Brenda Diaz

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This school board has become so corrupt and short changes our kids out of the education they deserve. I will absolutely be voting for an outsider to come in. The fact they keep trying to smear her record in favor of a pliable 26 year old opponent shows they are scared.

Her record is few years as an mcps teacher before quitting or being fired for not showing up to class and not following the rules during a pandemic. She homeschools her youngest. She then has a bunch of jobs including an unlicensed and regulated preschool and working for fusion which is a glorified tutoring program to help struggling students with desperate parents get a diploma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This school board has become so corrupt and short changes our kids out of the education they deserve. I will absolutely be voting for an outsider to come in. The fact they keep trying to smear her record in favor of a pliable 26 year old opponent shows they are scared.

Her record is few years as an mcps teacher before quitting or being fired for not showing up to class and not following the rules during a pandemic. She homeschools her youngest. She then has a bunch of jobs including an unlicensed and regulated preschool and working for fusion which is a glorified tutoring program to help struggling students with desperate parents get a diploma.

Can you link to where she’s running an unlicensed preschool?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This school board has become so corrupt and short changes our kids out of the education they deserve. I will absolutely be voting for an outsider to come in. The fact they keep trying to smear her record in favor of a pliable 26 year old opponent shows they are scared.

Her record is few years as an mcps teacher before quitting or being fired for not showing up to class and not following the rules during a pandemic. She homeschools her youngest. She then has a bunch of jobs including an unlicensed and regulated preschool and working for fusion which is a glorified tutoring program to help struggling students with desperate parents get a diploma.

Funny how the actual news articles about her that were trying to discredit her mentioned none of this but you seem to have all this onside information.
What you don't understand, is that the rest of the school board is so defunct and awful that running a babysitting group out if a house would be an improvement over the shannigana that this board sanctions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Having kids in the system is not a prerequisite to being on the board. Only one of the current members has kids in the system now. And I think working as an MCPS teacher at the present time will give Zimmerman a unique and beneficial perspective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Don’t “both sides” this— there is a world of difference between a Moms for Liberty who never showed up for her teaching job and a current teacher who is showing up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hind sight is 20/20 and she was right about the mask.

Agree just because masking reduces the spread by 90% when everyone does it why bother. Only a few million Americans died right? /sarcasm

We were back in school with vaccinations when that happened, just like now. She was right.
There's a smear campaign against her because she isn't part of the existing problem troop.

This is only partially true. Vaccines had only been available for the age group Diaz was teaching for three months, and vaccines were still not at all available for younger siblings at the time that Diaz was willing to just skip first period rather than wear a mask.

Abdicating her responsibility to educate the children in her care, just to avoid wearing a mask, is absolutely not the mindset we want on the Board of Education.

Kids and teens did not need vaccines, as they were not at risk. Please... you are years behind at understand the research.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hind sight is 20/20 and she was right about the mask.

Agree just because masking reduces the spread by 90% when everyone does it why bother. Only a few million Americans died right? /sarcasm

We were back in school with vaccinations when that happened, just like now. She was right.
There's a smear campaign against her because she isn't part of the existing problem troop.

This is only partially true. Vaccines had only been available for the age group Diaz was teaching for three months, and vaccines were still not at all available for younger siblings at the time that Diaz was willing to just skip first period rather than wear a mask.

Abdicating her responsibility to educate the children in her care, just to avoid wearing a mask, is absolutely not the mindset we want on the Board of Education.

Kids and teens did not need vaccines, as they were not at risk. Please... you are years behind at understand the research.

LOL
Disposable children

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

Nothing is wrong with Natalie Zimmerman. She will be an informed, well-reasoned member of the board of education should she win. Having a sane, experienced teacher on the board of education is a good thing, people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Having kids in the system is not a prerequisite to being on the board. Only one of the current members has kids in the system now. And I think working as an MCPS teacher at the present time will give Zimmerman a unique and beneficial perspective.

This doesn't show what you think it shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

That’s where I am.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

Not only that, the BOE has 9 members, right? No one member can get much done unless 4 others sign on.