Neil deGrasse Tyson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, it turns out that I now assume any man with a name in a title has been accused of sexual assault/harassment. Happy to be wrong!

He does have an accusation, actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I used to love him,back when I only heard snippets. Then I watched some videos, and he really is insufferable. I think his defenders love the idea of him, just like I did.

Same. DH and I took DD to a live show he was doing and it was awful. We left early.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, it turns out that I now assume any man with a name in a title has been accused of sexual assault/harassment. Happy to be wrong!

You probably don't want to google "Neil deGrasse Tyson" and "accusation."

I have no idea if there's any truth to it, but someone did make an accusation during the initial Weinstein fallout.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems insufferable per his Twitter. Like, a case study on the concept of mansplaining.

Your are a sexist.

[Anonymous]

Not half as funny as he thinks he is. The parody twitter posts are funny, however.

[Anonymous]

I like him.

[Anonymous]

He is an insufferable twit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not half as funny as he thinks he is. The parody twitter posts are funny, however.

As an unabashed nerd lover, because smart is sexy, they really never are half as funny as they think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, it turns out that I now assume any man with a name in a title has been accused of sexual assault/harassment. Happy to be wrong!

You probably don't want to google "Neil deGrasse Tyson" and "accusation."

I have no idea if there's any truth to it, but someone did make an accusation during the initial Weinstein fallout.

And while you’re at it “David Copperfield” and “accusation”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not half as funny as he thinks he is. The parody twitter posts are funny, however.

Most people on Twitter are not half as funny as they think they are. He’s fundamentally a nerd.

I love him and what he does for science. Hope that the accusations are false.

[Anonymous]

He's really king of the nerds. The best nerd we've got explaining science right now though. I don't listen to Star Talk because I find his topics really boring. Loved Cosmos though.

[Anonymous]

I saw him at RSA last year. He was addressing an audience of very well educated and smart people. He didn't adjust his schtick for the more intelligent audience which seems very arrogant to me. I was bored and left half way through. Seems geared toward smart kids not grown ups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw him at RSA last year. He was addressing an audience of very well educated and smart people. He didn't adjust his schtick for the more intelligent audience which seems very arrogant to me. I was bored and left half way through. Seems geared toward smart kids not grown ups.

Rude.

[Anonymous]

His attitudes toward religion are rude. You’re an atheist we get it, no need to be an a-hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw him at RSA last year. He was addressing an audience of very well educated and smart people. He didn't adjust his schtick for the more intelligent audience which seems very arrogant to me. I was bored and left half way through. Seems geared toward smart kids not grown ups.

Rude.

You are clearly completely clueless. Again, this was at RSA. It was not rude at all. Have you ever been to a large professional
Conference? It was a huge auditorium. People constantly come and go from these things. You are an idiot.