| UVA is still too high. |
|
Go UVA,!!!!!!! You're the best! I love you so much!!!!
|
California publics sound good on paper. But look deeper & you find: Undergrads will probably rarely encounter any of those Nobel Prize winners. Most out of state students won’t be able to afford them. Except for UCLA basketball, most of those NCAA championships have come in obscure sports few people watch. So, minimal impact on average undergrad. Football teams still suck. Off-campus housing is usually very expensive & often dilapidated. And of course there are problems with crime, protests, and getting the courses you need. So, don’t burn those UMBC & JMU T-shirts just yet. Nothing new to see here. Move along please. |
OP here: The headline is directly from the cited Newspaper which you would have known had you bothered to check before going on your capitalized ignorant rant. You sound like a product of a 3rd rate U.S. educational system. |
Why do you capitalize newspaper? FYI, Daily Mail is a tabloid, not a legit newspaper. |
|
California schools do well on the list because return on investment is high and CA has made a focused effort to reduce reliance on student loans as much as possible. Your odds of getting into a UC are 3x higher if you come in from a community college, so that has become a very preferred path for lots of students (even those coming out of HS with an A-average and lots of AP credits). This, of course, drastically lowers the 4 year cost of attaining a bachelors degree, which in turn boosts your ROI.
Also, salaries in California are high so that improves UC schools' performance in the ratings. Look at the methodology: https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawhitford/2023/08/29/how-we-rank-americas-best-colleges/?sh=73257c03294e
UCs will do really well on components that make up 50% of the methodology - salary, debt, ROI. |
What you stated is very accurate. Imo research facilities do not matter much at a large state school for undergrad—your undergrad is not likely to be able to take advantage of that—but at smaller privates undergrads get more opportunities to do research Also the taking more than 4 years to graduate is accurate—often because you cannot get the classes you need. Many Berkeley kids take the electives they can get into for cs, not the courses they want. Or they take 5 years |
My VA kid graduated from Berkeley in 3 years (no summer schools) with a double major. No problem with classes. |
Please name the majors. Thank you in advance ! |
Computer Science and Economics. |
Unless you live in California, OP's premise isn't even remotely true |
CS major or engineering major? Please list your VA kid's major |
I see OP is a student of ancient history. 1989 for football, 1974 for the NBA, never for the MLB, never for the NHL. |
DP here. My OOS DD will graduate in June from UCLA in four years in Cognitive Science and Entrepreneurship. She was also able to study abroad and still graduate on time. Her huge friend group are all graduating in four years with majors ranging from Engineering, CS, Applied Math, Neuroscience, Business Economics etc. You can see the graduation rates here: https://apb.ucla.edu/campus-statistics/graduation-ttd Keep in mind, that UCLA has a very high percentage of first gen and low-income students, many of whom have to work while studying, and that affects how long it takes them to graduate. That said, my DD would admit that it is a bit of a blood bath every quarter registering for classes, but in the end, she has always gotten the classes she needed on time. |
I know this thread is public school-focused, and UCLA's athletic program is undoubtedly accomplished, but in the same state you have Stanford with more NCAA titles and Olympic medals. Plus four #1 overall picks in the NFL draft and one in the MLB draft. |