Where are the links that debunked that? pp said they read links that debunked the idea- so, where are they? |
You are being obtuse on purpose, because you are a troll, and not worth the time. But for others reading the thread there are many posts pointing out the article says nothing about it showing proof of the bible, just that things were discovered in a place mentioned in the bible. You are a very dishonest interlocutor and you should be ashamed. |
These pools, untouched for millennia, have perfectly preserved sediment layers. Hidden in their depths are records of past tsunamis and disasters linked to the Red Sed's ancient history. You fundamentally misunderstand the discovery. You call others stupid, but expect to find remains of the egyptian army in the brine pools, thousands of years later? How long do you think the remains of the egyptian army would remain recognizable, pp? A human body will become a skeleton in 2-6 months in a outdoor, warm climate. How many human bodies do researchers find on/near the Titanic? And that happened not long ago. You are dishonest, and also should not ever call anyone else stupid. That’s a very ironic statement coming from you. |
There is not a single link debunking the discovery. There are anonymous strangers who fundamentally do not understand the discovery and are injecting their own opinion. Their opinions are not based in any scientific research or discovery. For example, one poster wants to know where the remains are of the egyptian army. They don’t understand that their bodies would be disintegrated hundreds and thousands of years ago. That’s not at all someone anyone should listen to. |
No, I am not dishonest. And I called the idea stupid, not a person. In fact I pointed out you are doing it on purpose and are likely well intelligent enough to understand it provides no biblical proof. That's what makes YOU dishonest. Yeah it was an army, where are the swords? Stupid ideas. No evidence the red sea ever parted. |
The brine pools were discovered in the area Moses parted the Red Sea. The NEOM Brine Pools, as we name them, extend the known geographical range of Red Sea brine pools, and represent a unique preservational environment for the sedimentary signals of regional climatic and tectonic events. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-022-00482-x |
What happens to steel in salt water over a two thousand years? Where is your citations and links to prove there is no evidence the Red Sea ever parted? You have scientific evidence that proves the Red Sea never parted, and links to that evidence? |
No reasonable person demands proof of a negative. It’s Logic 101. |
The Red Sea possesses the highest known number of deep-sea brine pools. These are thought to arise from dissolving pockets of minerals deposited during the Miocene epoch (about 23 million to 5.3 million years ago) when the sea level in the region was lower than it is today. Does not really fit with the biblical time frame. Sea levels were very close to the current levels 1,200-1,500 years ago. The sediment core sample shows the area was covered in water. |
Same place as al the evidence that the moon never split in two. And that there are no Leprechauns. But if you need evidence, I can provide this: All of geology and physics. ‘Zat ‘nuff? |
I'm surprised that people who are Bible believers even post this stuff. If you already believe that what's in the Bible is accurate, then how can you be very impressed when modern science proves them to be true. Either you believe the Bible or you don't. Who cares what science says? Science thinks that it's not possible to do a lot of the things that are in the Bible. So what? If your faith is strong, you believe. |
DP Short history of the Red Sea. The Red Sea was formed by the Arabian Peninsula being split from the Horn of Africa by movement of the Red Sea Rift. This split started in the Eocene(56–34 million years ago) and accelerated during the Oligocene(33.9 million to 23 million years ago). Sometime during the Tertiary period, the Bab el Mandeb closed and the Red Sea evaporated to an empty hot dry salt-floored sink. As for the salt pools. In 1949, a deep water survey reported anomalously hot brines in the central portion of the Red Sea. Later work in the 1960s confirmed the presence of hot, 60 °C (140 °F), saline brines and associated metalliferous muds. The hot solutions were emanating from an active subseafloor rift. Lake Asal in Djibouti is eligible as an experimental site to study the evolution of the deep hot brines of the Red Sea. The Mediterranean is the reverse of the Red Sea in terms of plate tectonics but has been cut off, dried out and flooded. That was 5 million years ago. Mose(most scholars do not believe he existed) and the parting of the Red Sea is thought to be a weather phenomenon. Where water was pushed back lower the sea level. You can read about it here. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99580&page=1 |
Could it be.....that something natural happened in this very interesting formation 2000+ years ago that people couldn't explain so they attributed to Moses parting the sea and not the other way around, OP? Yes, that's probably the more likely scenario. :roll" |
Let me guess, Trump supporter? You'll believe anything these people tell you? |
Major floods happen all over the world, all the time. There was even flooding recently in the Sahara desert. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/14/weather/sa...esert-floods-climate |