Don't you have anything better to do than to stalk the teachers and admin. at your children's schools? pretty pathetic |
You forgot to answer the question or open your ears and eyes. Do the teachers and leadership at your school reflect the diversity of her students? |
Leadership makes blunders when they represent only their own interests to the exclusion of their constituents. Are you surprised when the College Board or the MCPS come out with stupid policy? Who does the stupid policy benefit each case? If you can answer these questions these recent policies come as no surprise. Don't squirm in your undies. It's a dead give away the bare truth is near. |
The truth is out there (weird sci-fi noises).... Sorry, but you've got the wrong end of the stick. The reason MoCo doesn't care about your high-achieving kid is not because your kid is Asian and they are white/black. It's because they know your kid will do well on the standardized tests without their help. Your high-achieving kid allows them to focus teaching resources on the low- and middle-performers so these other kids will pass the tests. You don't need to look to conspiracy theories for something that actually has a very simple explanation. |
Tell us how MCPS is consolidating her resources 50 min classes of 25 to 28 of all abilities? Are they providing more teachers in these 50 min classes who can teach to all abilities? Are they planning to use the internet and get Sol Khan and other teaches to provide instruction for all these students? Now tell us how blocking the pathway of students to advance in Math for example consumes additional MCPS? |
But isn't this hypocrisy. MCPS and MoCo leadership cared in 1960, 1970 and 1980 when these high achieving kids were European Americans (Whites) even if they did well on the standardized tests then without help. Why in 2010 when these high achieving kids are no longer white does MoCo and MCPS leadership decide to refocus and drop there caring souls? I understand from your preamble to your post ... the truth is out there and you have spoken it well. |
Yup, in 1970 they cared for the high performers and ignored the rest. In 2010, they no longer care for the high performers and now want to focus on the rest. Hmm. I wonder why? |
There were no high stakes tests in the 70s, 80s and 90s for schools to be judged on. |
You're crazy. I'm leaving, just in case it's contagious. |
I am confused by this whole thread. I thought the high performing kids were white and Asian and most of the Asians are not recent immigrants. The recent immigrants are the hispanic families who are typically not performing in the top group and are likely to benefit from a focus on the bottom 90% of the kids. Granted my kids are in MCPS HS so are not affected by the new math curriculum but this tirade against some perceived "old guard" (not clear exactly who that is or how many of them there are) seems misplaced. |
I like your defense/spin. Sounds like the College Board spin. SAT for the rich in the summer after prepping well and hard for their aptitude test. This was just a pilot! |
You are confused. |
I'm confused too. When I look around my kids' magnets, I see lots of white (mine) and Asian kids. OP is Asian, judging by her links. Perhaps her kids aren't in magnets, though.
And Whitman, one of the better schools in the county, is known as "WhiteMan" for a reason. |
I think the goal of mcps is to reduce the "gap". Previours, all students got extra push in mcps. Although the teat results have been improved for AA and Hispanic, the Asia A and white students also got better. No reducing in the gap. Noe, since only very limited high performing kids can go to the magnet program, the smart kids left in regular class will not be able to advance to their best abilty. The test results from the top performers in regular classes will be more close to the middle. The slow learners who have gotten a lot of extra push will continue getting the same amount or even more extra pushes so they will test better than before. A small gap is finally here in mcps! |
I am in my children's schools every day. The principal and teachers DO reflect the student body. What does this prove? |