Both are 6x week but I just noticed that ASA is a non-profit. I wonder if that’s the difference |
All clubs are hit or miss with coaches these days - that is not specific to NCAP. |
What's the theory behind "these days" here? Some possibilities I just conjured up: 1. More "good" coaches are leaving the area? 2. Good coaches are finding better opportunities outside of club swimming? 3. As local club swimming continues to grow, in large part by adding more mediocre swimmers, clubs naturally add more mediocre coaches to meet the demand signal (and grow their revenue base)? 4. Something else? |
My kid swims for PAC at Fairland. We are in moco but on the eastern side so it’s only 10 mins for us. I looked at Machine because our summer pool uses a Machine coach. It was 3x the price!! My kid is only 10 and likes other sports too, probably not going to swim in college or the Olympics so I’m good with where we are. |
Right, but the point is NCap charges so much more the coaches should not be hit or miss! I’d be curious about any ASA or RMSC families on here and how they feel about their coaching |
I’ve only heard great things about the national level coach at ASA. |
Ncap is the same price as most swim clubs in northern VA - not sure why they’d be more expensive in MD. |
I’m very curious about this. One of my kids is pretty talented and we are with a team that is not mentioned here. I am constantly worried that I’m doing this kid a disservice by not going with a bigger, more expensive club.
One thing I wonder is whether the training group itself - the actual kids - is worth the cost. In other words, is everyone fart and pushing each other? |
My DD is an A/AA swimmer now and last year was her first year participating in club swim. Her rapid improvement was due not only to the coaching she has gotten at NCAP but the training group as well. She swims with kids her age, she’s not outside of her age group, but the lane of kids she swims with are also fast. That has helped motivate her, and her training within the training group is more rigorous than the other lanes with different intervals, different sets, etc. I think it’s probably a little more difficult to get the best out of a kid if they are clearly the best swimmer in their group and there is no one to push them and they are training under their capabilities because the other kids can’t keep up. |
RMSC doesn't pay for pool time so that makes a huge difference but a few years ago they raised prices significantly and justified it with what the other teams were charging despite them not having the same overhead as other groups. In RMSC we have 6-10 kids per lane and it's very hit or miss on the coaches. Years past we had a horrible coach and we finally have good ones. The coach was so bad my kids didn't want to swim but stuck it out knowing eventually they'd move up. Its a money grab too. |
Go with where she is doing well and meshes with the coach/good coach. That is far more important than bigger. Bigger isn't better as kids get less attention. We have two coaches for 50-60 kids per practice. |
RMSC also includes meet fees. I have a hard time believing NCAP doesn’t require parent volunteers, that’s how meets run. Maybe it’s just semantics, we don’t have a quota/point system or anything at RMSC either, but volunteering is expected (sure there are families who do nothing and others who cover). |
Like what? We’re RMSC NTG and ASA is typically at same meets (NCSA, Winter juniors). They do typically also do a slightly slower championship meet (NASA/ISCA I think and I’ve seen Zones), but bring more kids. |
Sorry, bold messed up. This was in reference to ASA @ high profile meets. |
Yes, I think it’s interesting OP pointed out recruitment for MACH. We don’t know a lot of MACH kids bc of location, I don’t think it’s as strong as the bigger clubs. RMSC has been really solid and of course NCAP has kids going to big name programs and great schools. |