What is Youngkins political future?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I remember when dems and media ruthlessly bullied Scott Walker and gop dopes in Wisconsin for the Foxconn scam. Why are libs suddenly shilling foreign giveaway scams as a good thing?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/29/after-wisconsins-foxconn-debacle-states-rethink-giant-subsidies.html


So for FoxConn Walker promised to give $3 billion in tax credits to FoxConn. Here the state has spent $200 million to attract business to a site and when it does the governor says no, I don’t like that it’s Chinese business because I’d rather have a political talking point than thousands of good paying jobs.

If you don’t see the difference you are blind/deaf/dumb.

So the only difference is amount of the subsidy? How does that make it better? $200 million is still a lot of money.

FoxConn never actually built anything.


Lol. Neither do these fake battery fronts which were all created from thin air.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


Too bad ford isn’t working with him and the plant is being built in Michigan
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:His political future is dead. He has yet to seriously address the school shooting of the 6 year old. More and more details come out and he has only said one thing which was really nothing. It's not good for the optics with the crowd he's trying to keep.

I don’t get this. Wouldn’t the parents be responsible?


Yes. Yes, they would. But the PP is a LWNJ, so there is no rational discussion to be had.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I remember when dems and media ruthlessly bullied Scott Walker and gop dopes in Wisconsin for the Foxconn scam. Why are libs suddenly shilling foreign giveaway scams as a good thing?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/29/after-wisconsins-foxconn-debacle-states-rethink-giant-subsidies.html


So for FoxConn Walker promised to give $3 billion in tax credits to FoxConn. Here the state has spent $200 million to attract business to a site and when it does the governor says no, I don’t like that it’s Chinese business because I’d rather have a political talking point than thousands of good paying jobs.

If you don’t see the difference you are blind/deaf/dumb.


Someone who writes as poorly as you should not be calling others "blind/deaf/dumb."
DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I remember when dems and media ruthlessly bullied Scott Walker and gop dopes in Wisconsin for the Foxconn scam. Why are libs suddenly shilling foreign giveaway scams as a good thing?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/29/after-wisconsins-foxconn-debacle-states-rethink-giant-subsidies.html


So for FoxConn Walker promised to give $3 billion in tax credits to FoxConn. Here the state has spent $200 million to attract business to a site and when it does the governor says no, I don’t like that it’s Chinese business because I’d rather have a political talking point than thousands of good paying jobs.

If you don’t see the difference you are blind/deaf/dumb.

So the only difference is amount of the subsidy? How does that make it better? $200 million is still a lot of money.


So yes the amount of the subsidy matters— if you can attract jobs by paying $1000/job that’s a lot better than paying $1 million/job. But more importantly the state has already spent that money to attract a business. If you/Youngkin thinks that was a bad idea then maybe say so sooner. Now that the investment has paid off and a private company wants to spend big dollars to bring thousands of jobs he is rejecting them? Youngkin isn’t complaining about the subsidy— he is complaining about the busines that wants to open.

This new fascist control of the economy where DeSantis and Youngkin want to decide what companies can operate is really troubling


DP. Oh, please spare us. Any governor has a say in which businesses operate in their state. You seem ignorant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


+100
Anonymous
It was only located in the western most edge of Virginia because it needs to serve Ford’s new plants being built in Kentucky and Tennessee, right? There aren’t a hell of a lot of options for Ford and the Chinese — it’s way too expensive and cumbersome to ship those heavy batteries. So they’ll either build it in the Commonwealth anyways or they’re currently trying to extort (more) corporate welfare from TN and KY — and maybe WV and NC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


Too bad ford isn’t working with him and the plant is being built in Michigan


No chance, it’s too far away from the new Ford factories this is supposed to serve in TN and KY. Ford is leaving Michigan anyways. If they built this battery facility in Michigan, you have to haul everything 500+ miles to assembly. It’s a logistical nightmare. All these other mega battery plants are a stone’s throw from the assembly plant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It was only located in the western most edge of Virginia because it needs to serve Ford’s new plants being built in Kentucky and Tennessee, right? There aren’t a hell of a lot of options for Ford and the Chinese — it’s way too expensive and cumbersome to ship those heavy batteries. So they’ll either build it in the Commonwealth anyways or they’re currently trying to extort (more) corporate welfare from TN and KY — and maybe WV and NC.

It’s being built in Michigan.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/

That’s just stenography of what Youngkin said.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


Too bad ford isn’t working with him and the plant is being built in Michigan


No chance, it’s too far away from the new Ford factories this is supposed to serve in TN and KY. Ford is leaving Michigan anyways. If they built this battery facility in Michigan, you have to haul everything 500+ miles to assembly. It’s a logistical nightmare. All these other mega battery plants are a stone’s throw from the assembly plant.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/ford-china-s-catl-mull-workaround-for-a-battery-plant-in-michigan-or-virginia
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


Too bad ford isn’t working with him and the plant is being built in Michigan


No chance, it’s too far away from the new Ford factories this is supposed to serve in TN and KY. Ford is leaving Michigan anyways. If they built this battery facility in Michigan, you have to haul everything 500+ miles to assembly. It’s a logistical nightmare. All these other mega battery plants are a stone’s throw from the assembly plant.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/ford-china-s-catl-mull-workaround-for-a-battery-plant-in-michigan-or-virginia


“Considering Michigan” is just a negotiation tactic in an attempt to squeeze the states they really need it in. Look at a map. They are not going to haul heavy ass batteries over 500 miles. They need the battery plant in TN, KY or western VA, period. Youngkin is calling their bluff because he knows they don’t have other options. Just like Amazon still opened large offices New York after that corporate welfare scam was clawed back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A “Trojan horse” for China that would undermine policy efforts to strengthen the U.S. auto industry. Gov says he’ll work with Ford directly, but not with Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., also known as CATL, involved. Good on him.

https://www.autoblog.com/2023/01/20/virginia-governor-youngkin-ford-catl-plant/


Too bad ford isn’t working with him and the plant is being built in Michigan


No chance, it’s too far away from the new Ford factories this is supposed to serve in TN and KY. Ford is leaving Michigan anyways. If they built this battery facility in Michigan, you have to haul everything 500+ miles to assembly. It’s a logistical nightmare. All these other mega battery plants are a stone’s throw from the assembly plant.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/ford-china-s-catl-mull-workaround-for-a-battery-plant-in-michigan-or-virginia


“Considering Michigan” is just a negotiation tactic in an attempt to squeeze the states they really need it in. Look at a map. They are not going to haul heavy ass batteries over 500 miles. They need the battery plant in TN, KY or western VA, period. Youngkin is calling their bluff because he knows they don’t have other options. Just like Amazon still opened large offices New York after that corporate welfare scam was clawed back.


Also ask yourself why this Michigan rumor leaked. Ford and the Chinese leaked it themselves as they try to negotiate with states they need it in. Youngkin has them over a barrel. Meanwhile the governor in Michigan doesn’t realize she’s just a useful idiot.
Anonymous
He’s calling Ford and the Chinese firm’s bluff, similar to what NYC did to Amazon. New York pulled the rug on the HQ2 scam giveaways — and Amazon pr tried to smear them. Well, in the end Amazon expanded in New York City anyways.
https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/amazon-continues-expansion-in-new-york-city-even-after-hq2-debacle/
Anonymous
Retiring from politics
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: