North Carolina removed 747k voters from rolls

[Anonymous]

I don’t know what the population of North Carolina is but this seems like a big number.

This must be why Trump isn’t really campaigning.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4901476-north-carolina-purges-747k-voters/amp/

[Anonymous]

That’s the goal. The Republicans were going to lose, so they’re cheating. Luckily, Republican voters everywhere love this one weird trick that the GOP keeps playing on America, and they never punish them for disenfranchising millions across the country.

[Anonymous]

It’s a little under 10% of voters

[Anonymous]

I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Why on earth would you suppose that 10% of NC voters are ineligible? That’s ludicrous on the face of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Evidence any of them are ineligible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s the goal. The Republicans were going to lose, so they’re cheating. Luckily, Republican voters everywhere love this one weird trick that the GOP keeps playing on America, and they never punish them for disenfranchising millions across the country.

The state board is run by Democrats. The voters removed were dead people, people who moved, inactive voters. Every state has to clean up its voter rolls to remove ineligible mothers.

[Anonymous]

Voters*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, are you arguing that ineligible people on the voter rolls should not be removed? That is a strange position to take. You are in favor of people voting who shouldn't be?

Why on earth would you suppose that 10% of NC voters are ineligible? That’s ludicrous on the face of it.

The article says most are people who didn’t vote in the last two elections or had moved within the state and hadn’t re-registered at the new address. Neither has to do with eligibility. The first is just not voting and the second is a paperwork issue that a state that cares about voting could fix by just sending a mailer to the new address.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s the goal. The Republicans were going to lose, so they’re cheating. Luckily, Republican voters everywhere love this one weird trick that the GOP keeps playing on America, and they never punish them for disenfranchising millions across the country.

The state board is run by Democrats. The voters removed were dead people, people who moved, inactive voters. Every state has to clean up its voter rolls to remove ineligible mothers.

Also people who moved within state and didn't register new addresses, and citizens who didn't vote in the last two elections.

[Anonymous]

I think this could actually work against Trump. It's not obvious to me that his supporters won't be the ones dropped. From what I've heard, his supporters are poor whites. Therefore more likely to rent?

Quote: "the majority of those stripped from the rolls were deemed ineligible to be registered because they had moved within the state and did not register their new address"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this could actually work against Trump. It's not obvious to me that his supporters won't be the ones dropped. From what I've heard, his supporters are poor whites.

Y'all cain't take away mah freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know what the population of North Carolina is but this seems like a big number.

This must be why Trump isn’t really campaigning.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4901476-north-carolina-purges-747k-voters/amp/

Most of them are probably old rural guys who died from smoking too much. That NC tobacco!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this could actually work against Trump. It's not obvious to me that his supporters won't be the ones dropped. From what I've heard, his supporters are poor whites. Therefore more likely to rent?

Quote: "the majority of those stripped from the rolls were deemed ineligible to be registered because they had moved within the state and did not register their new address"

That’s also young people who tend to move around and poor people in general who are black or white. This is a very bad thing for democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this could actually work against Trump. It's not obvious to me that his supporters won't be the ones dropped. From what I've heard, his supporters are poor whites. Therefore more likely to rent?

Quote: "the majority of those stripped from the rolls were deemed ineligible to be registered because they had moved within the state and did not register their new address"

That’s also young people who tend to move around and poor people in general who are black or white. This is a very bad thing for democracy.

I had a different address every year of my life between the ages of 18 and 24. This is not a good thing for Ds.