McConnell Whines About ‘Moscow Mitch’ Nickname: It’s ‘Over the Top’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The other variation I've heard is Moscow's b**** Mitch, he should be thankful that one isn't more popular...yet.

I've heard Moscow Mitch, Putin's b*"#@
He should be happy that one is not as popular either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the news is forcing MoscowMitch to reconsider?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-turnaround-mcconnell-backs-250-million-in-election-security-funding/2019/09/19/b9f64462-daec-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html

McConnell stripped out all of the Dem language about shoring up cyber security. So basically this bill is a cash giveway with a veneer of election security.

No thanks, that is worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the news is forcing MoscowMitch to reconsider?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-turnaround-mcconnell-backs-250-million-in-election-security-funding/2019/09/19/b9f64462-daec-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html

McConnell stripped out all of the Dem language about shoring up cyber security. So basically this bill is a cash giveway with a veneer of election security.

No thanks, that is worse.

Bluch. They’re rigging it again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The other variation I've heard is Moscow's b**** Mitch, he should be thankful that one isn't more popular...yet.

I've heard Moscow Mitch, Putin's b*"#@
He should be happy that one is not as popular either.

He truly is Putin's b****. I hope both catches on for his reelection.

[Anonymous]

After McGrath launched her 2020 bid, McConnell's campaign manager called the Democrat an "extreme liberal" who is "out of touch" with Kentucky voters. But her 2018 race was nearly the biggest upset of the election cycle. In a district that overwhelmingly voted for Trump in 2016, McGrath lost by just three percentage points.

McConnell, on the other hand, has become the least popular senator in the country. According to polls from Morning Consult, just 36 percent of Kentuckians approve of McConnell while 50 percent disapprove.

[Anonymous]

Oh, THAT Oleg Deripaska

https://www.ft.com/content/20b95b2c-4e6e-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, THAT Oleg Deripaska

https://www.ft.com/content/20b95b2c-4e6e-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

Is that the Russian who was building an aluminum plant in Kentucky and donated to Mitch’s PAC? This is bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The other variation I've heard is Moscow's b**** Mitch, he should be thankful that one isn't more popular...yet.

I've heard Moscow Mitch, Putin's b*"#@
He should be happy that one is not as popular either.

I think Mitch is much more beholden to Beijing than Moscow. So is Bloomberg.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, THAT Oleg Deripaska

https://www.ft.com/content/20b95b2c-4e6e-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

Is that the Russian who was building an aluminum plant in Kentucky and donated to Mitch’s PAC? This is bad.

Wow. Very bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, THAT Oleg Deripaska

https://www.ft.com/content/20b95b2c-4e6e-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

Is that the Russian who was building an aluminum plant in Kentucky and donated to Mitch’s PAC? This is bad.

Wow. Very bad.

It’s paywalled, but we already knew the headline, that Deripaska laundered money for Putin, didn’t we? What is groundbreaking in the story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, THAT Oleg Deripaska

https://www.ft.com/content/20b95b2c-4e6e-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

Is that the Russian who was building an aluminum plant in Kentucky and donated to Mitch’s PAC? This is bad.

Wow. Very bad.

Yup. There’s a reason Moscow Mitch stuck to him.

[Anonymous]

Moscow Mitch has no right to bitch.

[Anonymous]

No but seriously could someone who can read the article explain what is new in it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No but seriously could someone who can read the article explain what is new in it?

That the US was set to levy sanctions in December and then it was mysteriously dropped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No but seriously could someone who can read the article explain what is new in it?

That the US was set to levy sanctions in December and then it was mysteriously dropped.

So he is really irritated by "Moscow Mitch" because it's true?