I find it humorous that your offended. It’s actually making me laugh. I’m sure your child worked so very very hard! |
| I’m sorry but the Ivy League is largely just a brand today. Leftism, critical race theory, anodother PC nonsense dominate the Ivy League. Kids used to be required to have a reading knowledge of Greek, Latin, AND a modern language JUST TO GET INTO AN IVY. Standards today are a joke. What does one get from attending an Ivy other than professional benefits? Studying with nuts like Peter Singer? |
OP, I'd be offended too. Clearly she doesn't realize what a fool she is making of herself. My relatives all attend/attended Purdue. They all tell me that Purdue is equivalent or better than ivy league schools. I just nod. My DC attends an ivy league school. |
Alex, I'll take things that never happened for $500, please. |
+1 It’s not a real thing. “Ivy League” is just a sports conference. “Public Ivy” is a term manufactured by parents to make themselves feel better about their choices. |
Yes, it IS a brand, one known for excellence all over the world. If the standards were a "joke" as you say, would most of the schools still have an admit rate of single digits?
Now THAT is funny.
Aaaaannnndddd... it was only a matter of time before this idiot showed up. |
Yes, or rather their reduced choices. The only universities or colleges in the US that I'd consider equivalent or better than an Ivy would be MIT and then on the next rung down, places like Berkeley and UCLA, William & Mary, so on and so forth |
Stanford is up there. So is Chicago, Duke, Northwestern, etc. TONS of great schools that are all in different sports conferences.
|
| The difference in cost is fairly substantial. That’s the point the 1988 author was trying to make. |
Now THAT is funny.
Aaaaannnndddd... it was only a matter of time before this idiot showed up. We’ve gone through this before and always come back to....in reality, it’s just a sports conference. People may perceive that it’s more than that but that perception is just based on manufactured hype. Not reality. |
| Wahoo here. We roll our eyes at people who say it. We are fine with being a public school. People who have to say “public ivy” obviously think there something wrong with just being a good public school. |
Now THAT is funny.
Aaaaannnndddd... it was only a matter of time before this idiot showed up. I am talking about academic standards.( specifically in the humanities) Low admit rate doesn’t mean a damn thing. They have low admit rates because 1. Thousands upon thousands of students apply 2. People still see the Ivy League as providing an excellent education( albeit wrongly) and of course the professional benefits/connections are excellent so the smartest students( by today’s standards anyway) apply. Look up what Harvey Manssfield ( a long time Harvard professor) has to say about its academic standards. The Ivy’s used to produce great witers, orators, and statesmen(Frost, Calhoun, Adams) What do they produ now? Idiots like Bush, Hillary, Obama, Trump, Cruz etc |
| Of course "Ivy League" is a brand, just like Ashley Madison.com. |
LOL. Old turdy losers are funny. |
Right. No answer to a cogent point, just “LOL” |