Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/

All I can do is laugh.

All this is showing is that she does indeed pump in her trailer? She most likely covered up by the time he came. Did he take this long invitation as a free for all?

She said he walked in on her breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is not pumping so his text about being invited in during pumping is irrelevant.

On a separate occasion, his boss, named in the complaint, insisted in walking in on her while she was naked and having body paint removed. She asked that he faced the other way, but found him ogling her breasts.

Baldoni had multiple HR complaints against him on set, not just from Blake, for sexually harassing comments including other members of the cast.

He asked her if ahe watches p*rn, talked about his own p*rn addiction, and asked her if she climaxes together with her husband. Asked her to take her coat off in front of everyone on a bar to see her lacy bra or top.

If you are going to pick apart her complaint, don't cherry pick.

Did you read the article? Variety says it asked Sony how many HR complaints there were and they said 0.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think of the NYT lawsuit?

dumb. Discovery is going to destroy them as it does with a lot of cases. Lively had that federal lawsuit ready to file.

Both of their cases are going to fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think of the NYT lawsuit?

dumb. Discovery is going to destroy them as it does with a lot of cases. Lively had that federal lawsuit ready to file.

If one had a defamation case against The NY Times, one would not file a lawsuit 10 days after the article came out. Nowhere near enough time to prepare a real complaint. This was a way to get their story out. But picking a fight with the NYT is dumb. They are just digging in deeper.

Good point. A majority of their complaint sounds like they're just trying to answer for the accusations. There's nothing that will blow your away as they warned lol. NYT was smart and provided Blake's whole complaint.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/

All I can do is laugh.

All this is showing is that she does indeed pump in her trailer? She most likely covered up by the time he came. Did he take this long invitation as a free for all?

She said he walked in on her breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is not pumping so his text about being invited in during pumping is irrelevant.

On a separate occasion, his boss, named in the complaint, insisted in walking in on her while she was naked and having body paint removed. She asked that he faced the other way, but found him ogling her breasts.

Baldoni had multiple HR complaints against him on set, not just from Blake, for sexually harassing comments including other members of the cast.

He asked her if ahe watches p*rn, talked about his own p*rn addiction, and asked her if she climaxes together with her husband. Asked her to take her coat off in front of everyone on a bar to see her lacy bra or top.

If you are going to pick apart her complaint, don't cherry pick.

Did you read the article? Variety says it asked Sony how many HR complaints there were and they said 0.

This is one of Blake's complaints. Sony said it wasn't their jurisdiction and that it needed to be reported with Wayfarer since they are the production company.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/

All I can do is laugh.

She is vile and I hope both she and her husband become pariahs after this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/

All I can do is laugh.

She is vile and I hope both she and her husband become pariahs after this.

They won't. Justin and the PR agents will.

[Anonymous]

They're trying to bankrupt NYT with the billionaire guy. That's what Peter Thiel and Hulk Hogan did with Gwaker. Expect was Gwaker was wrong for outing Thiel and posting Hulk's video. NYT has a bigger lawyer fund. This will do Justin and the agents any favors. In the end they will still have to answer to the civil rights investigation and now Blake's own lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

One of the biggest things is that Justin is claiming that whole 30 demands and protections for the production was all fabricated. Which is odd as Heath's signature is on it. He's a producer and represented the movie's LLC.

[Anonymous]

I'm on Lively's side here and think Baldoni seems like he sucks, but I think NYT screwed up here. Their article felt off to me, and my sense is that it was fed to NYT by Lively's team to coincide with the complaint coming out. It was too heavy handed and putting Megan Twohey on the byline ensured it got a certain kind of attention. I suspect there was kind of a handshake between the Lively folks and NYT and they didn't go the due diligence they should have in getting Baldoni's side and reporting it neutrally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm on Lively's side here and think Baldoni seems like he sucks, but I think NYT screwed up here. Their article felt off to me, and my sense is that it was fed to NYT by Lively's team to coincide with the complaint coming out. It was too heavy handed and putting Megan Twohey on the byline ensured it got a certain kind of attention. I suspect there was kind of a handshake between the Lively folks and NYT and they didn't go the due diligence they should have in getting Baldoni's side and reporting it neutrally.

I don’t think there’s any evidence that the NYT didn’t do its diligence. I am inclined to side with them based on the current facts we know because I trust them to fact check extensively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2024/film/news/justin-baldoni-sues-new-york-times-blake-lively-allegations-story-1236263099/

All I can do is laugh.

She is vile and I hope both she and her husband become pariahs after this.

Yeah, she's an arrogant a-hole.

[Anonymous]

I've been a BL fan and I guess I'm still a fan of her work. I dont get why she needed to publicly destroy her coworker (and presumably boss? Since he is also director?). I get maybe a quiet lawsuit or mediation but she's dragging him in a very public manner, while also kind of ruining the movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've been a BL fan and I guess I'm still a fan of her work. I dont get why she needed to publicly destroy her coworker (and presumably boss? Since he is also director?). I get maybe a quiet lawsuit or mediation but she's dragging him in a very public manner, while also kind of ruining the movie.

Um did you miss the part where he hired a PR agency that basically destroyed her on the internet all year? I think that ruined the movie which is streaming and available to anyone who wants to watch it at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm on Lively's side here and think Baldoni seems like he sucks, but I think NYT screwed up here. Their article felt off to me, and my sense is that it was fed to NYT by Lively's team to coincide with the complaint coming out. It was too heavy handed and putting Megan Twohey on the byline ensured it got a certain kind of attention. I suspect there was kind of a handshake between the Lively folks and NYT and they didn't go the due diligence they should have in getting Baldoni's side and reporting it neutrally.

I agree for the most part but he's going to lose. He contends the NYT uncritically pushed forward her narrative and cherry picked the facts that supported her. That's probably true. But that's not unlawful. All journalism is like that. They didn’t publish anything untrue, and as a public figure he has an even higher bar to clear. This is just an expensive way to get his story out and legitimize it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm on Lively's side here and think Baldoni seems like he sucks, but I think NYT screwed up here. Their article felt off to me, and my sense is that it was fed to NYT by Lively's team to coincide with the complaint coming out. It was too heavy handed and putting Megan Twohey on the byline ensured it got a certain kind of attention. I suspect there was kind of a handshake between the Lively folks and NYT and they didn't go the due diligence they should have in getting Baldoni's side and reporting it neutrally.

I agree for the most part but he's going to lose. He contends the NYT uncritically pushed forward her narrative and cherry picked the facts that supported her. That's probably true. But that's not unlawful. All journalism is like that. They didn’t publish anything untrue, and as a public figure he has an even higher bar to clear. This is just an expensive way to get his story out and legitimize it.

Nathan's excuse is ridiculous. NYT left off the message where she says she wasn't behind the Dailymail article about Blake being canceled so she should receive damages. Expect NYT never said she was behind that exact article in the first place. Before that NYT showed they were not only planting articles but measuring how other tabs were responding organically.