Porn industry coming out against project 2025

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This Project 2025 plan has as much to do with the Trump campaign as the Communist manifesto has to do with the Harris/Walz campaign.

Oh sweetie…
You lost the narrative on that lie.
The cat is already out of the bag.

[Anonymous]

And where is porn consumption highest? Well golly aw shucks gosh dang it oh fudge - the Bible belt

[Anonymous]

$100,000

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

+1 Absolutely yes!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Project 2025 plan has as much to do with the Trump campaign as the Communist manifesto has to do with the Harris/Walz campaign.

Most of Trump's inner circle of advisors are part of Project 2025, including Vance.

Many of the Project 2025 architects were also part of Trump's 2016 Transition Team and in 2016, Trump adopted 70% of their recommendations. The whole point of 2025 is that they want to come back even harder and even more aggressive with it than they did in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

I’m a former republican and believe in the free market and I don’t care what consenting adults do with their bodies. My supposition is that this effort comes from the legal part of the industry where the actors are unionized.

Naked bodies is not ipso facto trafficking or exploitation. And I think the consumers of pornography come from across the political spectrum.

- OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Seventeen pornographic film actors

17 out of millions.
In other news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This Project 2025 plan has as much to do with the Trump campaign as the Communist manifesto has to do with the Harris/Walz campaign.

That would be true if the Communist Manifesto was written by Harris and Walz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

+1 Absolutely yes!!

Who would Trump sleep with then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And where is porn consumption highest? Well golly aw shucks gosh dang it oh fudge - the Bible belt

I thought it was in the reddest state of them all, Utah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

I’m a former republican and believe in the free market and I don’t care what consenting adults do with their bodies. My supposition is that this effort comes from the legal part of the industry where the actors are unionized.

Naked bodies is not ipso facto trafficking or exploitation. And I think the consumers of pornography come from across the political spectrum.

- OP

You know very well that it's not just about "naked bodies."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

+1 Absolutely yes!!

What about gay porn?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

Are you MAGA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:$100,000

lol

100,000 dollars in goe-targeted porn sites will actually go a long way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Like Epstein?