North Carolina removed 747k voters from rolls

[Anonymous]

How can I fill out a ballot of someone who hasn't voted if you take his name off the voter rolls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this could actually work against Trump. It's not obvious to me that his supporters won't be the ones dropped. From what I've heard, his supporters are poor whites. Therefore more likely to rent?

Quote: "the majority of those stripped from the rolls were deemed ineligible to be registered because they had moved within the state and did not register their new address"

Who cares who it works against? It's undemocratic and wrong.

[Anonymous]

This will hurt Dems. Black people that rent, young people, women. It's a crazy number of voters to remove and I wonder if there will ever be an investigation.

[Anonymous]

I think it hurts MAGAs more than Democrats, who tend to be very civic minded and keep up with things like this. The republicans are the ones not paying attention until Election Day. Screw ‘em. Let them find out when they go to the polls and they can’t vote for drumpfff. I’ll be LMAO.

[Anonymous]

There’s very little news coverage of this. Do the people removed from the voting rolls have a chance to restore themselves before the election by showing their new address or whatever?

[Anonymous]

Why do Republicans have to cheat to win?

[Anonymous]

What's wrong with removing 130k dead people? Another 200 something thousand were duplicates. I see no issue with either.

[Anonymous]

There are 20+ million illegal immigrants in this country. Many of which have government IDs and benefits. Why is any of this surprising?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Yes they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Yes they are.

No one said that. Remove the dead people. Remove the duplicates. But removing people who haven’t voted in the last two federal elections (4 years) is burdensome. Many people only vote according to the presidential cycle and certainly can miss a cycle due to work or health issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Yes they are.

No one said that. Remove the dead people. Remove the duplicates. But removing people who haven’t voted in the last two federal elections (4 years) is burdensome. Many people only vote according to the presidential cycle and certainly can miss a cycle due to work or health issues.

Nearly 290,000—a plurality—of the latest removals were duplicate registrations for voters who had moved elsewhere in the state.

The other top reasons were for inactivity in the last two federal elections (246,311) and death (130,688).

The Tar Heel State currently has more than 7.7 million registered voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Yes they are.

No one said that. Remove the dead people. Remove the duplicates. But removing people who haven’t voted in the last two federal elections (4 years) is burdensome. Many people only vote according to the presidential cycle and certainly can miss a cycle due to work or health issues.

Nearly 290,000—a plurality—of the latest removals were duplicate registrations for voters who had moved elsewhere in the state.

The other top reasons were for inactivity in the last two federal elections (246,311) and death (130,688).

The Tar Heel State currently has more than 7.7 million registered voters.

This should not be allowed. Just because a person chose not to vote in two federal elections, they should still be able to walk in for any election and vote. We should be encouraging citizens to vote and make it as easy as possible for legal citizens to vote. Making voters jump through hoops if they are an infrequent voter is truly an egregious denial of rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Yes they are.

No one said that. Remove the dead people. Remove the duplicates. But removing people who haven’t voted in the last two federal elections (4 years) is burdensome. Many people only vote according to the presidential cycle and certainly can miss a cycle due to work or health issues.

Nearly 290,000—a plurality—of the latest removals were duplicate registrations for voters who had moved elsewhere in the state.

The other top reasons were for inactivity in the last two federal elections (246,311) and death (130,688).

The Tar Heel State currently has more than 7.7 million registered voters.

This should not be allowed. Just because a person chose not to vote in two federal elections, they should still be able to walk in for any election and vote. We should be encouraging citizens to vote and make it as easy as possible for legal citizens to vote. Making voters jump through hoops if they are an infrequent voter is truly an egregious denial of rights.

Not voting in 4 years doesn't make someone an "infrequent" voter and NC is egregious in dropping people from voter rolls because of this. Plenty of people only vote every presidential election. People sometimes will skip an election if lines are very long at their polling station. I skipped an election because I had just given birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are 20+ million illegal immigrants in this country. Many of which have government IDs and benefits. Why is any of this surprising?

and exactly none of them can vote and none of them do. the illegal voting in the 2020 cycle was mostly republicans. It is all projection.

When you find proof of the massive illegal voting, let us know. to date, there has been zero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

That is not what happened and you know that

They will be sued and they will lose

Check your voter status people and vote your lives depend on it
In 2020 fact Republicans voted for dead people and cheated not Dems!

Fact republicans lied to the American people on the floor of Congress on Jan 6th and Fox paid $765 million bec they lied Newsmax just paid a billion to hide that as well.
Spare us your stupid take.