| This is a stupid headline. “Paycheck to paycheck” doesn’t mean anything. The write up is lazy and doesn’t say how it is defined in the survey, which wasn’t done by a research organization - it was done by a personal finance website to generate traffic. |
Save your useless lecture. Did you see where the article says 66% of Gen X and over 50% of Boomers are also living paycheck to paycheck? So people decades older than the Millennials haven’t figured it out either. It’s a structural problem, not unique to this generation and not a deficiency of character. |
|
Living paycheck to paycheck is what nearly all of humanity does. It's NORMAL. Why does this surprise anyone? |
|
My millennials make 100K and 175K.
I guess they are the exception to the rule. |
I am a white person who grew up in a LCOL in the northeast, and I know plenty of other people outside this demographic who didn't think passion jobs were for rich people (non-white, from urban areas, etc). That's because our families were poor or middle class and a teacher or nonprofit worker's salary was often as good or better than what our parents made. People on this site are obsessed with saying "only for trust funders" but 99% of Americans are NOT trust funders, even in those jobs. There just aren't THAT many rich people in this country. The PP who said teaching is for trust funders or rich spouses...I mean that's just objectively, empirically wrong, where do you live? That said, I think these articles use "paycheck to paycheck" pretty sloppily, so I take it with a huge grain of salt. |
| My 24 yo with a 3.4 gpa at college works in a MCOL area in a good job that only required A college BA/BS (nothing specific they train you) and they are making $60K first year and $64K 2nd year. My kid is a good kid and somewhat motivated, but was fine with B's in college mentality yet still is making more than that average. They are managing independently just fine without any roommates. |
Huh? |
| My Gen Z DD (age 23) makes $85k. Went to a university I rarely see mentioned on DCUM. |
Lol neither of those groups want to teach, it's a real job that is hard and requires skill. Teaching is a job for middle class people who (1) actually want to teach, and (2) appreciate the job security and benefits, including a pension and guaranteed holidays off, etc. Jobs for trust funders and people with rich spouses: novelist, yoga teacher, dog walker, dancer/actor/performer. Jobs where the odds of making no (or even negative amounts, when training and overhead are taken into account) are a real possibility. But also "flexible" jobs where if you want to go live in Bali for a month just because, you don't have to ask anyone for permission. No trust funder is going to sign up for a job where taking a day off when you are scheduled to work involves writing a detailed plan for a sub and then worrying the whole time that they couldn't find a sub at all. |
| I don't know any teachers who meet this description. If they have a rich spouse, they don't need to work. Teaching isn't just so easy hobby job. I think it's very normal to live paycheck to paycheck. |
Lol, I make more than both of them and am also a millennial. However, I'm 41 so that means nothing as it relates to the younger millennials. |
Wow, how did you know my background? I’m GenX, white LMC from very rural LCOL in South, and I totally followed my passion to my peril — and by the time I tried to pivot to make real money, I’ve made zero headway despite hundreds of job applications and job training certificates over a decade Why do you point out that combo so distinctly? |
Maybe in Potomac. Most teachers have blue collar roots and see it as a decent paying job with state gov benefits. Usually the benefits support a spouse working a private sector job or running a small business. Passion jobs for trust funders are all the non-profits in NYC/DC or anything you do with a degree in Fine Arts. |
They are in their upper 20s. |