Police and courts needs to be tough on crime. This is not a joke. |
You want a Congress that can't tie its own shoes to be in charge of DC? Have you been paying any attention at all to the Hill? If you think Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and James Comer are the adults, you are in for a rude awakening. |
Paris or London or LA are no different but that's not an excuse. DC proper is small. |
Really? A few congressman have been shot in the past few years, some severely wounded, and Rs still didn't do a dam! thing about the easy access to gun control. Rather, some R states have made carrying guns easier. |
Really? Do you want to compare crime rates in Paris and London to DC? |
I live and work in DC and am as invested in you in this issue if not more so, but this is total nonsense courtesy of Tucker Carlson. No serious observer who actually cares enough about crime and justice in DC to understand the facts would write such a thing. For those with the integrity to acknowledge that they may not be as well educated about what actually happened as they would like to be, this is about as good a summary as I’ve seen: https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-crime/the-war-on-cities And if you sneer at that article because it’s in The New Yorker, you are exactly the type of person who should be reading it. |
Meanwhile Reddit’s Washington DC thread locked this topic, lol. Bury your heads! Our policies are working! Progressive criminal justice is a success story! Don’t talk about it! Don’t believe your eyes or ears! If we lessen penalties, don’t prosecute, let dangerous criminals out in the community, it will all work! Right, Charles Allen and city council???? Great job!!!! |
This is pretty much all spot on. |
It was so much more acceptable when certain people were safe than other people weren’t. |
What we need is to ignore the loud contingent of SJWs and non-incarceration policy pushing non-profits who yell loudly at council meetings and lobby to foist these lax policies on the city. It’s not fking working. Stop. |
That article is slanted. Bottom line is the bill would have resulted in more crime and less penalties. I like New Yorker. I’m not a fox new idiot. But bottom line is the bill, for example, would have ensured jury trials for all misdemeanors on an already overburden court system. Even if they did hire more staff, it would still be a catalyst for the court to basically ignore quality of life crimes. I get social justice, but really, lowering penalties for crime detracts from social equity. |
republicans? As far as I know Washington DC is solidly Democrat. |
Were you here for the first control board? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Financial_Control_Board It was supported by Eleanor Holmes Norton and helped stabilize the city and set the stage for a comeback, including getting the city needed financial resources from feds. Member of a board would be appointed, it would not be those members of Congress. |