Daily calories

[Anonymous]

All the shorties here:

Reddit has a great subreddit for fitness and petite folks. Might be helpful in fitness journeys.


https://www.reddit.com/r/PetiteFitness/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you know, what is your daily calorie range to maintain weight?

I am 46yo 5’7 at 175lb and I was told to eat 1600 to loose weight but it’s been 2 weeks and I lost nothing. Not sedentary but not actively exercising either. Walking around the house, doing errands etc

Curious if it’s just my slow metabolism or is it normal.

Train your muscles. Higher muscle mass=faster metabolism. If you don't have time to do that, you probably just need to eat even less.

[Anonymous]

I think this advice is ridiculous. If you want to “quickly” lose weight and then gain it right back, sure eat your 1200-1300 calories a day.

But if you want real, sustainer lifestyle changes, you are going to have to eat a lot more than that - the right things - and train a lot more to get your muscle up.

[Anonymous]

I had the analysis done at my doctor’s office: resting metabolism 1500, with daily activity 2700. I was shocked my resting was so low. I am 5’8” and 190 lbs (recently lost 25 and have 25 to go).

I’m actually surprised your daily activity is so high. My bmr was measured twice at 987 and 936 and I estimate my daily at 1500 with moderate activity. My bmr is about 200 calories under the formula 655 + (9.6 X kg) + (1.8 * cm) -(4.7 * age). Estimation of moderate activity only adds about 500 cal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this advice is ridiculous. If you want to “quickly” lose weight and then gain it right back, sure eat your 1200-1300 calories a day.

But if you want real, sustainer lifestyle changes, you are going to have to eat a lot more than that - the right things - and train a lot more to get your muscle up.

For petite ppl, ignore the above, as I mentioned, at 5 feet tall and 115, I’m at 1200 a day IF I don’t work out. I am also very fit as a runner and am toned and have well developed muscles as someone who regularly lifts weight. Again, since I do workout almost every day, I’m eating more than 1200 a day.

But the point is, if you want to eat more than ur base calorie needs, you have to workout. Otherwise, you’re going to have to eat within ur base calorie needs to lose or maintain weight.

Otherwise, if you’re not petite, 1200-1300 is likely not very much.

[Anonymous]

1200-1300 maintenance is either the result of completely ranking your body with restrictive eating over time or all you do is lay around all day, not moving. My base is 1250, but this is the bare minimum to exist. Even going to the bathroom and typing will move you up to 1400 at least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this advice is ridiculous. If you want to “quickly” lose weight and then gain it right back, sure eat your 1200-1300 calories a day.

But if you want real, sustainer lifestyle changes, you are going to have to eat a lot more than that - the right things - and train a lot more to get your muscle up.

For petite ppl, ignore the above, as I mentioned, at 5 feet tall and 115, I’m at 1200 a day IF I don’t work out. I am also very fit as a runner and am toned and have well developed muscles as someone who regularly lifts weight. Again, since I do workout almost every day, I’m eating more than 1200 a day.

But the point is, if you want to eat more than ur base calorie needs, you have to workout. Otherwise, you’re going to have to eat within ur base calorie needs to lose or maintain weight.

Otherwise, if you’re not petite, 1200-1300 is likely not very much.

OP should absolutely not go down to 1220 calories a day to lose weight. No one wants to live like that. She will lose it quickly and then make maintenance impossible. Stick with 1600, move as much as you can, and give it time. Two weeks really isn't enough.

[Anonymous]

Bmr calculator puts you at 1460 which is about daily burn ofn1700 for sedentary (which if you’re not exercising you probably should use). If you’re eating 1600 you could easily be eating 1700/1800 even when you’re measuring as it’s hard to be exact.

Add in 30-60 minutes of exercise daily at 1600 and you will start to lose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you know, what is your daily calorie range to maintain weight?

I am 46yo 5’7 at 175lb and I was told to eat 1600 to loose weight but it’s been 2 weeks and I lost nothing. Not sedentary but not actively exercising either. Walking around the house, doing errands etc

Curious if it’s just my slow metabolism or is it normal.

Calories are rather pointless as a measure of energy. Calories are measured in a bomb calorimeter. The item being tested is put in an oxygen-filled chamber that is placed in water weighing 1 kg. The item is burned. The temperature of the water is measured. For every degree Celsius the water rose, we say the item had 1 Calorie. Is that really how you think your body uses the energy from food? Absolutely not! Your body gets energy from a complex set of chemical processes. Not all Calories are the same. You could burn wood and raise the temperature of water. Go ahead and eat that wood, though, and you'll find your body cannot digest and process it. Protein is supposed to have 4 Calories per gram, the same as a carbohydrate. However, protein cannot be used by the body efficiently as a source of energy, and heat creation in the process means something like 30% of that potential energy is lost.

Then some people are highly inefficient at breaking down and processing carbohydrates. Hormones in their bodies promote the storage of glucose into fat cells and prevent their use as energy. Such a person will gain fat from eating a donut or bread and have no ability to use that energy. To make things even more interesting, food labels are allowed to be off by as much as 20%, so you really have no idea how many "Calories" you take in, even if Calories meant anything. Finally, the other half of any weight loss/gain equation is how much energy you use. Oh, that is a feedback look and partially depends on how much you eat and what you eat! In other words, you may use less energy as a result of eating less food! So you can't know how much energy you "burn."

Therefore, Calories are pretty much pointless as an energy source for your body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you know, what is your daily calorie range to maintain weight?

I am 46yo 5’7 at 175lb and I was told to eat 1600 to loose weight but it’s been 2 weeks and I lost nothing. Not sedentary but not actively exercising either. Walking around the house, doing errands etc

Curious if it’s just my slow metabolism or is it normal.

Calories are rather pointless as a measure of energy. Calories are measured in a bomb calorimeter. The item being tested is put in an oxygen-filled chamber that is placed in water weighing 1 kg. The item is burned. The temperature of the water is measured. For every degree Celsius the water rose, we say the item had 1 Calorie. Is that really how you think your body uses the energy from food? Absolutely not! Your body gets energy from a complex set of chemical processes. Not all Calories are the same. You could burn wood and raise the temperature of water. Go ahead and eat that wood, though, and you'll find your body cannot digest and process it. Protein is supposed to have 4 Calories per gram, the same as a carbohydrate. However, protein cannot be used by the body efficiently as a source of energy, and heat creation in the process means something like 30% of that potential energy is lost.

Then some people are highly inefficient at breaking down and processing carbohydrates. Hormones in their bodies promote the storage of glucose into fat cells and prevent their use as energy. Such a person will gain fat from eating a donut or bread and have no ability to use that energy. To make things even more interesting, food labels are allowed to be off by as much as 20%, so you really have no idea how many "Calories" you take in, even if Calories meant anything. Finally, the other half of any weight loss/gain equation is how much energy you use. Oh, that is a feedback loop and partially depends on how much you eat and what you eat! In other words, you may use less energy as a result of eating less food! So you can't know how much energy you "burn."

Therefore, Calories are pretty much pointless as an energy source for your body.

fixed "look" to "loop"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m 5 feet tall and 115 and maintain that on 1200 calories a day, assuming at least 5000 steps a day, usually more. However I do exercise almost everyday so I usually eat more than that - 1500 to 2000 depending on what my workout is that day.

Same, except l am 111.
I am small energy efficient car that requires little fuel. I usually skip a meal a say, that is the equivalent of a meal for other less energy efficient people 😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you know, what is your daily calorie range to maintain weight?

I am 46yo 5’7 at 175lb and I was told to eat 1600 to loose weight but it’s been 2 weeks and I lost nothing. Not sedentary but not actively exercising either. Walking around the house, doing errands etc

Curious if it’s just my slow metabolism or is it normal.

Calories are rather pointless as a measure of energy. Calories are measured in a bomb calorimeter. The item being tested is put in an oxygen-filled chamber that is placed in water weighing 1 kg. The item is burned. The temperature of the water is measured. For every degree Celsius the water rose, we say the item had 1 Calorie. Is that really how you think your body uses the energy from food? Absolutely not! Your body gets energy from a complex set of chemical processes. Not all Calories are the same. You could burn wood and raise the temperature of water. Go ahead and eat that wood, though, and you'll find your body cannot digest and process it. Protein is supposed to have 4 Calories per gram, the same as a carbohydrate. However, protein cannot be used by the body efficiently as a source of energy, and heat creation in the process means something like 30% of that potential energy is lost.

Then some people are highly inefficient at breaking down and processing carbohydrates. Hormones in their bodies promote the storage of glucose into fat cells and prevent their use as energy. Such a person will gain fat from eating a donut or bread and have no ability to use that energy. To make things even more interesting, food labels are allowed to be off by as much as 20%, so you really have no idea how many "Calories" you take in, even if Calories meant anything. Finally, the other half of any weight loss/gain equation is how much energy you use. Oh, that is a feedback look and partially depends on how much you eat and what you eat! In other words, you may use less energy as a result of eating less food! So you can't know how much energy you "burn."

Therefore, Calories are pretty much pointless as an energy source for your body.

Agree. You can’t think of calories in/out as a math questions. There are just too many variables. It is impossible to accurately calculate both what you are burning and how many calories you are eating. You just have to weight yourself regularly and adjust what/how much you eat and move depending on what direction you want your weight to go.