best builder in vienna va

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here you go. 318 owaissa rd se Vienna va. Top quality built at $340/per. Still crazy overpriced imo but that’s what I mean

That style of home is such a pox on the town. Wait till you see two or three next to each other all crowded (eg, park st se north of moore)

[Anonymous]

evergreen is crap, how dare someone post that. haha

[Anonymous]

Staats Homes, Cloud 9, Sommerville and a new favorite of mine EV Custom Homes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here you go. 318 owaissa rd se Vienna va. Top quality built at $340/per. Still crazy overpriced imo but that’s what I mean

That style of home is such a pox on the town. Wait till you see two or three next to each other all crowded (eg, park st se north of moore)

At least it’s .5 acres. We have a ridiculous 3 car garage 6/7000 sq ft home being built on .3 acres and it’s an eyesore. It makes you actually miss an hoa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here you go. 318 owaissa rd se Vienna va. Top quality built at $340/per. Still crazy overpriced imo but that’s what I mean

That style of home is such a pox on the town. Wait till you see two or three next to each other all crowded (eg, park st se north of moore)

Agree - that ultra cheap white exterior style with the vertical slats is so bad. it has become the go-to to low-value spec homes. makes me cringe every time i see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:evergreen is crap, how dare someone post that. haha

It was a joke…to anyone seriously comparing built quality, it’s obvious Evergreen sits at bottom of the bucket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Staats Homes, Cloud 9, Sommerville and a new favorite of mine EV Custom Homes.

None of these builders stands out and most of their homes are hideous.

[Anonymous]

I see a lot of posts here saying new homes are all cheap but fail to point out what is not cheap. The new reality is that these homes use different materials than your old schools homes and are way more efficient. So do you people expect these homes to last 75 years vs 100? What’s the point??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of posts here saying new homes are all cheap but fail to point out what is not cheap. The new reality is that these homes use different materials than your old schools homes and are way more efficient. So do you people expect these homes to last 75 years vs 100? What’s the point??

I think many of these new homes are expensive but look cheap in a gaudy way. They are oversized and take away beautiful grass and landscaping. What modern family needs 8 bedrooms? Architecturally, many of them lack interest and integrity and because they are so large they really stand out as eyesores.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of posts here saying new homes are all cheap but fail to point out what is not cheap. The new reality is that these homes use different materials than your old schools homes and are way more efficient. So do you people expect these homes to last 75 years vs 100? What’s the point??

I think many of these new homes are expensive but look cheap in a gaudy way. They are oversized and take away beautiful grass and landscaping. What modern family needs 8 bedrooms? Architecturally, many of them lack interest and integrity and because they are so large they really stand out as eyesores.

Okay I understand now, they looks cheap in a guady way but not necc cheap in the materials etc etc because for sure the material is the new standard in home building like it or not and so efficient. The newer homes are so efficient and air tight, they need a separate fan to circulate outside air into the house. Could it be a lot of us are not used to this style just like older generations were scratching their heads at the two story single families?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of posts here saying new homes are all cheap but fail to point out what is not cheap. The new reality is that these homes use different materials than your old schools homes and are way more efficient. So do you people expect these homes to last 75 years vs 100? What’s the point??

I think many of these new homes are expensive but look cheap in a gaudy way. They are oversized and take away beautiful grass and landscaping. What modern family needs 8 bedrooms? Architecturally, many of them lack interest and integrity and because they are so large they really stand out as eyesores.

Okay I understand now, they looks cheap in a guady way but not necc cheap in the materials etc etc because for sure the material is the new standard in home building like it or not and so efficient. The newer homes are so efficient and air tight, they need a separate fan to circulate outside air into the house. Could it be a lot of us are not used to this style just like older generations were scratching their heads at the two story single families?

Whut? Your post makes no sense.

[Anonymous]

Sekas nice but expensive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sekas nice but expensive

Cheap AND expensive = Sekas. You are easily impressed

[Anonymous]

Most people that post on here can’t even afford new construction and call everything cheap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:$600 ? Wow what are you building?? The top end homes in the area are around $400 MAX.

Are you familiar with the Netflix show The Watcher ?

That is the level of the house I am describing.

And that’s just construction costs - add another 12-15 points for the Architect plus land and other soft costs.