Wait, so now that you do know where Charlottesville is located and that it isn’t part of NOVA, what are you complaining about? Skyline joining ECNL is bad for who exactly? |
Legacy might be a better candidate. |
It’s called CCL |
Bad for ECNL. A weak club |
I agree that they need to find a way to keep the level of competition sufficiently high or the league will decay as others have done before it. If there is no way to relegate or cut teams then eventually the better clubs get fed up and start a new league. It's a cycle that will continue until there is either promotion / relegation, or a league which is willing to fire its own members for non-performance. That said, I think Skyline might be good enough to belong in ECNL anyway. They're certainly better than plenty of ECNL clubs today. Time will tell I guess. |
| Skyline is no where near ECNL quality. Neither is BRYC. |
| Neither is your face. |
Lol. I’ll take the criticism. |
| This means BRYC will soon be replaced or they now have club to compete with on their level. |
I agree BRYC is weak. Skyline is significantly better than BRYC. I would say that Skyline boys are better than all of BRYC, McLean and Loudoun. They are not as good as Arlington or Richmond. So they may not be ECNL quality - whatever that is - but they are better than plenty of local ECNL clubs. |
Are they better than VDA? |
Depends on the year. However, from YSR, you can see why Skyline is a good team to add to ECNL and why some are saying BRYC and Mclean maybe should be replaced: U-13 1 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [26] 34.57 2 VDA ECNL [28] 34.46 5 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [84] 33.38 6 ARLINGTON SOCCER ECNL [144] 32.8 17 SKYLINE ELITE [446] 31.15 19 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [500] 30.92 31 MCLEAN YS YSA ECNL [831] 29.78 U-14 2 ARLINGTON SA SOCCER ECNL [53] 36.12 3 VDA ECNL [84] 35.59 6 SOCA SKYLINE ELITE [167] 34.81 7 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [170] 34.8 8 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [193] 34.67 23 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [578] 33.04 37 MCLEAN YS GREEN [871] 32.15 U-15 1 ARLINGTON SA SOCCER ECNL [6] 39.41 2 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [11] 39.07 3 SOCA SKYLINE ELITE [13] 38.9 7 VIRGINIA DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY ECNL [169] 36.92 9 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [205] 36.68 10 MCLEAN YS ECNL [219] 36.52 24 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [481] 35.26 U-16 1 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [4] 40.73 2 ARLINGTON SA SOCCER ECNL [5] 40.72 4 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [103] 38.79 6 SOCA SKYLINE ELITE [133] 38.5 11 MCLEAN YS ECNL [248] 37.81 17 VIRGINIA DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY ECNL [337] 37.35 24 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [498] 36.63 U-17 2 MCLEAN YS ECNL [24] 41.19 3 SOCA SKYLINE ELITE [37] 40.86 4 ARLINGTON SA SOCCER ECNL [41] 40.76 5 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [44] 40.68 7 VDA ECNL [64] 40.51 8 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [66] 40.5 10 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [86] 40.27 U-19 3 LOUDOUN SC SOCCER ECNL [39] 41.45 4 RICHMOND UNITED ECNL [55] 41.27 5 ARLINGTON SOCCER ECNL [68] 41.08 6 VDA ECNL [86] 40.79 7 BRADDOCK ROAD YOUTH CLUB ELITE ACADEMY ECNL [97] 40.58 9 MCLEAN YS YSA ECNL [159] 40.04 37 SOCA ELITE [510] 37.43 |
|
Ranking are based on points obtained from doing tournaments. This is a extremely flawed way of ranking teams considering most ECNL teams don't chase tournament points.
Skyline FC (SOCA) 04 girls were ranked #1 in VA and got handled by local ECNL teams. Don't put to much thought into it. |
I agree but many ECNL teams avoid tournaments for the risk of exposing as an average teams. |
GOTSOCCER, yes. YSR uses an algorithm based on scores during both league play and tournaments. Not saying it is 100% accurate, but its actually decent. |