Republicans jumping into the Paris fray, saying all the wrong things...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ben Carson referred to ISIS as an "existential" threat in response to the attacks... Is Ben Carson trapped in a book from Camus or Sartre? That might explain a few things...

I am not a Carson fan. Not remotely. But here, it is you who sounds intellectually challenged. "Existential" and "existentialism" mean two different things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben Carson referred to ISIS as an "existential" threat in response to the attacks... Is Ben Carson trapped in a book from Camus or Sartre? That might explain a few things...

I am not a Carson fan. Not remotely. But here, it is you who sounds intellectually challenged. "Existential" and "existentialism" mean two different things.

ex·is·ten·tial
?e?z??sten(t)SH(?)l/
adjective
of or relating to existence.
PHILOSOPHY
concerned with existence, especially human existence as viewed in the theories of existentialism.
LOGIC
(of a proposition) affirming or implying the existence of a thing.

Ah yes, I am the one who is so profoundly challenged. Obviously they mean totally DIFFERENT things and have NOTHING to do with each other.

LMAO! Thanks for playing, tho.

[Anonymous]

Kind of like the 'GUN CONTROL NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" posts that appear immediately after any shooting? (Well, except for those that occur in predominately black areas, of course.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ben Carson referred to ISIS as an "existential" threat in response to the attacks... Is Ben Carson trapped in a book from Camus or Sartre? That might explain a few things...

I am not a Carson fan. Not remotely. But here, it is you who sounds intellectually challenged. "Existential" and "existentialism" mean two different things.

ex·is·ten·tial
?e?z??sten(t)SH(?)l/
adjective
of or relating to existence.
PHILOSOPHY
concerned with existence, especially human existence as viewed in the theories of existentialism.
LOGIC
(of a proposition) affirming or implying the existence of a thing.

Ah yes, I am the one who is so profoundly challenged. Obviously they mean totally DIFFERENT things and have NOTHING to do with each other.

LMAO! Thanks for playing, tho.

Nope still wrong. And still dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff Duncan obviously does not understand that the Paris terrorists are exactly the people that the Syrian refugees were trying to get AWAY from when they left Syria.

How can you be so sure that none of the refugees are actually members of ISIS? You cannot. If it turns out. That even one of the perpetrators came in with refugees, they will all be expelled from every country in Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ben Carson referred to ISIS as an "existential" threat in response to the attacks... Is Ben Carson trapped in a book from Camus or Sartre? That might explain a few things...

I'm guessing he means the threat of our times,a threat to all that has meaning, or most straightforwardly a threat to our existence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff Duncan obviously does not understand that the Paris terrorists are exactly the people that the Syrian refugees were trying to get AWAY from when they left Syria.

That's the new left line. It completely ignores that ISIS stated it planned to pretend to be Syrian refugees....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:That was from January.

Trump's tweet was from Jan - the Charlie Hebdo attacks. The french ambassador dug it out and posted his reply tonight? Weird.

Why does it matter when the Donald's Tweet was? Was the comment any LESS repugnant in a different context?

No. It wasn't.

Here's hoping the Donald is stricken by a fatal heart attack tonight. The world would be better off if he just dropped dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Politics is what you're thinking about now?

Politics CAUSED this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FOX News anchor Monica Crowley yammering about Obama "speculating" on the terrorists:

https://twitter.com/MonicaCrowley/status/665301349903548416

He never did mention Islam

[Anonymous]

It will be interesting to see how the killers entered the country. What exactly has been France's contribution to fighting ISIS or should I say ISIL, can't keep that straight.

[Anonymous]

The problem is, is they WANT death. Kill one, and 15 want to take his place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Neocon David Frum hawking border fences:

https://twitter.com/davidfrum/status/665304142772965376

Maybe he should focus on Canadian gun policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff Duncan obviously does not understand that the Paris terrorists are exactly the people that the Syrian refugees were trying to get AWAY from when they left Syria.

How can you be so sure that none of the refugees are actually members of ISIS? You cannot. If it turns out. That even one of the perpetrators came in with refugees, they will all be expelled from every country in Europe.

The Donald will deport each and every one of them.

[Anonymous]

Maybe if the people of Paris had requested a safe space.