Inappropriate to show fat legs?

[Anonymous]

I am more grossed out by fat arms than fat legs, also bat arms and bat legs.

[Anonymous]

Absolutely inappropriate!
Please switch out your legs for thinner ones before you head out so you don't become a fashion victim.
Unless it's after Labor Day.

[Anonymous]

Depends on context, but I don’t think there’s anything inappropriate about shorts of a decent length in any context where shorts are allowed. You may feel more comfortable and attractive covering up, but that’s not the same question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's inappropriate is the idea that people should cover up so as not to offend other people.

+1 this post is so annoying
If you take out the word fat, how ludicrous does the sentence sound:
Re:Inappropriate to show legs?

Fat legs, skinny legs all ok!!

[Anonymous]

PEOPLE, IT IS 41 DEGREES OUTSIDE. YOU ARE NOT A 13 YEAR-OLD BOY. SHORTS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE RIGHT NOW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PEOPLE, IT IS 41 DEGREES OUTSIDE. YOU ARE NOT A 13 YEAR-OLD BOY. SHORTS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE RIGHT NOW.

Yes, it'll be 41 outside forever. You're right. We should not plan for summer and just caught unawares when it arrives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It depends on what you consider showing your legs. It’s never inappropriate to show knees down. An obese person in booty shorts or even 4” shorts can be inappropriate unless you’re at the beach.

Depends on the calves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am more grossed out by fat arms than fat legs, also bat arms and bat legs.

They are both gross. Cover them up.

- fat person who covers them up

[Anonymous]

Cankles?

[Anonymous]

As long as you’re dressed appropriately for the occasion, wear what you want. Booty shorts at church, probably a no-go no matter your size. Booty shorts at Kings Dominion, sure, who cares. Now I mean, if you’re not comfortable in booty shorts that’s ok too. But that’s a “you” thing. It’s not an “everyone else” thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men love thick legs. Pass the hot sauce, yum, yum.

That’s chicken legs you are talking about. Op is talking about different legs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PEOPLE, IT IS 41 DEGREES OUTSIDE. YOU ARE NOT A 13 YEAR-OLD BOY. SHORTS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE RIGHT NOW.

Fair point. (Unless OP is a 13-year-old boy.) In my opinion, is inappropriate to show fat legs in the same situation it is inappropriate to show skinny legs. Like 41 degree weather, for example. Wait until summer for the shorts and mini skirts, people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am more grossed out by fat arms than fat legs, also bat arms and bat legs.

I love loose skin arms, they remind me of when I was little and my grandmother and the older ladies would hold you and their arms were so comforting. I could lay on that soft flappy type skin for hours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's inappropriate is the idea that people should cover up so as not to offend other people.

+1 this post is so annoying
If you take out the word fat, how ludicrous does the sentence sound:
Re:Inappropriate to show legs?

Fat legs, skinny legs all ok!!

Sorry, but fat legs are not ok. It is nauseating to watch someone's fat.

[Anonymous]

As long as your hoo ha isn’t showing.