| Ridiculous and selfish. No one needs to father a child at 82, when statistically you will die while the child is still elementary school age. |
| Noor studied film in college. For her undergraduate, she studied at the University of Southern California’s School of Cinematic Arts, and she later got her master’s degree in Film and TV producing |
| masters from UCLA |
The child will be fine. Everyone should just be happy for them. |
alpha? How about pathetic (and selfish). |
Right, knowingly inflicting that future on your child. |
| I thought this was a duplicate topic but then realized the other one was di nero. Odd choices for sure, but at least they’ll be set financially. |
I’m not disparaging them, but I can’t work up any happiness either. I hope the child is healthy and has a happy life. |
She could have kept her legs shut too. As if it is all on Pacino. Digging for gold has a small price. Oh that poor child, what will they ever do inheriting millions of dollars? |
You sounds as mixed up as the parents in this case. You can't put a price on losing a parent in childhood. That trauma shapes people. How sick that you think EVERYTHING can be reduced to dollar signs. |
|
Very gross.
And I feel bad for the kid being used as a piggy bank for mom. |
|
Children born from old fathers have higher risk of developing schizophrenia.
"It demonstrated a linear increase in the risk of schizophrenia with increasing paternal age after adjusting for mother's age. Each decade of the father's age multiplied the risk of schizophrenia by 1.4 (1.2-1.7, p<.0001), so that the RR for offspring of fathers aged 45+ was tripled compared with those of fathers aged 20-24." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457665/#:~:text=It%20demonstrated%20a%20linear%20increase,1.2%2D1.7%2C%20p%3C. |
| Who cares? Live and let live. |
| Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. |
| Came here for the typical DCUM misandry and ageism. Was not disappointed. |