springfield district school board options

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s telling that Tisler’s biggest donor is one of Anderson’s neighbors, and there are as many Tisler signs as Anderson signs in Anderson’s neighborhood. Take from that what you will, but clearly not a group that rallies around a neighbor that they’ve seen at work.

Anderson? She is in Mason, not Springfield.

She’s in Springfield vs Tisler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s telling that Tisler’s biggest donor is one of Anderson’s neighbors, and there are as many Tisler signs as Anderson signs in Anderson’s neighborhood. Take from that what you will, but clearly not a group that rallies around a neighbor that they’ve seen at work.

Anderson? She is in Mason, not Springfield.

She’s in Springfield vs Tisler.

Oh, sorry! I was thinking of Ricardy Anderson. So there might be two Andersons on the board? Confusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s telling that Tisler’s biggest donor is one of Anderson’s neighbors, and there are as many Tisler signs as Anderson signs in Anderson’s neighborhood. Take from that what you will, but clearly not a group that rallies around a neighbor that they’ve seen at work.

Anderson? She is in Mason, not Springfield.

Ricardy Anderson is a current school board member representing the Mason district. The conversation here is about the Springfield candidates, and that Anderson is Sandy Anderson.

[Anonymous]

Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tisler is extremely anti-trans rights.

Oh yes, Anderson is vocal on trans rights but silent on Jewish and Palestinian rights. It’s like she’s waiting on instruction for which group her donors want her to support. That’s exactly what we need. More politicians who have no spine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Be careful what you wish for. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic. Many people would say the same thing about Anderson.

Maybe nobody is qualified for the job. Maybe anyone who is good realizes its not worth being in the cesspool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Thank you for sharing. And thank you for all you’ve done as a teacher. When people ask why it’s so hard to be a teacher or principal in FCPS, they need to be shown this post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Thank you for sharing. And thank you for all you’ve done as a teacher. When people ask why it’s so hard to be a teacher or principal in FCPS, they need to be shown this post.

Perhaps, but a divisive board that pits parents and teachers against each other has been a disaster. The board needs balance. One party rule is typically a disaster. Fcps and BOS is no exception.

[Anonymous]

We currently have a financially and technologically illiterate PTA mom representing Springfield. LJC fails to understand a $3.6 billion organization and continues to focus on political issues instead of academics, students, or FCPS employees. LJC was elected only because Elizabeth Schultz is an even bigger nutjob, who's only position on the SB was to create conflict, dissent and chaos. (Was ES awarded a seat in Richmond for her role on the SB? She's lost a lot of weight, had plastic surgery and she's QUIET? What's going on?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We currently have a financially and technologically illiterate PTA mom representing Springfield. LJC fails to understand a $3.6 billion organization and continues to focus on political issues instead of academics, students, or FCPS employees. LJC was elected only because Elizabeth Schultz is an even bigger nutjob, whose only position on the SB was to create conflict, dissent and chaos. (Was ES awarded a seat in Richmond for her role on the SB? She's lost a lot of weight, had plastic surgery and she's QUIET? What's going on?)

And this is exactly what you’ll get with any one of the republicans running. If they get even 1 seat they’ll use it to wreak havoc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Thank you for sharing. And thank you for all you’ve done as a teacher. When people ask why it’s so hard to be a teacher or principal in FCPS, they need to be shown this post.

Perhaps, but a divisive board that pits parents and teachers against each other has been a disaster. The board needs balance. One party rule is typically a disaster. Fcps and BOS is no exception.

If republicans actually cared about getting things done they wouldn’t have endorsed wife beaters, insurrectionists, and “vaccines cause autism” kooks.

Republicans blew it this go around. Better luck in 2027.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We currently have a financially and technologically illiterate PTA mom representing Springfield. LJC fails to understand a $3.6 billion organization and continues to focus on political issues instead of academics, students, or FCPS employees. LJC was elected only because Elizabeth Schultz is an even bigger nutjob, whose only position on the SB was to create conflict, dissent and chaos. (Was ES awarded a seat in Richmond for her role on the SB? She's lost a lot of weight, had plastic surgery and she's QUIET? What's going on?)

And this is exactly what you’ll get with any one of the republicans running. If they get even 1 seat they’ll use it to wreak havoc.

Who is ljc endorsing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Thank you for sharing. And thank you for all you’ve done as a teacher. When people ask why it’s so hard to be a teacher or principal in FCPS, they need to be shown this post.

Perhaps, but a divisive board that pits parents and teachers against each other has been a disaster. The board needs balance. One party rule is typically a disaster. Fcps and BOS is no exception.

If republicans actually cared about getting things done they wouldn’t have endorsed wife beaters, insurrectionists, and “vaccines cause autism” kooks.

Republicans blew it this go around. Better luck in 2027.

The party in charge is responsible for our disasterous results, $9m in legal fees each year, and unsustainable tax obligations. The dems are doing a great job destroying fcps without any help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

OMG! Which school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please not Tisler. Literally anyone else—I’d rather a rabid raccoon than Tisler.

One of her children was in my class and it was hell. I was not allowed to contact her about anything without first running my email by a lawyer and administrator because every email home resulted in legal threats and 659363 meetings.

She tried to get every single administrator and special education teacher in the school fired. These were good, experienced teachers who ended up quitting and moving schools just to not have to deal with her the following year. She sued FCPS multiple times just in the 9 months I had her child. I was part of 7 FOIAs in 1 year from her alone.

My admin was unable to deal with anything else that year because she was in at least 6 hours a week of meetings with Tisler. Every week. Every meeting ended the same, with Tisler angry, threatening people, and demanding people be fired. I have never seen so many grown adults cry after interacting with her. She is mean, unreasonable, and frankly—psychotic.

I wish I was exaggerating, but I’m 99% certain the woman’s goal is to bring down FCPS and get private school vouchers. The thought of her on the school board is enough to send me into cold sweat. If she’s in charge, staff is going to bleed. She is going to destroy things for the school system and be happy about it.

And that’s not even mentioning the moms for Liberty endorsement.

Thank you for sharing. And thank you for all you’ve done as a teacher. When people ask why it’s so hard to be a teacher or principal in FCPS, they need to be shown this post.

Perhaps, but a divisive board that pits parents and teachers against each other has been a disaster. The board needs balance. One party rule is typically a disaster. Fcps and BOS is no exception.

If republicans actually cared about getting things done they wouldn’t have endorsed wife beaters, insurrectionists, and “vaccines cause autism” kooks.

Republicans blew it this go around. Better luck in 2027.

The party in charge is responsible for our disasterous results, $9m in legal fees each year, and unsustainable tax obligations. The dems are doing a great job destroying fcps without any help.

Don’t forget about keeping schools closed for over a year. Our kids may never catch up. And by the way, their argument was bs. There’s more Covid going around now than there was in 2020. Like all non-leaders, they were following the crowd then and now.