Thomas Jefferson HS National Merit Semifinalist decrease

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t we already discuss this? The number of NMSFs in FCPS and Virginia declined as well. That accounts for part of the decline at TJ.

Also, the decline in Virginia was actually an improvement in absolute scores, resulting in an increase in the NMSF cut score from 219 to 222, resulting in a lower number of NMSFs in Virginia. If TJ students are disproportionately clustered in the 219-221 range, which is plausible because TJ emphasizes math while the NMSF formula emphasizes verbal, the number of students at TJ with an NMSF selection index score of 219+ might actually have gone up.

TLDR, yoy NMSF count is not a very reliable metric of quality, especially if what you care about is math.

Do you even know how NMSFs cutoff scores are established?

DP. I don't know. Can you tell me?

Since you know how internet works, learning how google works shouldn't be a huge step.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s such a dramatic drop. And the numbers at other FCPS schools didn’t increase enough to cover the decline. It suggests that TJ’s education and experience was contributing to the success. It’s not a case of just moving these students to another school. It’s a real shame. Tj was an amazing experience for my kids (who didn’t prep to get in), with high rigor and a peer group who also loved to be challenged and learn. The admissions changes were done so haphazardly during COVID. FCPS doesn’t seem inclined to study the changes and see if it anything should be done to tweak it. And they ignore the indicators, such as this one, that the quality of the school has declined.

FCPS never admits it’s made mistakes and those mistakes just keep piling up. The huge decline in the number of NMSF at TJ speaks for itself, but people call attention to it because FCPS itself will never acknowledge it’s symptomatic of the rot within the system.

It’s what happens when a school system is no longer run by people with a commitment to academic excellence, but instead only to virtue signaling designed to appease political hacks.

“Academic excellence” is not determined by standardized test scores.

I think the true metric of “Academic Excellence” is the number of ants in your grandmother’s backyard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A culture that isn’t focused on standardized testing can only be beneficial for the students in the long run.

Beneficial to the historically low performing students who don’t value education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A culture that isn’t focused on standardized testing can only be beneficial for the students in the long run.

Beneficial to the historically low performing students who don’t value education.

DP. It's actually beneficial to everyone, including the high scoring students who feel the most pressure. They are willing to admit it. Why aren't you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t we already discuss this? The number of NMSFs in FCPS and Virginia declined as well. That accounts for part of the decline at TJ.

Also, the decline in Virginia was actually an improvement in absolute scores, resulting in an increase in the NMSF cut score from 219 to 222, resulting in a lower number of NMSFs in Virginia. If TJ students are disproportionately clustered in the 219-221 range, which is plausible because TJ emphasizes math while the NMSF formula emphasizes verbal, the number of students at TJ with an NMSF selection index score of 219+ might actually have gone up.

TLDR, yoy NMSF count is not a very reliable metric of quality, especially if what you care about is math.

Do you even know how NMSFs cutoff scores are established?

DP. I don't know. Can you tell me?

Since you know how internet works, learning how google works shouldn't be a huge step.

So you don't know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://defendinged.org/incidents/thomas-jefferson-high-schools-number-of-students-named-national-merit-semifinalists-decreases-by-over-half-year-to-year/

There were 165 semifinalists in 2024. That number decreased to 81 for 2025 merit semifinalists. While increasing enrollment from 450 to 550.

Result from going merit based admissions to equity based in 2021.

We already know the pandemic had an impact on students that resulted in learning loss. Please stop pushing your racist agenda by twisting the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s such a dramatic drop. And the numbers at other FCPS schools didn’t increase enough to cover the decline. It suggests that TJ’s education and experience was contributing to the success. It’s not a case of just moving these students to another school. It’s a real shame. Tj was an amazing experience for my kids (who didn’t prep to get in), with high rigor and a peer group who also loved to be challenged and learn. The admissions changes were done so haphazardly during COVID. FCPS doesn’t seem inclined to study the changes and see if it anything should be done to tweak it. And they ignore the indicators, such as this one, that the quality of the school has declined.

Yes, such a shame that Virginia’s raw scores have gone up, resulting in a higher cut score and a smaller number of NMSFs!

That's weird since it's much easier to get NMSF in places like VA than MD.

[Anonymous]

Let me know if you need any further help with reading or comprehension.

https://www.nationalmerit.org/s/1758/images/gid2/editor_documents/student_guide.pdf?gid=2&pgid=61#page=33

[Anonymous]

The PSAT changed fall off 2023 to a digital and adaptive test. It was NOT the same pencil and paper version. Before there was a non calculator section. Now you can use calculators on the entire test AND there is a built in graphing calculator. It is shorter and has more time per question.

These changes are probably not good for many TJ students who didn’t need extra time or an embedded graph calculator. But this allowed other students to do as well as some TJ students.

So you cannot directly compare digital and paper and pencil PSAT results to comment on cohorts.

[Anonymous]

Many of the "new" TJ students are not serious students. It does make it less stressful but you now have many who are unprepared for a rigorous curriculum. The top colleges are seeing the same which is why they are going back to test scores. The best teachers will leave without excellent students.

[Anonymous]

The caliber composition of TJ class has shifted in the last four years. While there is representation from lower-performing schools, there isn't enough support for students who start with deficient math and English skills. The principal of TJ has mentioned that ALEKS is being offered upfront for freshmen to address the gaps in middle school math, but more remedial resources are necessary. If TJ aims to provide effective and timely remedial assistance, a comprehensive support system with full-time dedicated staff is required. It’s counterproductive to let students struggle with poor grades and then downplay the significance of Cs and Ds, suggesting that GPA isn’t all that important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s such a dramatic drop. And the numbers at other FCPS schools didn’t increase enough to cover the decline. It suggests that TJ’s education and experience was contributing to the success. It’s not a case of just moving these students to another school. It’s a real shame. Tj was an amazing experience for my kids (who didn’t prep to get in), with high rigor and a peer group who also loved to be challenged and learn. The admissions changes were done so haphazardly during COVID. FCPS doesn’t seem inclined to study the changes and see if it anything should be done to tweak it. And they ignore the indicators, such as this one, that the quality of the school has declined.

Yes, such a shame that Virginia’s raw scores have gone up, resulting in a higher cut score and a smaller number of NMSFs!

Say you don't know how NMSF are selected without saying you don't know how NMSF are selected.

The top X% of students in a state get NMSF. This percentage doesn't change. The total number of NMSF in virginia didn't change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s such a dramatic drop. And the numbers at other FCPS schools didn’t increase enough to cover the decline. It suggests that TJ’s education and experience was contributing to the success. It’s not a case of just moving these students to another school. It’s a real shame. Tj was an amazing experience for my kids (who didn’t prep to get in), with high rigor and a peer group who also loved to be challenged and learn. The admissions changes were done so haphazardly during COVID. FCPS doesn’t seem inclined to study the changes and see if it anything should be done to tweak it. And they ignore the indicators, such as this one, that the quality of the school has declined.

FCPS never admits it’s made mistakes and those mistakes just keep piling up. The huge decline in the number of NMSF at TJ speaks for itself, but people call attention to it because FCPS itself will never acknowledge it’s symptomatic of the rot within the system.

It’s what happens when a school system is no longer run by people with a commitment to academic excellence, but instead only to virtue signaling designed to appease political hacks.

“Academic excellence” is not determined by standardized test scores.

It is certainly one very good indicator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A culture that isn’t focused on standardized testing can only be beneficial for the students in the long run.

Beneficial to the historically low performing students who don’t value education.

DP. It's actually beneficial to everyone, including the high scoring students who feel the most pressure. They are willing to admit it. Why aren't you?

Those high scoring students at TJ are not competing with the low scoring students at TJ per se. They are competing with the high scoring students everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t we already discuss this? The number of NMSFs in FCPS and Virginia declined as well. That accounts for part of the decline at TJ.

Also, the decline in Virginia was actually an improvement in absolute scores, resulting in an increase in the NMSF cut score from 219 to 222, resulting in a lower number of NMSFs in Virginia. If TJ students are disproportionately clustered in the 219-221 range, which is plausible because TJ emphasizes math while the NMSF formula emphasizes verbal, the number of students at TJ with an NMSF selection index score of 219+ might actually have gone up.

TLDR, yoy NMSF count is not a very reliable metric of quality, especially if what you care about is math.

Do you even know how NMSFs cutoff scores are established?

DP. I don't know. Can you tell me?

Since you know how internet works, learning how google works shouldn't be a huge step.

So you don't know.

DP here. It's a percentile. The top X% get NMSF.

https://www.collegevine.com/faq/53783/understanding-national-merit-finalist-cutoffs