FBI Raid of SJP George Mason leaders found guns, ammo, terrorist flags and "death to Jews"

[Anonymous]

This is the paradox of the Second Amendment.

When white people exercise their right to bear arms, it's just plan American.

But when the Black Panthers or SJP do it, somehow it's scary and bad.

If it were up to me, we'd have far stricter gun laws, but we don't. That means the right needs to extend to everyone, even those whose political beliefs we find abhorrent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it disgusting that you started a whole new thread about this. Your comment in the other thread didn't get enough friction? Enough already.

huh? this was news to me. Stop trying to silence news you dislike.

Stop trying to look like the g-damn victims. I should be posting daily about each and every innocent life lost in Gaza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's shocking is that our state Universities are allowing generational terrorists to attend school and probably some type of student visa. Shocking

Or domestic terrorists from Chevy Chase.

[Anonymous]

Why was no one charged with a felony when they defaced school property, causing thousands of dollars in damages? If they aren't citizens, they are criminals and should be deported.

[Anonymous]

TL/DR
a (2 I think) members of a family enrolled at the school grafittied on campus pro-palestine propaganda. Their family home was raided by FBI and LEGAL guns found in other adult bedroom (not GMU student) and they found pro-palestine propaganda. result (so far) is a band for the GMU students from returning to campus for 4 years, essentially expelling them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There were weapons, terrorist flags, and messages of "death to Jews."

https://freebeacon.com/campus/death-to-jews-inside-the-home-of-2-sjp-leaders-at-george-mason-university-police-find-guns-ammo-and-terrorist-flags/

Why are these students targeted and why did the police search their house? It is interesting that the only people who get arrested and prosecuted are people who protest against Israel’s holocaust. If you display a Nazi flag, a confederate, an Israeli flag, write you want to kill all Palestinians, kill the n-words, etc you do not get arrested. Now display a Palestinian flag, you get arrested and prosecuted under a law that has not been used in 50 years by a pro Israeli Jewish DA(like in Illinois).

How is a small country like Israel able to have people arrested in the US in violation of the US constitution? Israel is the greatest threat to the US. Something sink here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the paradox of the Second Amendment.

When white people exercise their right to bear arms, it's just plan American.

But when the Black Panthers or SJP do it, somehow it's scary and bad.

If it were up to me, we'd have far stricter gun laws, but we don't. That means the right needs to extend to everyone, even those whose political beliefs we find abhorrent.

+1

You don't get to pick who has access to guns when you make them so freely available.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG and foreign passports too!

Time to deport them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG and foreign passports too!

Time to deport them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG and foreign passports too!

Time to deport them.

Why? They have done nothing wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the paradox of the Second Amendment.

When white people exercise their right to bear arms, it's just plan American.

But when the Black Panthers or SJP do it, somehow it's scary and bad.

If it were up to me, we'd have far stricter gun laws, but we don't. That means the right needs to extend to everyone, even those whose political beliefs we find abhorrent.

What should happen is that they get expelled for criminal activity then their legal status is revoked, after that they are not allowed to have guns

Illegal migrants do not have the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court in New Orleans has ruled, rejecting arguments by a Mexican man who was convicted of illegally possessing a handgun and argued that the ban was unconstitutional.

[Anonymous]

Time to revisit this Prior to 1967, dual citizenship was not permitted in the United States. Under current US law, however, American citizens are allowed to hold dual nationality with another country.

Disallow dual citizenship and if that is found remove their legal status. Before 1967 you could lose your born and naturalized citizenship for dual:

Before 1967, the United States generally did not recognize dual citizenship, and American citizens could lose their citizenship if they took actions indicating allegiance to another country. These actions often included:

Naturalizing in a Foreign Country: If a U.S. citizen voluntarily became a citizen of another country, they were often considered to have relinquished their U.S. citizenship.

Serving in a Foreign Military: Enlisting in the armed forces of a foreign nation (especially one at odds with the U.S.) could result in the loss of U.S. citizenship.

Swearing Allegiance to Another Country: Taking an oath of allegiance to another country could also lead to a loss of citizenship.

Voting in a Foreign Election: In some cases, voting in a foreign political election was interpreted as an act of allegiance to another nation and could result in the loss of U.S. citizenship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the paradox of the Second Amendment.

When white people exercise their right to bear arms, it's just plan American.

But when the Black Panthers or SJP do it, somehow it's scary and bad.

If it were up to me, we'd have far stricter gun laws, but we don't. That means the right needs to extend to everyone, even those whose political beliefs we find abhorrent.

What should happen is that they get expelled for criminal activity then their legal status is revoked, after that they are not allowed to have guns

Illegal migrants do not have the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court in New Orleans has ruled, rejecting arguments by a Mexican man who was convicted of illegally possessing a handgun and argued that the ban was unconstitutional.

Except nothing they did was criminal. That’s why the judge rejected even a red flag hold on their guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the paradox of the Second Amendment.

When white people exercise their right to bear arms, it's just plan American.

But when the Black Panthers or SJP do it, somehow it's scary and bad.

If it were up to me, we'd have far stricter gun laws, but we don't. That means the right needs to extend to everyone, even those whose political beliefs we find abhorrent.

What should happen is that they get expelled for criminal activity then their legal status is revoked, after that they are not allowed to have guns

Illegal migrants do not have the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court in New Orleans has ruled, rejecting arguments by a Mexican man who was convicted of illegally possessing a handgun and argued that the ban was unconstitutional.

Where does it say they are illegal immigrants?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Time to revisit this Prior to 1967, dual citizenship was not permitted in the United States. Under current US law, however, American citizens are allowed to hold dual nationality with another country.

Disallow dual citizenship and if that is found remove their legal status. Before 1967 you could lose your born and naturalized citizenship for dual:

Before 1967, the United States generally did not recognize dual citizenship, and American citizens could lose their citizenship if they took actions indicating allegiance to another country. These actions often included:

Naturalizing in a Foreign Country: If a U.S. citizen voluntarily became a citizen of another country, they were often considered to have relinquished their U.S. citizenship.

Serving in a Foreign Military: Enlisting in the armed forces of a foreign nation (especially one at odds with the U.S.) could result in the loss of U.S. citizenship.

Swearing Allegiance to Another Country: Taking an oath of allegiance to another country could also lead to a loss of citizenship.

Voting in a Foreign Election: In some cases, voting in a foreign political election was interpreted as an act of allegiance to another nation and could result in the loss of U.S. citizenship.

We can go even further back in history and do away with Israel as a state and then we wouldn't even be having this conversation.