Sorry I’m new to this — which one do I contact? Just the one for my ward or also the at-large members and Chairman? |
YES. The fact that we're having this conversation is stone-cold stupid when schools should have been the last thing to close. It makes absolutely no sense that I can go to Orange Theory in person, sit at a bar, and stand among the sweaty masses at Starbucks but my kid can't go to school. Obviously we should be looking for as many workable solutions as possible, but having the most correct decision off the table entirely is peak idiocy. |
Your ward + the at-large members + Chairman. Also there was a list rumbling around on the board with the emails of the staff for each individual member, who are often more responsive. |
I'm the first poster you quoted. I agree, but if elected officials aren't doing their job with closures, then something else needs to give to keep hospitals functioning. The priority is not kids in school, even though it would be so great if it was. The priority at this point is getting standards of care in hospitals to some degree of decent. I fully concur that this is unfair on the kids and parents. But we need healthcare more than anything else. And if you want to go scream at the Mayor, Governors and others for not shutting down bars and restaurants and other businesses when the time was right, then be my guest - they entirely deserve it! They're all think they can weasel out of difficult choices and no one will see through their little plans. Infuriating. |
|
It makes no sense that closing schools would ease the burden on hospital admissions.
The staff and teachers are vaccinated. Since vaccination became available only like 2.8% of hospitalizations in DC have been vaccinated individuals. Kids are already at a low risk for hospitalizations. Closing schools has not been shown to reduce spread anyway. Closing schools, if anything, will INCREASE the burden on hospitals as hospital staff can't report because they have to stay home with their kids. |
But how else would these councilmembers pretend to do anything? |
PP here, thanks! I’ve sent the emails and copied randomly selected staff members… |
If we want to keep hospitals functioning, we should stop testing/isolating/quarantining asymptotic staff. If sick, stay home, otherwise work as usual. The CDC changes were a good first step but we need to go further. |
| I wish the bill started with the premise that they were trying to keep schools open, rather than looking for a threshold to close them. I support transparency and quicker notifications, but I don’t trust that the council members (especially the ones sponsoring the bill) have in-person schooling sufficiently prioritized. |
| This is a pretty disingenuous description of the bill, OP. But you already knew that. |
NP. The fundamental problem with your argument is that there is no data to suggest that closing schools helps the hospital situation in any way. NONE. School closures have never shown to make a positive difference in hospital admission numbers. The second problem is that next to hospitals and grocery stores, nothing in our society is more essential than schools. So we shouldn't even be talking about closing schools at all. We can talk about closing other things, but not the venues where the people who are least at risk from Covid and most vulnerable in so many other ways get their education, which will affect their future and long-term life expectancy. It is pure lunacy and unethical. |
So just because elected officials won't implement the closures that *might* help with the hospital problem, you want to close schools as a sort of ritualistic sacrifice to feel like you are doing *something* to help, even if there is no evidence that it has the intended effect. |
Yes, let's not borrow problems. |
|
They could close everything but schools. ...
Also why close schools but not daycare? Or day off camps? And why close public but not private schools? If it's public health then all should be examined. |
Even if I did agree with you, you're talking about hospital utilization rates, not case rates, which is what this bill is about. |