover.

I think everyone would normally believe this, but some people close to the royals are saying that they're acting especially unusual about this.

[Anonymous]

“The image, taken by Prince William at Windsor earlier this week, shows the princess with her three children.”

I guess BBC can always backtrack and say it was their interpretation, not anything explicitly said by William, that the image was from last week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

[Anonymous]

I think she looks great. Her color is good and her face is plumped out.
I had a traumatic injury with my first birth that resulted in internal bleeding and them pumping me full of some foam that stops the bleeding and I was not standing/walking comfortably for months after. It was worse than my c-sections. So I can believe sitting awkwardly in a chair for months after whatever abdominal surgery she had. And she may be awkwardly posed because she either has a colostomy bag she is hiding or because she is wearing one of those post surgery wraps over her belly. I wouldn’t be wearing jeans but maybe they are not zipped at the top or maybe they are maternity jeans with the stretchy jersey belly.

I hope at some point she does go public about whatever it is, to give support to others suffering with it. Like Betty Ford did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or maybe the simplest answer is the right one. She had a scheduled procedure that went as planned. She’s a wealthy woman who doesn’t actually need to work so she took ample time off to recover.

I think everyone would normally believe this, but some people close to the royals are saying that they're acting especially unusual about this.

If they anticipated this months-long recovery, why schedule a trip in early-‘24, only to cancel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

[Anonymous]

Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they do something with Charlotte’s teeth. The royals do wear braces but try not to show the public. England has socialized medical and braces are considered a luxury, not supported by the average medical plan. BRF does not want to appear above the others. With Invisalign type products they can probably now have them more easily.

Have you never heard of Invisalign?

George's teeth are so perfectly straight. Maybe he has something that can be worn just at night?

Some people just have good teeth.

Ah yes! The British and their famously good teeth.

So how do you explain it? Do they wear braces and take them off every day?

[Anonymous]

Why are they celebrating Mother’s Day in March? Is that England’s date?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

they really do. I am not even one of the conspiracy people but why in the world would you release a picture that looks like this? This isn't helping at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is clearly an old photo

The article said William took it earlier in the week.

Yes, dear. “The article” said. Not “…took it earlier in the week, according to Palace sources,” or “…according to His Royal Highness.” If it is an error, it is 100% an error that can happen any day with any new source. If it were posted to Instagram and they pulled it, they should have said “was posted on Instagram earlier this week” or something. There’s no source to the “fact” that the photo was actually TAKEN in recent days.

Instagram post says <camera emoji> 2024

I like how you act like Instagram is held to the same journalistic and archival standards as, say, a legitimate newspaper, or Getty Images, or the official the BRF press offices.

oh dear. I am pointing out that there are explicit efforts made by someone acting on behalf of William and Kate to make us all believe, purport, put forth, assert what have you, that this picture was taken in the last 2 months and 10 days. I am not saying that it's true.

But her legs are rigid and place and she looks paralyzed. Or are you totally confused? Which is it?