Is it true that there will be fewer applicants beginning in 2025 ? Based on birth rate stats |
"There is a potential 10-15% drop in “traditional” incoming college students projected to occur starting in 2025. It is being called the Enrollment Cliff or the Demographic Cliff, but no matter what you call it, higher education will be affected. The 2008 economic recession caused a decline in U.S. birth rates as people either put off starting a family or had fewer kids."
More here: https://www.mongooseresearch.com/blog/preparing-for-the-2025-enrollment-cliff-mongoose |
There is research to explain what has happened: Most of the research is behind paywalls. However, here is a North Carolina report (https://studylib.net/doc/10700128/table-of-contents) and an Education Week article (https://www.edweek.org/education/s-a-t-to-realign-...time-in-half-a-century/1994/06) that explain what happened. The 1995 recentering shifted the average score 80 points on the verbal section and 50 on the math, i.e. students who took the SAT prior to 1995 would score at least 130 points higher if they took it after the recentering. The 2005 changes eliminated content in the test that was considered biased and correlated with IQ tests. Excerpt:
|
DS took the test once. Scored in the 1400's. No paid prepping. UWGPA of 3.9+. Attending an honors program at a university that the typical DCUM'ers would consider a safety for sure. |
Peak birth year was 2007. That would be this year’s sophomores and freshman. Absolute numbers of American kids decline after that. But, I’m not sure if there will actually be fewer rich and high-achieving kids. Perhaps those folks continued to pump out kids through the 2010s. It also depends on whether insanely high-achieving and wealthy international students continue to apply. |
Close to 200,000 kids each year score 1400+ or the equivalent on the ACT. So a 1400 doesn’t mean much anymore. And then you have all the kids applying test. |
They should recenter the sat to bring the scores down again so a 1500 or 1600 is more meaningful. There’s too much compression at the top. Grades are so random, even within a school. My kid has a math teacher where only one kid in class got an A but the other teacher for same class gave mostly As. |
This. Seriously, search back. People say this EVERY year (even pre-COVID). It is all about your list. Applying to a broad range of ELITE schools is not making a balanced list. 98% of the kids who are shut out are to blame (though maybe their parents played a heavy role in the debacle). |
And yet, I predict that in 2025, someone will post something very similar to OP on DCUM. |
Safety schools are ones who take the majority of applicants. Otherwise it’s hit or miss as lots of applicants, many who are very similar on the application and limited slots. |
A high SAT means nothing. All those kids who used to relay on the SAT scores took those darn test a bunch of times until they achieved the parents desire score. The only ones hurting from this are Tutors and companies who "help" you study for the SATs. ![]() |
It is true. Parents always come up with some reason they want to believe. This cycle, it's because TO. A couple years back, it was because Covid, a few years before that, more kids applying, then before that it was Common App...etc. Believe what you want to believe, but it's always the same. |
The scores may be higher now than in the 1990s, but only 7% of SAT test takers today get a 1400 or above. And only 2% get 1500 or above. https://blog.prepscholar.com/sat-percentiles-and-score-rankings |
Who said they were qualified? |
haha... lol. |