LCPS school board meeting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are we rushing this?

LOL. We are definitely NOT rushing this. We will be returning, in hybrid model, with vaccinated teachers almost ONE YEAR after the last day of in-person school, 3/11/20.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only 40% of students want to go back.

That's still 35,000 students and they matter too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we rushing this?

LOL. We are definitely NOT rushing this. We will be returning, in hybrid model, with vaccinated teachers almost ONE YEAR after the last day of in-person school, 3/11/20.

They should only go back if the positivity Rate is below 10%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we rushing this?

LOL. We are definitely NOT rushing this. We will be returning, in hybrid model, with vaccinated teachers almost ONE YEAR after the last day of in-person school, 3/11/20.

They should only go back if the positivity Rate is below 10%

Thankfully the board no longer agrees with you. All they are debating now is the date. Its happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they were forced by their parents probably. Some 5th grader was on a couple meetings ago talking about high school lol

Shouldn’t be an exciting meeting. The 3/3 return for all is what I think will happen.

Damn that guy that just spoke.
Deputy had to removed him

For what? Maskless or refused to yield the mic?

Refusing to yield the mic
He went on a rant on now it’s safe to open schools now, for the record it’s still not safe .

Which guy? Brian D who writes on social media as Virginia SGP? He’s mentally deranged. Probably suffers too much but he loves litigating so there’s that lmao

If it was him that makes complete sense. That dude is off .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we rushing this?

LOL. We are definitely NOT rushing this. We will be returning, in hybrid model, with vaccinated teachers almost ONE YEAR after the last day of in-person school, 3/11/20.

They should only go back if the positivity Rate is below 10%

By 3/3 it should be. I’m a teacher. I did some math based on the average PCR drop rate and by 3/1 it has us under 10% for 5 days if the drop rate holds. My calculation had today at 15.1% and it was, so it’s holding. Cases are high for sure but only one has to drop per the metrics so even if they do away with them, 3/3 should have been in that range anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they were forced by their parents probably. Some 5th grader was on a couple meetings ago talking about high school lol

Shouldn’t be an exciting meeting. The 3/3 return for all is what I think will happen.

Damn that guy that just spoke.
Deputy had to removed him

For what? Maskless or refused to yield the mic?

Refusing to yield the mic
He went on a rant on now it’s safe to open schools now, for the record it’s still not safe .

For the record, it is safe. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/cdc-school-virus-spread/2021/01/26/bf949222-5fe6-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because it's freaking awkward to speak at a school board meeting when you are a teenager.

+1. This. These kids have been sitting with cameras off and communicating using the chat function and not their voice for a year. They are regressing in this area. And speaking to the school board is real tough under normal circumstances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because it's freaking awkward to speak at a school board meeting when you are a teenager.

+1. This. These kids have been sitting with cameras off and communicating using the chat function and not their voice for a year. They are regressing in this area. And speaking to the school board is real tough under normal circumstances.

Oh come on. They have not spent a year not talking, that’s a bit much to claim

[Anonymous]

Lets hope Morse or Serotkin motion to suspend the rules to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets hope Morse or Serotkin motion to suspend the rules to vote.

Vote to RTS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets hope Morse or Serotkin motion to suspend the rules to vote.

I was under the impression they were voting tonight ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lets hope Morse or Serotkin motion to suspend the rules to vote.

I was under the impression they were voting tonight ?

They will have to suspend the rules first since its not an "action item" on the agenda. Suspending the rules takes 2/3, whereas voting on return to school is a simple majority. Otherwise someone (likely Ian or Jeff) will announce tonight that it will be an action item at the meeting in two weeks. Won't change the date, just the date of the vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are we rushing this?

Rushing this? Yeah, let's wait until 2025 just to be sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets hope Morse or Serotkin motion to suspend the rules to vote.

they will