Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is why I don’t understand the logic behind “test optional” admisssions. In this world of everyone gets a trophy, it’s the only standardized measure by which schools can compare students. When I read college confidential and someone claims to have an unweighted 4.0 and a 1120 SAT, my eyebrows go up. So many schools have rampant grade inflation that you just can’t compare GPAs from one school to another.
And yes, I know, some kids aren’t good at timed tests...but 90% of school grades are based on timed tests also. Students who need accommodations on tests in school also get accommodations on standardized tests.
The other possibility is that this proportion of kids is doing A work. It’s not like this has to be on a bell curve.[/quote
Teachers should post the test scores (anonymously if necessary), or, at a minimum, post the mean score for the test and the standard deviation. This allows each student to evaluate their knowledge of the material relative to their classmates. For those students who are truly interested to learn, this information can be invaluable for assessing whether they are competitive with their fellow students - it also allows for an assessment of whether the tests are well constructed. The IB program allows for a direct evaluation of the students (and their teachers) in comparison to hundreds of thousands of international students who study this curriculum and take standardized tests. FCPS also participates in the PISA (OECD test) and some results from that are available: From FCPS - 10/16/17 Academic Performance Update
In November of 2016, a sampling of 15 year olds from each of our high school participated in the OECD Test for Schools. According to the documentation, “The reading domain of the OECD Test for Schools assesses the active, purposeful and functional application of reading in a range of situations and for various purposes.” Beginning in August 2016, all FCPS middle and high schools have been engaged in professional development in disciplinary literacy, with the intent of increasing the opportunities for students to read, write, think, and discuss content in authentic ways. We believe this cross curricular approach to literacy aligns to the knowledge and skills assessed in the OECD and will result in growth in future test administrations. [authentic gobbledygook]
The November 2016 results for the reading domain showed the following schools preformed below the United States OECD mean scaled score: Edison HS, Herndon HS, Mount Vernon HS, Stuart HS, Lee HS, and Annandale HS. While all schools have been involved in the Secondary Literacy work, Instructional Services Department (ISD) is providing more intensive support to a handful of schools including: Herndon MS, Herndon HS, Edison HS, and Mount Vernon HS. ISD staff will reach out to the Literacy Teams at Stuart HS, Lee HS, and Annandale HS to more intentionally support their school based efforts.
All FCPS High Schools scored above the United States OECD mean scaled score in mathematics.
______________________________________________________________________________
A College Board document on International Comparative Assessments (including PISA, TIMSS, and NAEP - but not IB of course) can be found here:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562752.pdf