DC statehood: Things that make my blood boil:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council’s sole purpose is to keep you talking about Statehood something that’s never going to occur.

Retrocession to Md.,

Why is the solution always to give the super liberal DC to Maryland? Why not give it to Virginia and admit Virginia does not want DC voters to definitively turn the state blue

OMG please know anything before commenting. Virginia already took their part of DC back. What remains originally belonged to Maryland.

So what? DC can't be given back to Virginia, but it could certainly be given to Virginia. And the PP is right, super weird that nobody ever mentions that possibility. I wonder why?

It can’t be given back to just anybody.

But it can be given to just anybody. Not that I think this is a good idea. I think DC statehood is a good idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council’s sole purpose is to keep you talking about Statehood something that’s never going to occur.

Retrocession to Md.,

Why is the solution always to give the super liberal DC to Maryland? Why not give it to Virginia and admit Virginia does not want DC voters to definitively turn the state blue

OMG please know anything before commenting. Virginia already took their part of DC back. What remains originally belonged to Maryland.

So what? DC can't be given back to Virginia, but it could certainly be given to Virginia. And the PP is right, super weird that nobody ever mentions that possibility. I wonder why?

It can’t be given back to just anybody.

But it can be given to just anybody. Not that I think this is a good idea. I think DC statehood is a good idea.

No, it really can’t. The DC citizens voted for statehood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council’s sole purpose is to keep you talking about Statehood something that’s never going to occur.

Retrocession to Md.,

Why is the solution always to give the super liberal DC to Maryland? Why not give it to Virginia and admit Virginia does not want DC voters to definitively turn the state blue

OMG please know anything before commenting. Virginia already took their part of DC back. What remains originally belonged to Maryland.

So what? DC can't be given back to Virginia, but it could certainly be given to Virginia. And the PP is right, super weird that nobody ever mentions that possibility. I wonder why?

It can’t be given back to just anybody.

But it can be given to just anybody. Not that I think this is a good idea. I think DC statehood is a good idea.

No, it really can’t. The DC citizens voted for statehood.

If the elected officials who belong to a certain political party cared about the opinions and wishes of DC citizens, then sales of recreational marijuana would be legal in DC, DC would always be allowed to decide for itself whether to spend its own locally-raised revenue on abortion care for DC residents on Medicaid, and DC would be a state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council’s sole purpose is to keep you talking about Statehood something that’s never going to occur.

Retrocession to Md.,

Why is the solution always to give the super liberal DC to Maryland? Why not give it to Virginia and admit Virginia does not want DC voters to definitively turn the state blue

OMG please know anything before commenting. Virginia already took their part of DC back. What remains originally belonged to Maryland.

So what? DC can't be given back to Virginia, but it could certainly be given to Virginia. And the PP is right, super weird that nobody ever mentions that possibility. I wonder why?

It can’t be given back to just anybody.

But it can be given to just anybody. Not that I think this is a good idea. I think DC statehood is a good idea.

No, it really can’t. The DC citizens voted for statehood.

You honestly believe that there has been some form of binding referendum on statehood passed by DC voters? LMAO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The council’s sole purpose is to keep you talking about Statehood something that’s never going to occur.

Retrocession to Md.,

Why is the solution always to give the super liberal DC to Maryland? Why not give it to Virginia and admit Virginia does not want DC voters to definitively turn the state blue

OMG please know anything before commenting. Virginia already took their part of DC back. What remains originally belonged to Maryland.

So what? DC can't be given back to Virginia, but it could certainly be given to Virginia. And the PP is right, super weird that nobody ever mentions that possibility. I wonder why?

It can’t be given back to just anybody.

But it can be given to just anybody. Not that I think this is a good idea. I think DC statehood is a good idea.

No, it really can’t. The DC citizens voted for statehood.

You honestly believe that there has been some form of binding referendum on statehood passed by DC voters? LMAO.

I do, because there has.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/09/501412360/d-c-votes-overwhelmingly-to-become-51st-state