ECNL moving to school year not calendar

[Anonymous]

I would be ok with an exceptions for kids in districts that the cut off date is 8/1 or 7/15 and started kids on time but i would not be ok with an exception made for an august birthday with a 10/1 cut off just because you decided to start your kid a year late.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the last 76 pages have been SY+ guy pushing his agenda and replying to his own posts. Nevertheless, it has put us close to our goal of 1000.

Can't wait for posts from the SY+ Leo& Virgo parent.

I'm not replying to my own posts.

I do think SY+60 is the way to go. There must be others that see its logic as well.

I appreciate all the crazy spam posts fighting against SY+60. The more you go insane the more parents are introduced the the SY+60 concept.

9/1 to 8/1 with August birthdays playing up or down to align with their school grade has always been a superior argument to SY+60.

And isn’t one state’s school year based on birth year (Connecticut maybe)? In which case, SY+60 fails to help kids from that state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would be ok with an exceptions for kids in districts that the cut off date is 8/1 or 7/15 and started kids on time but i would not be ok with an exception made for an august birthday with a 10/1 cut off just because you decided to start your kid a year late.

So it’s the perceived intent for people who choose not to send their kids to school based on an arbitrary date is what gets you? Do you know how school cutoffs work? They don’t say your kid MUST attend school by a certain age. They say you MUST be a certain age before you start.

[Anonymous]

Here’s the info on school cut off dates for kids (by state). I know it’s been posted to this chat before.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/age-to-start-kindergarten-by-state

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be ok with an exceptions for kids in districts that the cut off date is 8/1 or 7/15 and started kids on time but i would not be ok with an exception made for an august birthday with a 10/1 cut off just because you decided to start your kid a year late.

So it’s the perceived intent for people who choose not to send their kids to school based on an arbitrary date is what gets you? Do you know how school cutoffs work? They don’t say your kid MUST attend school by a certain age. They say you MUST be a certain age before you start.

They actually do say that your kid must attend school by a certain age. In Washington state that age is 8. In other states that age is 5, 6, or 7.

[Anonymous]

Well, it’s clear no transition rules until July at the earliest.

At this point, 95%+ of roster spots have been filled. Any rules that come out next month or in July will not cause any chaos during the try out period for this upcoming season.

I would not be surprised if the new rules permit clubs to shuffle kids around based on birth month starting in the spring. This could further reduce try out chaos next spring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the last 76 pages have been SY+ guy pushing his agenda and replying to his own posts. Nevertheless, it has put us close to our goal of 1000.

Can't wait for posts from the SY+ Leo& Virgo parent.

I'm not replying to my own posts.

I do think SY+60 is the way to go. There must be others that see its logic as well.

I appreciate all the crazy spam posts fighting against SY+60. The more you go insane the more parents are introduced the the SY+60 concept.

You liking vanilla ice cream and getting mad that other people like chocolate by constantly replying to your own posts on SY plus sized will get us to 2,000!

[Anonymous]

Well US Soccer updated their Immediate Steps Next 60 days statement to nothing, LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well US Soccer updated their Immediate Steps Next 60 days statement to nothing, LOL!

link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the last 76 pages have been SY+ guy pushing his agenda and replying to his own posts. Nevertheless, it has put us close to our goal of 1000.

Can't wait for posts from the SY+ Leo& Virgo parent.

I'm not replying to my own posts.

I do think SY+60 is the way to go. There must be others that see its logic as well.

I appreciate all the crazy spam posts fighting against SY+60. The more you go insane the more parents are introduced the the SY+60 concept.

You liking vanilla ice cream and getting mad that other people like chocolate by constantly replying to your own posts on SY plus sized will get us to 2,000!

I literally stopped posting last night and now theres a bunch more posts about addressing the trapped players that still exist under SY with a single date cutoff.

You on the other hand post like crazy saying the same thing about how great it is to put your head in the sand while responding to your own posts.

Come on, we all see it.

[Anonymous]

https://www.ussoccer.com/ecosystem-review/player-registration

You'll see that the "immediate next steps" section is now gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is MLSN2 allowing biobanding/waivers? Our team has had a kid with a May birthday a year older, but same grade level, practicing with us the last few weeks 🤷

How is that even allowed? Isn't there a date cut-off for biobanding?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.ussoccer.com/ecosystem-review/player-registration

You'll see that the "immediate next steps" section is now gone.

Thank you. The way this has been re-written, it's definitely emphasized that there will be no registration changes in 25/26. Except in California?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.ussoccer.com/ecosystem-review/player-registration

You'll see that the "immediate next steps" section is now gone.

Thank you. The way this has been re-written, it's definitely emphasized that there will be no registration changes in 25/26. Except in California?

Uh oh SY dreamland is running into some snags.

Who could have guessed?

Change a system to get rid of trapped players to a new system with trapped players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.ussoccer.com/ecosystem-review/player-registration

You'll see that the "immediate next steps" section is now gone.

Thank you. The way this has been re-written, it's definitely emphasized that there will be no registration changes in 25/26. Except in California?

Uh oh SY dreamland is running into some snags.

Who could have guessed?

Change a system to get rid of trapped players to a new system with trapped players.

System is being changed to increase participation. No snags.