It's about time - moves under way to dump DWS!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

Obama picked her. Clinton would probably be thrilled for DWS to step aside. Let's have Jennifer Granholm in that seat.

Probably a deal made as part of Obama getting Clinton's support when he beat her in 2008. DWS as Clinton's campaign chair needed a landing spot.

No. Let me guess: you also think Obama offered Secretary of State to Clinton in order to get her to concede. Amirite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

Obama picked her. Clinton would probably be thrilled for DWS to step aside. Let's have Jennifer Granholm in that seat.

Probably a deal made as part of Obama getting Clinton's support when he beat her in 2008. DWS as Clinton's campaign chair needed a landing spot.

She didn't need a landing spot, because she was a sitting Congresswoman.

And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

I thought it was because she wanted to endorse Sanders, and as a member of the DNC leadership she had to remain neutral in the primary?

- Clinton supporter who thinks DWS probably has to go, and would LOVE to see Jennifer Granholm in that spot. Great idea, PP.

I wish I could claim credit for the Granholm idea, but I can't. A number of people more knowledgable than I have suggested Clinton would like Granholm to run the DNC. I too think it's a fantastic idea.

[Anonymous]

DWS's role as head of DNC was to unite the party and to fund raise.

She has failed miserably with regard to uniting the party and has actually contributed to the divisiveness in the party. She should step down or be fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

Id lime to see more women in office, but she's a sh!t to her poorer constituents, too. Nothing to be admired, here...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

Id lime to see more women in office, but she's a sh!t to her poorer constituents, too. Nothing to be admired, here...

What's your evidence for this claim?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

She may well "get things done" but she has clearly been highly divisive and damaging to party unity and that's not one of the things we need her to get done.

[jsteele]

She needs to resign so that she can spend more time with the pay day lending industry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

Id lime to see more women in office, but she's a sh!t to her poorer constituents, too. Nothing to be admired, here...

What's your evidence for this claim?

See jsteele's post above. Any web search will reveal a host of financial issues with Ms. WS, and she's leading the charge against the financial regulations built up by hero Elizabeth Warren specifically intended to protect vulnerable people with very little money. WS stands to gain a great deal from the payday lending industry by helping them steal from those who already have very little. It's beyond shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

Id lime to see more women in office, but she's a sh!t to her poorer constituents, too. Nothing to be admired, here...

What's your evidence for this claim?

See jsteele's post above. Any web search will reveal a host of financial issues with Ms. WS, and she's leading the charge against the financial regulations built up by hero Elizabeth Warren specifically intended to protect vulnerable people with very little money. WS stands to gain a great deal from the payday lending industry by helping them steal from those who already have very little. It's beyond shameful.

Got it. If you hope to persuade, it's better to be specific than to say "she's a shit."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

Id lime to see more women in office, but she's a sh!t to her poorer constituents, too. Nothing to be admired, here...

What's your evidence for this claim?

See jsteele's post above. Any web search will reveal a host of financial issues with Ms. WS, and she's leading the charge against the financial regulations built up by hero Elizabeth Warren specifically intended to protect vulnerable people with very little money. WS stands to gain a great deal from the payday lending industry by helping them steal from those who already have very little. It's beyond shameful.

Got it. If you hope to persuade, it's better to be specific than to say "she's a shit."

Well, she's a shit with or without the explanation.