Trump canceling flights for 1600 Afghan refugees

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the link it says that some of them were kids coming to be reunited with their families who are already here.

This is really crappy. Feel bad for those families.

He families can voluntarily go back and be with their relatives. Not a problem at all.

This. Why is that so hard to understand. Even for the illegal immigrants in the US, they can go with their parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh well. This is what people wanted. This is what they get

+1

Time for Republicans to take the baton and do the heavy lifting on helping others. Democrats are out of power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since 99% of them are men that support Afghanistan’s treatment of women, why should I care?

Prepare to be canceled for speaking the truth.

If it can be shown that a significant majority are women or young children, I will agree this is not good. But a bunch of men who support what the Taliban is doing to women? No thank you.

Spoiler alert: they won’t be women and young children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good. These “refugees” are five massive public benefits on the taxpayer dime.

So are the red “moocher” states of MAGA inbred imbeciles. Net detractors from the Federal budget.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since 99% of them are men that support Afghanistan’s treatment of women, why should I care?

Prepare to be canceled for speaking the truth.

If it can be shown that a significant majority are women or young children, I will agree this is not good. But a bunch of men who support what the Taliban is doing to women? No thank you.

Spoiler alert: they won’t be women and young children.

Agree. I still remember the picture of the hangar full of fighting aged men who rushed our military plane to be airlifted out to save themselves. Nary a woman or child in sight.

[Anonymous]

Republicans hate humanity.

[Anonymous]

The US Federal and Republican State Legislatures are busy passing laws following the Taliban.
The only problem they have with the Taliban is the name they use for God

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good. These “refugees” are five massive public benefits on the taxpayer dime.

But you're ok with your taxes for weapons to target innocent people. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since 99% of them are men that support Afghanistan’s treatment of women, why should I care?

Prepare to be canceled for speaking the truth.

If it can be shown that a significant majority are women or young children, I will agree this is not good. But a bunch of men who support what the Taliban is doing to women? No thank you.

Spoiler alert: they won’t be women and young children.

Agree. I still remember the picture of the hangar full of fighting aged men who rushed our military plane to be airlifted out to save themselves. Nary a woman or child in sight.

Exactly. I remember wondering at the time what would happen to the wives and small children of those men, given that the men wouldn’t let the women under their control take off their veils even just to run to an escape plane. I’m not sure I saw a single woman in the pictures coming out of Afghanistan. Contrast those pictures to the airlifts out of Vietnam, which were truly tragic and had a ton of women and children (perhaps even a majority women and children).

No, I don’t want more men who support Taliban views on women coming to the US, even if they are otherwise politically opposed to the Taliban.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since 99% of them are men that support Afghanistan’s treatment of women, why should I care?

Prepare to be canceled for speaking the truth.

If it can be shown that a significant majority are women or young children, I will agree this is not good. But a bunch of men who support what the Taliban is doing to women? No thank you.

Spoiler alert: they won’t be women and young children.

Agree. Let's see the statistical breakdown regarding how many of the refugees are men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. These “refugees” are five massive public benefits on the taxpayer dime.

So are the red “moocher” states of MAGA inbred imbeciles. Net detractors from the Federal budget.

Good grief. Who can even listen to your rankings. You are unhinged. You are the problem. No reasonable person cares what you actually think when you behave this way, except for those who are also unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good. These “refugees” are five massive public benefits on the taxpayer dime.

+9000000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article says 200,000 Afghans have already been resettled here. Were there that many who helped our troops? That does seem like a lot.

Oh those people are going back home. Thanks Trump!

no they're not but maybe they should be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the link it says that some of them were kids coming to be reunited with their families who are already here.

This is really crappy. Feel bad for those families.

He families can voluntarily go back and be with their relatives. Not a problem at all.

agreed!

[Anonymous]

Great! It's time for some other counties to open their door wider like we have for decades now.