Supreme Court MoCo Ruling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

No, it was not a slap in the face to the school system.

It was a victory for parent rights. Why should children have to be exposed to concepts that are not age appropriate? What is wrong with allowing parents to opt their kids out of such instruction?

“Concepts that are not age appropriate” like marriage and families? Because most kids will be exposed to those concepts pretty early…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

Public schooling has already been destroyed. It's only a food distribution babysitting operation for impoverished, overwhelmed or confused families. Normal families are homeschooled or private.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand how forcing Muslim families to let their children read books normalizing gay families as a condition of access to a public education is "welcoming" or "holding hands." It's distinctly hostile to them, basically secular imperialism of religious households.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS was dumb to fight it.

MCPS was dumb to push it in the first place.

This is self own by liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

No, it was not a slap in the face to the school system.

It was a victory for parent rights. Why should children have to be exposed to concepts that are not age appropriate? What is wrong with allowing parents to opt their kids out of such instruction?

“Concepts that are not age appropriate” like marriage and families? Because most kids will be exposed to those concepts pretty early…

Yes, but in a more subversive way. Tbf, if my first grader had to read a book focusing on a marriage between a man and woman, I wouldn't be comfortable with that, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how forcing Muslim families to let their children read books normalizing gay families as a condition of access to a public education is "welcoming" or "holding hands." It's distinctly hostile to them, basically secular imperialism of religious households.

Libs screwed themselves pushing for Muslim immigration lolz times 100!

Now Hispanics hate taxes, LBGTQ, abortion are embracing evangelical churches and voting for Trump. Talk about trojan horse !! Lolz times a million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS was dumb to fight it.

MCPS was dumb to push it in the first place.

This is self own by liberals.

The pushback was all about the opt-out. No problem if you want to teach that in schools, just allow our child to opt out of that instruction. And the opt out push was primarily for younger elementary school kids.

Now this supreme court ruling will be used as justification in many other areas. Definitely a self own and mcps should not have pushed it to the supreme court.

[Anonymous]

It's pretty revealing that the left is now questioning the value of public education when it can't be used to force-feed progressive values into resistant religious families.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

No, it was not a slap in the face to the school system.

It was a victory for parent rights. Why should children have to be exposed to concepts that are not age appropriate? What is wrong with allowing parents to opt their kids out of such instruction?

“Concepts that are not age appropriate” like marriage and families? Because most kids will be exposed to those concepts pretty early…

Yes, but in a more subversive way. Tbf, if my first grader had to read a book focusing on a marriage between a man and woman, I wouldn't be comfortable with that, either.

You mean like every happily ever after after fairy tale?

[Anonymous]

Anyone claiming these books simply depicted same sex relationships is being dishonest.

More than one of the books explicitly discussed gender transition and at least one espoused a belief that a person’s gender can change over time. The guidance provided to teachers encouraged them to describe beliefs to the contrary as unkind.

Maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe MCPS should be teaching those materials. But let’s be honest and stop pretending like the objection was a passing reference to a gay couple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speak up. It is your right.

Should parents have a final say over what their offsping are exposed to and taught by the state?

Gee, that's a toughy.

[Anonymous]

Ufff, looks like even Sotomayor is getting pissed at KBJ's horsesheit.

It's on the Legal Insurrection website today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

No, it was not a slap in the face to the school system.

It was a victory for parent rights. Why should children have to be exposed to concepts that are not age appropriate? What is wrong with allowing parents to opt their kids out of such instruction?

“Concepts that are not age appropriate” like marriage and families? Because most kids will be exposed to those concepts pretty early…

Yes, but in a more subversive way. Tbf, if my first grader had to read a book focusing on a marriage between a man and woman, I wouldn't be comfortable with that, either.

You mean like every happily ever after after fairy tale?

Can you name a fairy tale where the primary activity is a wedding? That's like grooming children to be child brides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be a short post, I just need to vent. The MoCo ruling was a slap in the face to the public education system. First with vouchers then with this, MAGA is attempting to destroy public schooling in America. I honestly feel hopeless about this. Is there anything I can do besides give up?

No, it was not a slap in the face to the school system.

It was a victory for parent rights. Why should children have to be exposed to concepts that are not age appropriate? What is wrong with allowing parents to opt their kids out of such instruction?

“Concepts that are not age appropriate” like marriage and families? Because most kids will be exposed to those concepts pretty early…

Yes, but in a more subversive way. Tbf, if my first grader had to read a book focusing on a marriage between a man and woman, I wouldn't be comfortable with that, either.

You mean like every happily ever after after fairy tale?

Can you name a fairy tale where the primary activity is a wedding? That's like grooming children to be child brides.

How many stories have you read where in the end a gay couple is happily married? Even if the rest of the story is about working as a housekeeper to a household of men, working as a housekeeper to a mean family, getting exited about going to a party, getting kissed by a man while unconscious, getting saved by a man while trapped in a tower, etc, etc.
Don't be dense. Children are plied with stories of women needing to be saved and having a happy marriage to men as the end all be all. Being read a couple of stories about happy gay couples and trans kids - who exist as classmates and their families - is not going to cause irreparable harm, as much as Alito wants you to believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joy is the antidote. They want us to be demoralized. That's the only way they can win.

Not this again.

Ha ha. It worked so well for Kamala.

We have fascism because too many Americans didn’t like the sound of a woman laughing.