I think he taught his final classes this fall! I think taught there for 70 yrs. |
Oh, please. Wharton - arguably the best there is - is a direct admit. Other direct admit business schools: Ross, Dyson, Kelley, McDonough, Stern, Tepper, Mendoza, Marshall, and more. These are "the better schools." |
Agree... |
| From an applicant perspective i would rather apply to a direct admit than take a risk. |
McIntire was a 2-year program decades ago. One applied to transfer to it during 2nd year college. Now it is a 3-year program. McIntire has not been direct admit at least in recent decades. |
Same. I would rather do one of two things: apply to a direct admit program, or apply to a school that has no undergrad business school but has good outcomes. |
Your AI response doesn't mean anything when you've just been given a list of the *best* business schools that are direct admit. DP |
What are you even talking about? All the top business schools are direct admit! It is the reason my DC may not accept their spot at UVA. Too risky given the 60% chance they won’t get in. |
+1 I got a good laugh from the PP! |
That would be difficult since he got his PhD in 1967. I just saw him at church and he said nothing about teaching his last class. But pp is right - I bet he would meet with the applicant. |
Ok, so just shy of 60 years, not 70. He tag-team taught micro this fall. It was told to the kids or inferred that the guy teaching with him (McKay) is his replacement. |
| Wharton grad in the White House! |
| Business is all about risk management. If kid truly wants to major in business applying to direct admit schools is an indication that they properly understand risk management. |
The schools are being pushed to direct admit because: 1) Students and parents become angry with the university when they can't get into their preferred programs after matriculating. This creates unneeded stress and ill-will with enrolled students. 2) Business students often don't really care about the exact nature of their liberal arts distribution requirements. I know this personally because I dropped an undergrad BBA degree to focus only on liberal arts/Economics. I think business classes can develop many of the same skills as liberal arts classes. And I agree that business is a solid undergraduate track even at elite schools. But the business students rarely match the interest pattems of, say, people who go on to humanities PhDs. They are very interested in prestige jobs and acquiring the exact skills and grades needed to access them. 3) Direct admit helps to manage the amount of applications and channel them properly. This is important in the current era of overwhelming application counts. I have an MBA from Michigan. I have watched their BBA program evolve out of an LSA transfer to full direct admit program. It's been purely a demand and expectations management decision. Among other reasons, they need to make sure the LSA Economics majors really want to be Economics majors. There are plenty who do but there were also a lot rolling the dice to transfer to the BBA. I also watched as Cornell eventually decided to add undergraduate business. (I also considered Cornell for an MBA.) That was a very deliberate strategic decision and it's consistent with student interest. Looks very popular. I think that was a good decision and fits Cornell's "Any Person, Any Study" mantra. Regarding the AI analysis above, I don't think there's any need to wait for a year of college to make sure that kids are qualified to enter a business undergrad. There's nothing more special about a business program than engineering, for example. |
| Direct admit would be so much better. As it is, you have roughly 2000 kids taking microeconomics freshman year for the chance to apply to 300 McIntire spots and everyone is smart and made the cut-off to get into UVA in the first place. |