Porn industry coming out against project 2025

[Anonymous]

Interesting. Porn industry is running anti-project 2025 ads in swing states. I’m guessing the Trump campaign would not have expected this.


Seventeen pornographic film actors on Monday announced that they had launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites warning that Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation blueprint for a Republican administration that has been a centerpiece of some Democratic campaigns — wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. The online ads will run in the states that will decide the presidency: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

The architects of the “hands off my porn” campaign are nothing if not aware of the polling. Vice President Kamala Harris is losing to former President Donald J. Trump among men, but younger men might be winnable — and pornographic websites are among the most heavily trafficked on the internet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/07/us/politics/porn-actors-project-2025-ad.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Q04.4RWB.sgMoHGlTh_pK&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

[Anonymous]

Well Kamala did go on “Call her daddy” and Howard Stern. So naturally….

[Anonymous]

this is actually pretty brilliant. Where else are disaffected white males hanging out?

(literally and fugratively)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this is actually pretty brilliant. Where else are disaffected white males hanging out?

(literally and fugratively)

OP. Yeah I had to laugh about it. Because disaffected males are not going to want to be deprived of their porn. Imagine having to go back to Playboy - for the articles of course.

[Anonymous]

Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Porn industry is running anti-project 2025 ads in swing states. I’m guessing the Trump campaign would not have expected this.


Seventeen pornographic film actors on Monday announced that they had launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites warning that Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation blueprint for a Republican administration that has been a centerpiece of some Democratic campaigns — wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. The online ads will run in the states that will decide the presidency: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

The architects of the “hands off my porn” campaign are nothing if not aware of the polling. Vice President Kamala Harris is losing to former President Donald J. Trump among men, but younger men might be winnable — and pornographic websites are among the most heavily trafficked on the internet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/07/us/politics/porn-actors-project-2025-ad.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Q04.4RWB.sgMoHGlTh_pK&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Porn is of no benefit to those who watch it or those who are demeaned by participating in it. The lowest of the low produce it

[Anonymous]

Do we really need new porn? Isn't there enough out there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

I am very familiar with that thread, as I posted many examples of Dem groomers. All deleted in support of a sick agenda to mislead people about who committed these crimes. Disgusting. The moderator should be ashamed of himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

I am very familiar with that thread, as I posted many examples of Dem groomers. All deleted in support of a sick agenda to mislead people about who committed these crimes. Disgusting. The moderator should be ashamed of himself.

I reported many of those because you kept reposting the same ones over and over, and then several, if you bothered to do even the barest double check, weren’t at all as you’d represented them.

We should all be opposed to Project 2025. The founders wanted a separation of church and state but the GOP looks at Afghanistan and says, ooh, yeah I like that.

[Anonymous]

Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

[Anonymous]

This Project 2025 plan has as much to do with the Trump campaign as the Communist manifesto has to do with the Harris/Walz campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

I believe Trump is the one who slept with a porn star, and married a soft core porn model.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This Project 2025 plan has as much to do with the Trump campaign as the Communist manifesto has to do with the Harris/Walz campaign.

Most of Trump's inner circle of advisors are part of Project 2025, including Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

I am very familiar with that thread, as I posted many examples of Dem groomers. All deleted in support of a sick agenda to mislead people about who committed these crimes. Disgusting. The moderator should be ashamed of himself.

I reported many of those because you kept reposting the same ones over and over, and then several, if you bothered to do even the barest double check, weren’t at all as you’d represented them.

We should all be opposed to Project 2025. The founders wanted a separation of church and state but the GOP looks at Afghanistan and says, ooh, yeah I like that.

You are a lying misogynist. Why are you excusing sexual abuse because the predators share your political affiliation? Heinous.

And you are also an idiot if you think only political party abuses women and children.