Looking to 2028

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins in November., there won't be an election in 2028 unless Trump dies that year.

There will be an election, but Trump's DOJ will actually attempt to seize voting machines. In some states, they will do so easily. In others, there will be armed standoffs between state and federal authorities, like when states refused to implement the CRA in the 60s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It won’t be Buttigieg since LGTBQ folks will be under house arrest by then.

I’m guessing Whitmer vs. Vance. Or maybe Don Jr.

A Trump WH will harm the community, but this hyperbole doesn't help.

Well admittedly I was being sarcastic. But I do think we are entering a big freeze for LGBTQ rights and even societal acceptance, which would make the candidacy of a gay person non viable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins in November., there won't be an election in 2028 unless Trump dies that year.

There will be an election, but Trump's DOJ will actually attempt to seize voting machines. In some states, they will do so easily. In others, there will be armed standoffs between state and federal authorities, like when states refused to implement the CRA in the 60s.

You mean like last time when cartons of Biden ballots magically appeared from under the tables after R watchers were forced to leave?? ….ALL documented on VIDEO.

This is why Democrats are FIGHTING election integrity. They can’t win without cheating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins in November., there won't be an election in 2028 unless Trump dies that year.

There will be an election, but Trump's DOJ will actually attempt to seize voting machines. In some states, they will do so easily. In others, there will be armed standoffs between state and federal authorities, like when states refused to implement the CRA in the 60s.

You mean like last time when cartons of Biden ballots magically appeared from under the tables after R watchers were forced to leave?? ….ALL documented on VIDEO.

This is why Democrats are FIGHTING election integrity. They can’t win without cheating.

Show the video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump loses, there are no "Republicans" I can think of who could win in '28. The current crop of GOP darlings are all a bunch of spineless Trump acolytes. People tend to remember that.

There needs to be a post-watergate cleansing and reconfiguration of the GOP. Perhaps going center right and trying to capture a pro-choice/pro-environment middle and leave the progressive to the Dems, but at some point, the era of kowtowing to the religious fanatics and racists in our country has to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins there won’t be a 2028 election, because the Supreme Court recently allowed presidents broad and complete immunity from “official acts”. Trump co would find a way to ensure Republicans won in 2028 “for the good of the country” and could very easily do it covertly with these sweeping new powers. So yeah, no, with our new monarchy system things are pretty bad.

Anything Trump deems an offiicial act wold be such - voter suppression, rigging election boxes, canceling voter registration of non-GOP - you name it.

SCOTUS said it all legal.

Not hyerbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins there won’t be a 2028 election, because the Supreme Court recently allowed presidents broad and complete immunity from “official acts”. Trump co would find a way to ensure Republicans won in 2028 “for the good of the country” and could very easily do it covertly with these sweeping new powers. So yeah, no, with our new monarchy system things are pretty bad.

Anything Trump deems an offiicial act wold be such - voter suppression, rigging election boxes, canceling voter registration of non-GOP - you name it.

SCOTUS said it all legal.

Not hyerbole.

Fraud is still illegal. Interfering with the civil rights of others is still illegal. But Trump talking about fraud with his aides in the Oval Office...that can't be the basis of an investigation. That can't lead to a charge of conspiracy.

I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins there won’t be a 2028 election, because the Supreme Court recently allowed presidents broad and complete immunity from “official acts”. Trump co would find a way to ensure Republicans won in 2028 “for the good of the country” and could very easily do it covertly with these sweeping new powers. So yeah, no, with our new monarchy system things are pretty bad.

Anything Trump deems an offiicial act wold be such - voter suppression, rigging election boxes, canceling voter registration of non-GOP - you name it.

SCOTUS said it all legal.

Not hyerbole.

Fraud is still illegal. Interfering with the civil rights of others is still illegal. But Trump talking about fraud with his aides in the Oval Office...that can't be the basis of an investigation. That can't lead to a charge of conspiracy.

I think.

Only if it's not an official act. And by the time anyone begins to prosecute it, it'll be years down the road. If they're not pardoned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins there won’t be a 2028 election, because the Supreme Court recently allowed presidents broad and complete immunity from “official acts”. Trump co would find a way to ensure Republicans won in 2028 “for the good of the country” and could very easily do it covertly with these sweeping new powers. So yeah, no, with our new monarchy system things are pretty bad.

LOL. The media gets people to believe anything. SCOTUS ruling only confirmed current policy and what is obvious. The legal system does not interfere with what should be the executive branch’s powers. However Congress can still make laws and impeach a president. People should pay more attention in Civics class if they still teach it.

Bolded is patently false. Read the actual decision including the footnotes and stop listening to Fox News.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It won’t be Buttigieg since LGTBQ folks will be under house arrest by then.

I’m guessing Whitmer vs. Vance. Or maybe Don Jr.

A Trump WH will harm the community, but this hyperbole doesn't help.

It isn't hyperbole.

They have already said they will round up "illegal" immigrants. Guess what, they won't look like Melania. They will look like "Mexicans" and "they" won't be able to tell the external difference between legal and illegal humans.

And then as the poem goes, then they will come after...

They are telling us EXACTLY what they will do. Listen to Trump's speeches, read Project 2025, listen to the Bannons and other Trump inner circle. They aren't kidding around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It won’t be Buttigieg since LGTBQ folks will be under house arrest by then.

I’m guessing Whitmer vs. Vance. Or maybe Don Jr.

A Trump WH will harm the community, but this hyperbole doesn't help.

It isn't hyperbole.

They have already said they will round up "illegal" immigrants. Guess what, they won't look like Melania. They will look like "Mexicans" and "they" won't be able to tell the external difference between legal and illegal humans.

And then as the poem goes, then they will come after...

They are telling us EXACTLY what they will do. Listen to Trump's speeches, read Project 2025, listen to the Bannons and other Trump inner circle. They aren't kidding around.

What do people who have no legal right to be in the USA have to do with LGBTQ people who are US citizens?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins in November., there won't be an election in 2028 unless Trump dies that year.

There will be an election, but Trump's DOJ will actually attempt to seize voting machines. In some states, they will do so easily. In others, there will be armed standoffs between state and federal authorities, like when states refused to implement the CRA in the 60s.

You mean like last time when cartons of Biden ballots magically appeared from under the tables after R watchers were forced to leave?? ….ALL documented on VIDEO.

This is why Democrats are FIGHTING election integrity. They can’t win without cheating.

You understand this was all debunked in courts of law, right? Why are you still spouting these absolute lies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump wins there won’t be a 2028 election, because the Supreme Court recently allowed presidents broad and complete immunity from “official acts”. Trump co would find a way to ensure Republicans won in 2028 “for the good of the country” and could very easily do it covertly with these sweeping new powers. So yeah, no, with our new monarchy system things are pretty bad.

Anything Trump deems an offiicial act wold be such - voter suppression, rigging election boxes, canceling voter registration of non-GOP - you name it.

SCOTUS said it all legal.

Not hyerbole.

Fraud is still illegal. Interfering with the civil rights of others is still illegal. But Trump talking about fraud with his aides in the Oval Office...that can't be the basis of an investigation. That can't lead to a charge of conspiracy.

I think.

They won't be illegal if Trump deems "official acts" - so it is effectively legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It won’t be Buttigieg since LGTBQ folks will be under house arrest by then.

I’m guessing Whitmer vs. Vance. Or maybe Don Jr.

A Trump WH will harm the community, but this hyperbole doesn't help.

It isn't hyperbole.

They have already said they will round up "illegal" immigrants. Guess what, they won't look like Melania. They will look like "Mexicans" and "they" won't be able to tell the external difference between legal and illegal humans.

And then as the poem goes, then they will come after...

They are telling us EXACTLY what they will do. Listen to Trump's speeches, read Project 2025, listen to the Bannons and other Trump inner circle. They aren't kidding around.

What do people who have no legal right to be in the USA have to do with LGBTQ people who are US citizens?

You don't get it. The goal here is to create a white, Christian Nationalist country with women being subjugated.

Not Christian? Outsider.
Not white? Outsider.
Not straight? Outsider.
Not male? Baby machine.

Legal rights will no longer matter. How quaint that you aren't getting the GOP agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It won’t be Buttigieg since LGTBQ folks will be under house arrest by then.

I’m guessing Whitmer vs. Vance. Or maybe Don Jr.

A Trump WH will harm the community, but this hyperbole doesn't help.

It isn't hyperbole.

They have already said they will round up "illegal" immigrants. Guess what, they won't look like Melania. They will look like "Mexicans" and "they" won't be able to tell the external difference between legal and illegal humans.

And then as the poem goes, then they will come after...

They are telling us EXACTLY what they will do. Listen to Trump's speeches, read Project 2025, listen to the Bannons and other Trump inner circle. They aren't kidding around.

What do people who have no legal right to be in the USA have to do with LGBTQ people who are US citizens?

You don't get it. The goal here is to create a white, Christian Nationalist country with women being subjugated.

Not Christian? Outsider.
Not white? Outsider.
Not straight? Outsider.
Not male? Baby machine.

Legal rights will no longer matter. How quaint that you aren't getting the GOP agenda.

Of course that's the goal of many people. The Bill of Rights stands in the way though. You're still not answering specific questions.

How will queer US citizens be placed under house arrest? What will the mechanism be?