Trump Administration Wife Beaters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Yeah I know how to spell it, nimrod. Typing on a phone. But we could just spell it Goebbels and cut to the chase.

- because everyone you disagree with is a Nazi. Got it. Can't spell or argue.

Argue successfully in federal courts on the regular, so no. Your logic is very flawed. I compared one person to Goebbels. So you said that means "everyone I disagree with" is a Nazi. Not everyone is a nazi. Bannon has a lot in common with propagandist Goebbels. No wonder Trump loves the poorly educated.

[Anonymous]

Trump's picked 16 people so far. Four are women. So out of the other 12 and him, only three have been officially accused of wife beating. He's keeping the domestic violence level below 25%!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Yeah I know how to spell it, nimrod. Typing on a phone. But we could just spell it Goebbels and cut to the chase.

- because everyone you disagree with is a Nazi. Got it. Can't spell or argue.

Argue successfully in federal courts on the regular, so no. Your logic is very flawed. I compared one person to Goebbels. So you said that means "everyone I disagree with" is a Nazi. Not everyone is a nazi. Bannon has a lot in common with propagandist Goebbels. No wonder Trump loves the poorly educated.

You should find another career; one you're good at.

[Anonymous]

There is a huge difference between being accused of something and actually being guilty of doing it.

A few years ago, a prominent Democrat was accused of domestic abuse. Turns out it was a false accusation.

Have you ever read the book “Accused” by Tonya Craft? Very sad story.
It’s pretty easy to accuse someone of something terrible, especially when you are “out to get” that person.
Too often, the accusations are totally false.

Remember the phrase..... Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

[Anonymous]

Wonder how many of the accused graduated from UVA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Character assassination? nah, we would be considered amateurs at that, we just cite facts. How can you "character assassinate" somebody by correctly citing a fact related to that person. The professionals make up stories about adverse candidates raping children in the basement of pizza stores....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Yeah I know how to spell it, nimrod. Typing on a phone. But we could just spell it Goebbels and cut to the chase.

- because everyone you disagree with is a Nazi. Got it. Can't spell or argue.

Argue successfully in federal courts on the regular, so no. Your logic is very flawed. I compared one person to Goebbels. So you said that means "everyone I disagree with" is a Nazi. Not everyone is a nazi. Bannon has a lot in common with propagandist Goebbels. No wonder Trump loves the poorly educated.

You should find another career; one you're good at.

NP. Three members of Trump's cabinet have faced accusations of domestic abuse, one got a protective order against him. I know you are just trying to focus on spelling, Nazi and whatever else can make you avoid to face the issue raised in this thread, but hey, you chose a shitty candidate now find actual arguments to defend him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Character assassination? nah, we would be considered amateurs at that, we just cite facts. How can you "character assassinate" somebody by correctly citing a fact related to that person. The professionals make up stories about adverse candidates raping children in the basement of pizza stores....

Accepting accusations as proven facts sounds like fake news, don't you agree?

And when that fake news is passed off as fact to demean the accused, it constitutes character assassination.

But you go right ahead; please continue with your fake news ranting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Character assassination? nah, we would be considered amateurs at that, we just cite facts. How can you "character assassinate" somebody by correctly citing a fact related to that person. The professionals make up stories about adverse candidates raping children in the basement of pizza stores....

Accepting accusations as proven facts sounds like fake news, don't you agree?

And when that fake news is passed off as fact to demean the accused, it constitutes character assassination.

But you go right ahead; please continue with your fake news ranting.

Court orders and sworn testimony is not exactly "fake news".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That'd be a great name for an alt left punk rock band!

Lol!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Yeah I know how to spell it, nimrod. Typing on a phone. But we could just spell it Goebbels and cut to the chase.

- because everyone you disagree with is a Nazi. Got it. Can't spell or argue.

Argue successfully in federal courts on the regular, so no. Your logic is very flawed. I compared one person to Goebbels. So you said that means "everyone I disagree with" is a Nazi. Not everyone is a nazi. Bannon has a lot in common with propagandist Goebbels. No wonder Trump loves the poorly educated.

You should find another career; one you're good at.

Oh honey. Win record is fantastic. You seem to think you're a good judge of argument. You aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge difference between being accused of something and actually being guilty of doing it.

A few years ago, a prominent Democrat was accused of domestic abuse. Turns out it was a false accusation.

Have you ever read the book “Accused” by Tonya Craft? Very sad story.
It’s pretty easy to accuse someone of something terrible, especially when you are “out to get” that person.
Too often, the accusations are totally false.

Remember the phrase..... Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Yes we know there weren't convictions (though a protective order requires a finding of a basis for fear). But three accused abusers seems a bit high, no? And let'/ remember that Hillary and Bill were never convicted of anything, but that didn't stop you from believing those accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Character assassination? nah, we would be considered amateurs at that, we just cite facts. How can you "character assassinate" somebody by correctly citing a fact related to that person. The professionals make up stories about adverse candidates raping children in the basement of pizza stores....

Accepting accusations as proven facts sounds like fake news, don't you agree?

And when that fake news is passed off as fact to demean the accused, it constitutes character assassination.

But you go right ahead; please continue with your fake news ranting.

Not fake news. Stated the truth, which is that they were accused. So you think all three women were lying? Huh. Trumpers respect women so much...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a huge difference between being accused of something and actually being guilty of doing it.

A few years ago, a prominent Democrat was accused of domestic abuse. Turns out it was a false accusation.

Have you ever read the book “Accused” by Tonya Craft? Very sad story.
It’s pretty easy to accuse someone of something terrible, especially when you are “out to get” that person.
Too often, the accusations are totally false.

Remember the phrase..... Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

So all three married women who hated them so much they would accuse them of abuse and rape? Sounds like at the very least they have terrible judgment and an inability to get along with others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we know Ivana said under oath that Trump raped and beat her. Brannon's ex-wife accused him of beating her, in their divorce proceedings. Now the new Labor Secretary appointment has a record of domestic violence to the point that his ex had a protective order against him. Now of course all those exes have been convinced to recant those accusations. What gives? That's a pretty big coincidence. I don't know anyone who had allegations of violence against their wives. But three in one cabinet? Seems like these are the kind of guys Trump likes.

It's spelled Bannon, BTW. But don't let your ignorance get in the way of your partisan character assassination.

Yeah I know how to spell it, nimrod. Typing on a phone. But we could just spell it Goebbels and cut to the chase.

+1