Rose Hanbury and Prince William

[Anonymous]

I think I need to look up pics of Rose’s kids…..see if there’s any resemblance to Wills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see Rose as a not-good-enough. Not beautiful, weak chin, hasty marriage to a man who is a) gay, and b) much older than her, pregnant before marriage. Meh. If she was good enough, she'd marry a good-looking aristocrat her age, and have children two years after the wedding, as good lord intended.

She is quite unattractive. I can’t imagine William having an affair with her. But, shrug, what do I know.

Camilla was not exactly beautiful.

And Charles is handsome?

Hard no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is just social media gossip. No proof whatsoever. Leave both families alone.

I doubt their families are reading and wallowing over commoner's gossip but yeah that's how gossips spread.

Hilariously naive.

Of COURSE they know the gossip. And they try to stop it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it can be fun to gossip about famous people, I find this thread rather shrewish and sad. Not one iota evidence of an affair. Nor any evidence William is a cheater. It's strictly in your minds.

I tried saying this. They'll just ignore you like they ignored me and get right back to bizarre speculation that seems to scratch some weird itch for them.

What if…now bear with me here…not everyone agrees with you that there is “not one iota of evidence of an affair?”

What is the evidence?

This, and also, what evidence is there that this "evidence" is credible? I'm sorry, but tabloids and gossip websites are not credible sources! Face it (or don't, because again, this gossip seems to scratch some really weird itch many of you have), if you're not part of these people's private lives and they have not admitted something themselves, you really have no reliable basis for knowing anything private about them!

[Anonymous]

There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

Rose's husband had a prominent role in the coronation because he's the outgoing Lord High Something-Something who used to carry the Queen's crown into the opening of Parliament every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

Rose's husband had a prominent role in the coronation because he's the outgoing Lord High Something-Something who used to carry the Queen's crown into the opening of Parliament every year.

The husband has an important title but Rose has her own royal connection. Her grandmother was a bridesmaid in QEII’s wedding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

Rose's husband had a prominent role in the coronation because he's the outgoing Lord High Something-Something who used to carry the Queen's crown into the opening of Parliament every year.

The husband has an important title but Rose has her own royal connection. Her grandmother was a bridesmaid in QEII’s wedding.

Meh there were lots of more important people that weren’t included or highlighted the way these two were at the coronation. Camilla is quite the evil step monster.

[Anonymous]

Most of you sound nuts. You have zero idea about any of this yet you speak with such certainty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

Well body language and facial expressions say this is nonsense. Camilla and Kate exchange looks that suggest they have a close relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

Well body language and facial expressions say this is nonsense. Camilla and Kate exchange looks that suggest they have a close relationship.

Body language and facial expressions are how many of us see the problems with Kate and William. They seem to really dislike each other. Maybe that’s about Rose, maybe not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get this.

It was obvious in photos and video clips that Charles and Diana had a very strained relationship.

By contrast, William and Kate seem genuinely happy and in step with each other. Nobody can act that well if they are truly miserable.

I don’t think there was any cheating.

I have no idea what's happening in William and Catherine's relationship, but it's weird to me that people keep saying their photos make it clear how awful their relationship is. Charles and Diana were so visibly on the outs for so long that my standards may be warped; it was kind of hilarious (also sad! and also proof that the stiff upper lip is not a constant) how obvious they were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

You're just making up stuff. Kate clearly gets along with the entire BRF, even crazy Harry before he went off the rails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it can be fun to gossip about famous people, I find this thread rather shrewish and sad. Not one iota evidence of an affair. Nor any evidence William is a cheater. It's strictly in your minds.

I tried saying this. They'll just ignore you like they ignored me and get right back to bizarre speculation that seems to scratch some weird itch for them.

What if…now bear with me here…not everyone agrees with you that there is “not one iota of evidence of an affair?”

What is the evidence?

This, and also, what evidence is there that this "evidence" is credible? I'm sorry, but tabloids and gossip websites are not credible sources! Face it (or don't, because again, this gossip seems to scratch some really weird itch many of you have), if you're not part of these people's private lives and they have not admitted something themselves, you really have no reliable basis for knowing anything private about them!

You also aren’t part of their private lives lol.

What is the evidence that you would believe? A sex tape? Some sort of public admission by one of the involved parties? Charles and Camilla were having an affair before any of those things came out. As was Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez or any number of cheaters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are articles out there that Camilla is messing with Kate by being team Rose. The Hanburys were given a prominent position and later inclusion in the coronation at the insistence of Camilla. Camilla looks down on Kate because she wasn’t an aristocrat but likes Rose because she’s an affair side chick and aristocrat like herself. I think Kate puts up with a lot of garbage.

You're just making up stuff. Kate clearly gets along with the entire BRF, even crazy Harry before he went off the rails.

DP. Camilla absolutely looks down on anyone that’s not aristocratic. Camilla’s background is a core part of her self-identity. Like one of the first things she said to Charles was that her distant relative was the mistress of his distant relative. Kate’s family’s background is not aristocratic and worse yet her mom was raised in a *gasp* council property. Who knows if she’s giving Rose more prominence to bother Kate but the peerage/titles/etc is tremendously important to these people.

I don’t know what the motivation for making Rose Hanbury’s kids so prominent was. But I do think Camilla was trying to put all the other women in their place by being the only person allowed to wear a tiara (Kate’s thing was a headpiece and not a tiara) at the coronation.