Point taken about the class size. But the point still stands (from the misconception on the other thread) that almost all of the class is not from top schools. And this 147 you speak of - you know it’s only 1 person from each of these schools? |
Ha! This right here. |
Plenty of people would be plenty fine with Goldman. |
|
Imagine if we could answer questions in more nuanced, less black-and-white ways.
For example, when asked whether where you go to undergraduate matters, perhaps the answer is "Somewhat but 1) not nearly as much as many people think; and 2) more for some career paths than others." |
I would add that when it does matter the benefit fades with time. |
OP here. I’m down with that. My original intent was just to show some peeps on the other thread that they were basically talking out of their a$$. |
| Everyone agrees that undergrad doesn't matter for law school, until you realize their child goes to Amherst for the resources and alumni network that leads to...becoming a lawyer. |
Are you saying that a student is just as likely to get into HLS from a non-top school as someone who attends a top school, all else being equal? |
Good job. Some of the people on this board are idiots. |
I would imagine that a student from a directional state school with the same grades and LSAT would have a better chance of being admitted to HLS than a Harvard undergrad student. Of course, besides that HLS admits students from a wide number of colleges, we are dealing with mainly conjecture without more information. |
cough, diversity admits, cough |
|
An impressive undergrad can act as a backstop, though. I started my law career with a kid who went to Yale for undergrad (very rich family, legacy, donors, etc) but did terribly and ended up at a third-tier law school. Due to a combination of connections and having Yale on his transcript he got offers from several V25 firms.
He would introduce himself as a "Yale Man" which was really ridiculous but worked on the old white guys it was supposed to work on. He's a partner now. |
The only reason it seems that way is because A) those who can afford to attend a "top law school" are often the same ones who could afford to attend a Top undergrad. The kids who turned down T50 undergrads for financial reasons are likely also attending law schools that are also more affordable to them. Med school and Law school (and most health professional programs) are solely based on high MCAT/LSAT/Scores and GPA. The smart HS kids who went to non-T50 undergrads likely excelled at undergrad and will get into top professional programs as well. It's just there are not as many kids from Schools ranked 100+ who will even have Harvard Law on their radar. |
How do you now this? How do you know that only 1 student came from each of the 147 schools listed? |