Al Pacino to be a father at 82

[Anonymous]

I'm generally tolerant of May-December couples, but for her to be linked to Mick Jagger when he was 74 and she was 22 is just....gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So apparently he requested a prenatal paternity test, she didn’t tell him she was pregnant until 11 weeks and got pregnant within the first few months they were dating. They’re also not together anymore. I wonder if she is actually as wealthy as people say because the whole situation is weird. To have a baby with someone who does not seem excited at all and who is super old. Even having a child with someone after less than a year of dating is weird. That said at his old age Al should understand where babies come from.

If he absolutely didn’t want more kids he should’ve used a condom or gotten snipped.

I completely agree. I do wonder if he thought he couldn’t have kids since his kids with Beverly D’Angelo were conceived via ivf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how on so many forums here so many people seem to think that parents aren’t important. All these “they have money” and “As long as someone loves them they’ll be fine stuff” is really sad and not at all in line with how children and humans actually experience the world.

We get it, you think single parents are inferior.

Its just not optimal. Generally parents try to create optimal circumstances for their children. Parents matter to children. They aren't puppies.

One rich parent who loves their child & specifically wanted to have one is better than two poor parents who had an oops baby.

man your standards for life are low, like seriously low. Only poor people think being rich makes things all better. You have no idea whether this woman is a loving mother, you're just like, oh they can easily do travel soccer and pay for college. Parenting is about a lot more than that. A LOT. THere are a lot of poor people who as parents put the rich to shame.

[Anonymous]

Someone accused this forum of “ageism”

Maybe accuse us of “deathism” where we disparage fathers who are dead because they had babies when they were in their 80s. That’s the biggest issue here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone accused this forum of “ageism”

Maybe accuse us of “deathism” where we disparage fathers who are dead because they had babies when they were in their 80s. That’s the biggest issue here

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how on so many forums here so many people seem to think that parents aren’t important. All these “they have money” and “As long as someone loves them they’ll be fine stuff” is really sad and not at all in line with how children and humans actually experience the world.

We get it, you think single parents are inferior.

Its just not optimal. Generally parents try to create optimal circumstances for their children. Parents matter to children. They aren't puppies.

One rich parent who loves their child & specifically wanted to have one is better than two poor parents who had an oops baby.

man your standards for life are low, like seriously low. Only poor people think being rich makes things all better. You have no idea whether this woman is a loving mother, you're just like, oh they can easily do travel soccer and pay for college. Parenting is about a lot more than that. A LOT. THere are a lot of poor people who as parents put the rich to shame.

x100000

Well said! It is amazing how narrow DCUMland's views on money can be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm generally tolerant of May-December couples, but for her to be linked to Mick Jagger when he was 74 and she was 22 is just....gross.

+1

If the dude is older than your parents, you need to reassess. Seriously reassess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many actors just like him had babies later in life

Tony Randal
Richard Gere
David Foster
Mick Jagger
Billy Joel
Rod Stewart
Rupert Murdoch

Many of them broke? Just wondering.

[Anonymous]

Poor child. There is no way this woman is mentally healthy or capable of putting her child’s needs first. I lost my father in elementary. It was hard enough without knowing that it was an experience my parents essentially chose for me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how on so many forums here so many people seem to think that parents aren’t important. All these “they have money” and “As long as someone loves them they’ll be fine stuff” is really sad and not at all in line with how children and humans actually experience the world.

We get it, you think single parents are inferior.

Its just not optimal. Generally parents try to create optimal circumstances for their children. Parents matter to children. They aren't puppies.

One rich parent who loves their child & specifically wanted to have one is better than two poor parents who had an oops baby.

Plenty of parents also love their oops baby.

And is this one rich parent who loves their child? Or some girl with some sort of weird geriatric fetish and an old fool that didn’t want any more kids?

[Anonymous]

Poor Al has been dumped just three months after the oops baby arrived.

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/9026508/al-pacino-ex-files-for-custody-baby/amp/

Bonus - she gets his cash and doesn’t have to deal with his increasing infirmity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor Al has been dumped just three months after the oops baby arrived.

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/9026508/al-pacino-ex-files-for-custody-baby/amp/

Bonus - she gets his cash and doesn’t have to deal with his increasing infirmity.

The downside of being an alpha male. You don't know your limits.

[Anonymous]

These foolish old men are disgusting.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how on so many forums here so many people seem to think that parents aren’t important. All these “they have money” and “As long as someone loves them they’ll be fine stuff” is really sad and not at all in line with how children and humans actually experience the world.

We get it, you think single parents are inferior.

Its just not optimal. Generally parents try to create optimal circumstances for their children. Parents matter to children. They aren't puppies.

One rich parent who loves their child & specifically wanted to have one is better than two poor parents who had an oops baby.

man your standards for life are low, like seriously low. Only poor people think being rich makes things all better. You have no idea whether this woman is a loving mother, you're just like, oh they can easily do travel soccer and pay for college. Parenting is about a lot more than that. A LOT. THere are a lot of poor people who as parents put the rich to shame.

x100000

Well said! It is amazing how narrow DCUMland's views on money can be.

+1