Kevin Federline support ask?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, the kid is turning 18, so he's asking for *more* money?

I'm a fan of Britney and think Kevin is a deadbeat loser, but the kids have good reason not to want to be around her (untreated mental illness). If she wants to be a good mother, she will always be open to them and a relationship and not cut them off as if the relationship were transactional. Unfortunately, I think she's in suspended adolescence and relates to them as if they are peers instead of her being the one who has to offer unconditional love. And, she, herself, did not experience healthy parenting. So they got what they got, which was Kevin. Not a good situation all around.

She’s not in suspended adolescence. She is severely mentally ill and appears to have a low iq.

I imagine it's all of the above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There have been some news reports that Federline may ask for more $$ since he has kids 100 percent of time and the youngest is about to turn 18. i can understand that. But..I found it strange that he suddenly moved to Hawaii due to a job for his wife. Okay but surprised no one reported another fact. In Hawaii child support goes to 23 if kids are in school. Might that be the real reason? I am thinking he has become concerned that the gravy train is about to end. I am sure she already agreed to pay for college so wondering how that would be handled.Feel for Britney seems she cannot get a break.

He already had 70% custody since 2019. I don’t think losing the extra 30% really warrants a sizable CS adjustment. Her income also seems like it is probably lower than the last time he sought an adjustment because no more residency and seemingly no new streams of income. I don’t think he can change CS jurisdiction but maybe he can argue that Hawaii is more expensive thus he needs more CA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been some news reports that Federline may ask for more $$ since he has kids 100 percent of time and the youngest is about to turn 18. i can understand that. But..I found it strange that he suddenly moved to Hawaii due to a job for his wife. Okay but surprised no one reported another fact. In Hawaii child support goes to 23 if kids are in school. Might that be the real reason? I am thinking he has become concerned that the gravy train is about to end. I am sure she already agreed to pay for college so wondering how that would be handled.Feel for Britney seems she cannot get a break.

He already had 70% custody since 2019. I don’t think losing the extra 30% really warrants a sizable CS adjustment. Her income also seems like it is probably lower than the last time he sought an adjustment because no more residency and seemingly no new streams of income. I don’t think he can change CS jurisdiction but maybe he can argue that Hawaii is more expensive thus he needs more CA.

I recently read somewhere (can't remember the source) that he doesn't have a trust set up for his kids, either. So many are questioning why not and what exactly is he doing with the money. That just goes to people not understanding what child support actually is, although I digress. I think this is a crazy ask on his part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Britney have anything left after paying off Sam?

He shouldn’t get a penny.

They don’t have a child together, and he’s an able bodied man.

I hope the court sees through his scam and doesn’t give him anything.

[Anonymous]

There is no actual evidence he is asking for anything. There were tabloids sayin source said...

Kevin is the furthest thing from a deadbeat dad.

And moving to Hawaii doesn't change a California support order

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is no actual evidence he is asking for anything. There were tabloids sayin source said...

Kevin is the furthest thing from a deadbeat dad.

And moving to Hawaii doesn't change a California support order

Does he earn money to support his family or does he rely on Britney to cover expenses?

She’s been giving him upwards of $500k/year for a long time…even though her heyday ended decades ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they live in Hawaii and are residents of Hawaii the rules are different. Maybe he will threaten legal action. I thought the whole Hawaii thing all of a sudden was strange. Those kids have definitely been alienated. It may take her totally cutting them off as young adults for them to understand that she was the provider

k-fed's wife got a job coaching volleyball at her alma mater in hawaii, hence the move, although i'm sure the child support angle was part of that career decision.

I am genuinely fascinated by k-fed's never-ending talent at finding beautiful, talented women to pay for his life and to have kids with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a loser.

How pathetic to go through life without working to support yourself and your family. He’s lived off of his ex and her child support.

And how sad that her children never were able to establish a solid relationship with her.

If those kids don’t have any relationship with her, then she should cut them off once her CS obligations end. Why through money and gifts their way if they make no effort to have a relationship with her as young adults?

And yet when people post about estates and not giving money equally among children or cutting children out, almost everyone says how horrible that is...

It’s usually horrible.

But this is a very unusual situation.

How many families devolve to the point where Deadbeat Dad gets the kids, never works, and essentially alienates affection/turns kids against the mom?

She’s paying a boatload in child support and the kids probably have trusts. But if they literally never call her or take her calls, then why should she continue to throw money their way once they become adults who don’t interact with her?

Having said that, I doubt they will be stupid enough to cut off the gravy train. They might start sucking up to her once they launch…if they launch. It’s not a leap to assume they might not be equipped for adulting given their father is a layabout loser.

First off the kids didn’t choose this mess. She brought them into this disaster and if they are weird because they were raised by KFed, that’s on her too. Second, can you imagine how bad she had to be for KFed to get custody? You have one party who is rich and successful and one party is KFed and the judge said - KFed is the sane choice. Finally can you imagine how traumatizing and frightening it must have been to be her child and exposed to her erratic behavior? Frankly the least she can do is pony up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a loser.

How pathetic to go through life without working to support yourself and your family. He’s lived off of his ex and her child support.

And how sad that her children never were able to establish a solid relationship with her.

If those kids don’t have any relationship with her, then she should cut them off once her CS obligations end. Why through money and gifts their way if they make no effort to have a relationship with her as young adults?

And yet when people post about estates and not giving money equally among children or cutting children out, almost everyone says how horrible that is...

It’s usually horrible.

But this is a very unusual situation.

How many families devolve to the point where Deadbeat Dad gets the kids, never works, and essentially alienates affection/turns kids against the mom?

She’s paying a boatload in child support and the kids probably have trusts. But if they literally never call her or take her calls, then why should she continue to throw money their way once they become adults who don’t interact with her?

Having said that, I doubt they will be stupid enough to cut off the gravy train. They might start sucking up to her once they launch…if they launch. It’s not a leap to assume they might not be equipped for adulting given their father is a layabout loser.

First off the kids didn’t choose this mess. She brought them into this disaster and if they are weird because they were raised by KFed, that’s on her too. Second, can you imagine how bad she had to be for KFed to get custody? You have one party who is rich and successful and one party is KFed and the judge said - KFed is the sane choice. Finally can you imagine how traumatizing and frightening it must have been to be her child and exposed to her erratic behavior? Frankly the least she can do is pony up.

ITA

Also—she literally has no one in her life at all at this point, she might as well give the $ to this kids instead of whatever scam artist comes along next.

I can’t imagine how it’s going to end with her, she really does need to under a conservatorship or even in an in patient program. She’s very very mentally ill and has an extremely low IQ. She’s going to end up dead or broke and homeless screaming at tourists in Tampa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a loser.

How pathetic to go through life without working to support yourself and your family. He’s lived off of his ex and her child support.

And how sad that her children never were able to establish a solid relationship with her.

If those kids don’t have any relationship with her, then she should cut them off once her CS obligations end. Why through money and gifts their way if they make no effort to have a relationship with her as young adults?

And yet when people post about estates and not giving money equally among children or cutting children out, almost everyone says how horrible that is...

It’s usually horrible.

But this is a very unusual situation.

How many families devolve to the point where Deadbeat Dad gets the kids, never works, and essentially alienates affection/turns kids against the mom?

She’s paying a boatload in child support and the kids probably have trusts. But if they literally never call her or take her calls, then why should she continue to throw money their way once they become adults who don’t interact with her?

Having said that, I doubt they will be stupid enough to cut off the gravy train. They might start sucking up to her once they launch…if they launch. It’s not a leap to assume they might not be equipped for adulting given their father is a layabout loser.

First off the kids didn’t choose this mess. She brought them into this disaster and if they are weird because they were raised by KFed, that’s on her too. Second, can you imagine how bad she had to be for KFed to get custody? You have one party who is rich and successful and one party is KFed and the judge said - KFed is the sane choice. Finally can you imagine how traumatizing and frightening it must have been to be her child and exposed to her erratic behavior? Frankly the least she can do is pony up.

Do you think she still needs to pony up for adult children though or is it time to pull them off the titt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they live in Hawaii and are residents of Hawaii the rules are different. Maybe he will threaten legal action. I thought the whole Hawaii thing all of a sudden was strange. Those kids have definitely been alienated. It may take her totally cutting them off as young adults for them to understand that she was the provider

You can’t just change where child support is determined. Even if you move.

[Anonymous]

I know this is an unpopular opinion but I don’t think k fed is a dead beat. Kids turned out ok. Went to a good school. Stayed out of trouble. Same with kfed, he got married and was out of public eye. Yes he has bad taste and not an intellectual but can’t hold that against him.
Can’t blame him that Britney doesn’t have relationship with kids. Who could have a relationship with her? Look at her, she is certifiably nuts.

[Anonymous]

Why do people keep insisting Britney is low IQ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know this is an unpopular opinion but I don’t think k fed is a dead beat. Kids turned out ok. Went to a good school. Stayed out of trouble. Same with kfed, he got married and was out of public eye. Yes he has bad taste and not an intellectual but can’t hold that against him.
Can’t blame him that Britney doesn’t have relationship with kids. Who could have a relationship with her? Look at her, she is certifiably nuts.

Kfed is a deadbeat. He has two children prior to Brittany that he has never provided support for and actually left their mother during her second pregnancy for Brittany. He is now parading his two sons around for tabloid fodder against their mother and helped create hostile attitude towards her. He is on his 3rd set of kids, still with no job and his wife is a volleyball coach living in Hawaii. Without Brittany's money he'd be homeless and unable to support his " family" in anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a loser.

How pathetic to go through life without working to support yourself and your family. He’s lived off of his ex and her child support.

And how sad that her children never were able to establish a solid relationship with her.

If those kids don’t have any relationship with her, then she should cut them off once her CS obligations end. Why through money and gifts their way if they make no effort to have a relationship with her as young adults?

And yet when people post about estates and not giving money equally among children or cutting children out, almost everyone says how horrible that is...

It’s usually horrible.

But this is a very unusual situation.

How many families devolve to the point where Deadbeat Dad gets the kids, never works, and essentially alienates affection/turns kids against the mom?

She’s paying a boatload in child support and the kids probably have trusts. But if they literally never call her or take her calls, then why should she continue to throw money their way once they become adults who don’t interact with her?

Having said that, I doubt they will be stupid enough to cut off the gravy train. They might start sucking up to her once they launch…if they launch. It’s not a leap to assume they might not be equipped for adulting given their father is a layabout loser.

First off the kids didn’t choose this mess. She brought them into this disaster and if they are weird because they were raised by KFed, that’s on her too. Second, can you imagine how bad she had to be for KFed to get custody? You have one party who is rich and successful and one party is KFed and the judge said - KFed is the sane choice. Finally can you imagine how traumatizing and frightening it must have been to be her child and exposed to her erratic behavior? Frankly the least she can do is pony up.

Do you think she still needs to pony up for adult children though or is it time to pull them off the titt?

As I said, she and KFed ruined them. Send them to college and pay for their living expenses is the least a parent can do.