I wonder what neighborhood this was (Alito's wife chasing and spitting on a neighbor's car)?

[Anonymous]

A neighbirhood I don't want to live in!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The idea that a supreme court justice's wife would chase a neighbor's car and spit at them. i don't know but of all the news lately, that is the most shocking to me. That's the behavior of a meth addict or homeless mentally ill person, not a SUPREME COURT JUSTICE's spouse. I mean just wow.

It is very low class behavior and obviously this lady has a problem. But what does the crazy behavior of his wife have to do with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You do know the chick claiming all of this is an actress, right?

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3881828/

Even if true, so what? She showed the Post contemporaneous texts with friends and this happened several years ago so she's not in it for publicity.

OK!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bill’s bad behavior took place behind closed doors. The Alitos proudly display their bad behavior in front of their houses for all to see. Bill didn’t support insurrections and the Alitos do. It’s a little different.

Hillary Clinton publicly smeared women who later proved to have had sexual interactions with Bill Clinton.

I don’t want to derail any of this, but I notice a huge double standard and it seems that the liberal position now is that husbands and wives represent one person. Not two independent people. I am not an expert but this seems like a step backwards for women’s rights.

Hillary paid a price for that bullying. She was trounced at the ballot box. I don't think many of us believe Bill and Hillary are immaculate people.

But you are barking up the wrong tree, because there is no comparison here. None at all. The Alitos appear to be complicit in election denialism and insurrection. The Justices are Constitutionally mandated to avoid even the appearance of bias. They have just been shown to display extreme bias, both Alitos as well as Ginny Thomas. Alito did not remove his wife's flags. Ginny's texts proved she was heavily involved in efforts to subvert the election. If they were separated or divorced, both wives' views would be protected by the First Amendment. As the wives of Supreme Court Justices, the appearance of bias supercede their right to express political views.

Thus - both Alito and Thomas should recuse themselves from matters pertaining to Jan 6.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You do know the chick claiming all of this is an actress, right?

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3881828/

Even if true, so what? She showed the Post contemporaneous texts with friends and this happened several years ago so she's not in it for publicity.

That woman and her husband are also certainly neighborhood drama queens. Their 911 call was ridiculous. She admits to calling Alito’s wife explicatives. She is intentionally vague about the order of their interactions and very likely was a mutual instigator. Does not absolve Alito’s wife, because she is nutso but there is only one side of the story being reported and it would be equally appropriate for the media to interrogate these folks a little more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bias and don’t you dam say he’s not biased .

If he was legit he’d recuse this is not hard

They are both free to fly their crap freak flags it’s not ok to be biased

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bill’s bad behavior took place behind closed doors. The Alitos proudly display their bad behavior in front of their houses for all to see. Bill didn’t support insurrections and the Alitos do. It’s a little different.

Hillary Clinton publicly smeared women who later proved to have had sexual interactions with Bill Clinton.

I don’t want to derail any of this, but I notice a huge double standard and it seems that the liberal position now is that husbands and wives represent one person. Not two independent people. I am not an expert but this seems like a step backwards for women’s rights.

Hillary paid a price for that bullying. She was trounced at the ballot box. I don't think many of us believe Bill and Hillary are immaculate people.

But you are barking up the wrong tree, because there is no comparison here. None at all. The Alitos appear to be complicit in election denialism and insurrection. The Justices are Constitutionally mandated to avoid even the appearance of bias. They have just been shown to display extreme bias, both Alitos as well as Ginny Thomas. Alito did not remove his wife's flags. Ginny's texts proved she was heavily involved in efforts to subvert the election. If they were separated or divorced, both wives' views would be protected by the First Amendment. As the wives of Supreme Court Justices, the appearance of bias supercede their right to express political views.

Thus - both Alito and Thomas should recuse themselves from matters pertaining to Jan 6.

You keep saying the “Alito’s” but what has the Supreme Court Justice done exactly? His wife has done something. There are zero reports of his involvement in any of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bias and don’t you dam say he’s not biased .

If he was legit he’d recuse this is not hard

They are both free to fly their crap freak flags it’s not ok to be biased

I think there is a lot of evidence that Alito is a partisan hack, but not from this incident. How does this incident prove that the justice is biased? Where is your proof that he is involved?

[Anonymous]

Has there ever been such a corrupt court?

Why do conservatives hate America and all that it stands for?

Why are their men so willing to throw their wives under the bus?

Disgraceful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bill’s bad behavior took place behind closed doors. The Alitos proudly display their bad behavior in front of their houses for all to see. Bill didn’t support insurrections and the Alitos do. It’s a little different.

Hillary Clinton publicly smeared women who later proved to have had sexual interactions with Bill Clinton.

I don’t want to derail any of this, but I notice a huge double standard and it seems that the liberal position now is that husbands and wives represent one person. Not two independent people. I am not an expert but this seems like a step backwards for women’s rights.

Hillary paid a price for that bullying. She was trounced at the ballot box. I don't think many of us believe Bill and Hillary are immaculate people.

But you are barking up the wrong tree, because there is no comparison here. None at all. The Alitos appear to be complicit in election denialism and insurrection. The Justices are Constitutionally mandated to avoid even the appearance of bias. They have just been shown to display extreme bias, both Alitos as well as Ginny Thomas. Alito did not remove his wife's flags. Ginny's texts proved she was heavily involved in efforts to subvert the election. If they were separated or divorced, both wives' views would be protected by the First Amendment. As the wives of Supreme Court Justices, the appearance of bias supercede their right to express political views.

Thus - both Alito and Thomas should recuse themselves from matters pertaining to Jan 6.

You keep saying the “Alito’s” but what has the Supreme Court Justice done exactly? His wife has done something. There are zero reports of his involvement in any of this.

What part of it's HIS house aren't you comprehending?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bill’s bad behavior took place behind closed doors. The Alitos proudly display their bad behavior in front of their houses for all to see. Bill didn’t support insurrections and the Alitos do. It’s a little different.

Hillary Clinton publicly smeared women who later proved to have had sexual interactions with Bill Clinton.

I don’t want to derail any of this, but I notice a huge double standard and it seems that the liberal position now is that husbands and wives represent one person. Not two independent people. I am not an expert but this seems like a step backwards for women’s rights.

Hillary paid a price for that bullying. She was trounced at the ballot box. I don't think many of us believe Bill and Hillary are immaculate people.

But you are barking up the wrong tree, because there is no comparison here. None at all. The Alitos appear to be complicit in election denialism and insurrection. The Justices are Constitutionally mandated to avoid even the appearance of bias. They have just been shown to display extreme bias, both Alitos as well as Ginny Thomas. Alito did not remove his wife's flags. Ginny's texts proved she was heavily involved in efforts to subvert the election. If they were separated or divorced, both wives' views would be protected by the First Amendment. As the wives of Supreme Court Justices, the appearance of bias supercede their right to express political views.

Thus - both Alito and Thomas should recuse themselves from matters pertaining to Jan 6.

You keep saying the “Alito’s” but what has the Supreme Court Justice done exactly? His wife has done something. There are zero reports of his involvement in any of this.

What part of it's HIS house aren't you comprehending?

I guess we are back to the days when all marital property belongs to the husband? Is this really what you folks want to argue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has there ever been such a corrupt court?

Why do conservatives hate America and all that it stands for?

Why are their men so willing to throw their wives under the bus?

Disgraceful.

There have been several times in history when the court’s integrity was compromised. So this is not the first and it won’t be the last.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bias and don’t you dam say he’s not biased .

If he was legit he’d recuse this is not hard

They are both free to fly their crap freak flags it’s not ok to be biased

Why don’t you think that his wife is fully capable of free will to have her own political opinions independent of her husband?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly don’t understand how Alito’s behavior reflects on his wife and his wife’s behavior reflects on him.

I thought we already covered this with Bill and Hillary.

Bias and don’t you dam say he’s not biased .

If he was legit he’d recuse this is not hard

They are both free to fly their crap freak flags it’s not ok to be biased

I think there is a lot of evidence that Alito is a partisan hack, but not from this incident. How does this incident prove that the justice is biased? Where is your proof that he is involved?

It doesn't prove he is biased. It is evidence of possible bias. Which is why he should recuse himself.

I wish he'd make the same allowance for women's autonomy over their own bodies as he does for women's autonomy over flag poles they co-own, but that's a separate issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s on Greenway Rd

Google street view shows a house on Greenway that is blurred out but you can still see a big old flag pole out front.