It's about time - moves under way to dump DWS!

[Anonymous]

"Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz"

DWS has been an unmitigated disaster as chairperson of the DNC. Removing her as chairwoman of the convention would be a step in the right direction.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/281147-dems-discuss-dropping-wasserman-schultz

[Anonymous]

It's ok. She knew this might happen. In the meantime I'm sure Clinton has made it worth her while.

$

Corrupt.

[Anonymous]

The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

God,you are annoying,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's ok. She knew this might happen. In the meantime I'm sure Clinton has made it worth her while.

$

Corrupt.

I love it. Conclusions based entirely on your imagination. Classic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

You're not right. You're a tantruming toddler who got his way. DWS has to take one for the team because of your little tantrums. She's a grownup, so she will and live to fight another day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

You're not right. You're a tantruming toddler who got his way. DWS has to take one for the team because of your little tantrums. She's a grownup, so she will and live to fight another day.

It's not about some random poster on DCUM. Read the articles coming out. Many ranking Democrats are aligning in favor of replacing Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Be as annoyed as you want, call people names all you like but the facts are what they are, DWS was out of line, has clear conflicts of interest, and lacks the ability to perform her job appropriately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

You're not right. You're a tantruming toddler who got his way. DWS has to take one for the team because of your little tantrums. She's a grownup, so she will and live to fight another day.

It's not about some random poster on DCUM. Read the articles coming out. Many ranking Democrats are aligning in favor of replacing Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Be as annoyed as you want, call people names all you like but the facts are what they are, DWS was out of line, has clear conflicts of interest, and lacks the ability to perform her job appropriately.

None of those people are agreeing that she did anything wrong. They're saying she has to go because the Bernie fans are going to raise a stink if she doesn't. That doesn't make you right. It makes you an effective bully.

[Anonymous]

I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

[Anonymous]

Damn, I thought you were talking about "Dancng with the stars"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

Obama picked her. Clinton would probably be thrilled for DWS to step aside. Let's have Jennifer Granholm in that seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sanders supporters have been saying this for months. And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

At the time, the Hillary supporters just rolled their eyes and looked at us like we had three heads and were speaking Russian.

Turned out we were right all along. As we have been with so much else.

You're not right. You're a tantruming toddler who got his way. DWS has to take one for the team because of your little tantrums. She's a grownup, so she will and live to fight another day.

It's not about some random poster on DCUM. Read the articles coming out. Many ranking Democrats are aligning in favor of replacing Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Be as annoyed as you want, call people names all you like but the facts are what they are, DWS was out of line, has clear conflicts of interest, and lacks the ability to perform her job appropriately.

None of those people are agreeing that she did anything wrong. They're saying she has to go because the Bernie fans are going to raise a stink if she doesn't. That doesn't make you right. It makes you an effective bully.

There's plenty that she's done wrong and they all know it. She's displayed tremendous favoritism and has given a lot of support to the Clinton campaign during the Primary when she as DNC chair was supposed to remain neutral and impartial until the Convention. And, she had a clear motivation and clear conflict of interest for doing so, since she had been Hillary's campaign chair in 2008. She should have stepped down as soon as Clinton announced her bid for the Presidency.

[Anonymous]

DWS is one of the most effective people on the hill. Because she's a strong woman, she's labelled a ball buster or difficult. If she had a penis, people would call her strong or effective.

It's a shame this is happening. I guarantee her replacement will be a man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

Obama picked her. Clinton would probably be thrilled for DWS to step aside. Let's have Jennifer Granholm in that seat.

Probably a deal made as part of Obama getting Clinton's support when he beat her in 2008. DWS as Clinton's campaign chair needed a landing spot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a strong Clinton supporter and I think the Bernie crowd is absolutely right about DWS. She reeks of bias and inside dealing, and should never have been appointed as DNC chair.

Obama picked her. Clinton would probably be thrilled for DWS to step aside. Let's have Jennifer Granholm in that seat.

Probably a deal made as part of Obama getting Clinton's support when he beat her in 2008. DWS as Clinton's campaign chair needed a landing spot.

She didn't need a landing spot, because she was a sitting Congresswoman.

And there was a serious reason why Tulsi Gabbard left, and it was in frustration and disgust.

I thought it was because she wanted to endorse Sanders, and as a member of the DNC leadership she had to remain neutral in the primary?

- Clinton supporter who thinks DWS probably has to go, and would LOVE to see Jennifer Granholm in that spot. Great idea, PP.