TSJFC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there's a GA rule against combined age teams? I know we can have guest players play up, but can they fully combine teams for GA? Just curious since it seems like teams will have to be combined to fill out rosters for the upcoming year. I couldn't find what I'm specifically asking by googling so I thought someone may be able to point me to the specific rule

Players from the same club are able to play up on different age groups. I don’t think there is a limit to how many can do that. But there is a rule that a player can only play one game in 24 hours, and since all age groups play on the same day this becomes a problem if you don’t have enough players on game day.

You also have to field a certain number of GA teams across accepted age groups. You can’t just field one team at 2011 and call it a day. It’s still up in the air whether FCV will get booted from GA (source: I’m on the regional council).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there's a GA rule against combined age teams? I know we can have guest players play up, but can they fully combine teams for GA? Just curious since it seems like teams will have to be combined to fill out rosters for the upcoming year. I couldn't find what I'm specifically asking by googling so I thought someone may be able to point me to the specific rule

Players from the same club are able to play up on different age groups. I don’t think there is a limit to how many can do that. But there is a rule that a player can only play one game in 24 hours, and since all age groups play on the same day this becomes a problem if you don’t have enough players on game day.

You also have to field a certain number of GA teams across accepted age groups. You can’t just field one team at 2011 and call it a day. It’s still up in the air whether FCV will get booted from GA (source: I’m on the regional council).

Regional council 😂🤡There is no such thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what is La Bestia FC?

is tsjfc giving up on loudoun?

Another day, another merger. Wonder why they think adding locations when they can't make one successful anymore is a good idea?

No different than buying up coaches, clubs, players, and property. In fact, more meritorious than just writing checks instead of actually earning it yourself with *checks notes* genuine work and honest skills.

They aren't buying anyone, it is merger on paper only. Essentially, they are saying your kids can have pathway to our program and attend our clinics, or we may hold some of our clinics (player and coaching) in your area. It is a promise to open dialogue between the two clubs and share information.

It's akin to Fairfax Union forming partnerships with lots of clubs. It spreads the word of the club to new (potential) members and costs very little to do.

TSJ is creating an Northern Virginia Alliance.

And for those who’ve been swallowing up all the BS shenanigans of NOVA’s DMV elitist and hideous ‘partnerships-mergers-alliances-agreements’ they know that with much less time than VRSC they’ll crush Les Revolutionaries in warp speed time. It’s going to be entertaining to say the least seeing the Leesburg peeps seething with what they thought they crushed taking their piece of the pie.

1/3 TSJ teams finished last in GA last year, 1/2 finished 12 out of 14 and they can’t even find players for those teams this year.

Meanwhile VRSC is fielding almost 4 teams per age group on the girls side. And at least top half of the GA table, but why rub it in?

Adam and Tony are blacklisted from every other club in the area so I guess they have to stick with this stinker.

Because there's nothing to rub in. 1 Rev team finished at the top of the table (Thanks to us), 1 finished slightly above the middle (thanks to us), 1 finished just above the bottom (Heritage Rev players), and 3 finished dead smack in the middle (again thanks to us)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what is La Bestia FC?

is tsjfc giving up on loudoun?

Another day, another merger. Wonder why they think adding locations when they can't make one successful anymore is a good idea?

No different than buying up coaches, clubs, players, and property. In fact, more meritorious than just writing checks instead of actually earning it yourself with *checks notes* genuine work and honest skills.

They aren't buying anyone, it is merger on paper only. Essentially, they are saying your kids can have pathway to our program and attend our clinics, or we may hold some of our clinics (player and coaching) in your area. It is a promise to open dialogue between the two clubs and share information.

It's akin to Fairfax Union forming partnerships with lots of clubs. It spreads the word of the club to new (potential) members and costs very little to do.

TSJ is creating an Northern Virginia Alliance.

And for those who’ve been swallowing up all the BS shenanigans of NOVA’s DMV elitist and hideous ‘partnerships-mergers-alliances-agreements’ they know that with much less time than VRSC they’ll crush Les Revolutionaries in warp speed time. It’s going to be entertaining to say the least seeing the Leesburg peeps seething with what they thought they crushed taking their piece of the pie.

1/3 TSJ teams finished last in GA last year, 1/2 finished 12 out of 14 and they can’t even find players for those teams this year.

Meanwhile VRSC is fielding almost 4 teams per age group on the girls side. And at least top half of the GA table, but why rub it in?

Adam and Tony are blacklisted from every other club in the area so I guess they have to stick with this stinker.

I’ll pretend you’re new or naive.
The reason they’re fielding 4 teams is because they can’t field 6. Now use your brain cells and come up with how much money that is. You think Jim is ok just blowing cash for no return after almost 10 years of VRSC? cute

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what is La Bestia FC?

is tsjfc giving up on loudoun?

Another day, another merger. Wonder why they think adding locations when they can't make one successful anymore is a good idea?

No different than buying up coaches, clubs, players, and property. In fact, more meritorious than just writing checks instead of actually earning it yourself with *checks notes* genuine work and honest skills.

They aren't buying anyone, it is merger on paper only. Essentially, they are saying your kids can have pathway to our program and attend our clinics, or we may hold some of our clinics (player and coaching) in your area. It is a promise to open dialogue between the two clubs and share information.

It's akin to Fairfax Union forming partnerships with lots of clubs. It spreads the word of the club to new (potential) members and costs very little to do.

TSJ is creating an Northern Virginia Alliance.

And for those who’ve been swallowing up all the BS shenanigans of NOVA’s DMV elitist and hideous ‘partnerships-mergers-alliances-agreements’ they know that with much less time than VRSC they’ll crush Les Revolutionaries in warp speed time. It’s going to be entertaining to say the least seeing the Leesburg peeps seething with what they thought they crushed taking their piece of the pie.

1/3 TSJ teams finished last in GA last year, 1/2 finished 12 out of 14 and they can’t even find players for those teams this year.

Meanwhile VRSC is fielding almost 4 teams per age group on the girls side. And at least top half of the GA table, but why rub it in?

Adam and Tony are blacklisted from every other club in the area so I guess they have to stick with this stinker.

Because there's nothing to rub in. 1 Rev team finished at the top of the table (Thanks to us), 1 finished slightly above the middle (thanks to us), 1 finished just above the bottom (Heritage Rev players), and 3 finished dead smack in the middle (again thanks to us)

lol, us?

They don’t play for FCV anymore and never did. They played for Christian, Bobby, and Eric.

And whoa - they followed them where they went!

[Anonymous]

It turns out CC is not as good a coach without BP and BP is not doing very well either. Ed got demoted and that speaks for itself. He’s a terrible parent coach who made buddies with others who protected him. Now he’s promoting his players that don’t deserve promotion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if there's a GA rule against combined age teams? I know we can have guest players play up, but can they fully combine teams for GA? Just curious since it seems like teams will have to be combined to fill out rosters for the upcoming year. I couldn't find what I'm specifically asking by googling so I thought someone may be able to point me to the specific rule

Players from the same club are able to play up on different age groups. I don’t think there is a limit to how many can do that. But there is a rule that a player can only play one game in 24 hours, and since all age groups play on the same day this becomes a problem if you don’t have enough players on game day.

You also have to field a certain number of GA teams across accepted age groups. You can’t just field one team at 2011 and call it a day. It’s still up in the air whether FCV will get booted from GA (source: I’m on the regional council).

Up in the air? Shouldn't that have been decided before conference announcements? Even NCSL required applications by June 30.

Geez, imagine you are a TSJFC player / family and you find out your club has no league.
Could that finally lead to AB's demise?

[Anonymous]

This entire thread is pathetic. So many accustations. So much mud slinging. What ever happened to if you don't have something nice to say keep your mouth shut? I can't read a single post on here without getting the feeling the poster has an agenda. There is no decorum here. Should we want every club to be successful? At the core we are talking about kids soccer.

[Anonymous]

Its TSJ or TSJFC if you need to work out your fingers. FCV is DEAD!

[Anonymous]

Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

Begging for goalies on the boys side which is laughable. If they developed their boy's goalies and actually played them last year, they wouldn't have all left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

Begging for goalies on the boys side which is laughable. If they developed their boy's goalies and actually played them last year, they wouldn't have all left.

We are new to one of the MLSN2 boys teams. A little surprising to see that email about supplemental tryouts. Makes it look like we are desperate for more players but that's not the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

Begging for goalies on the boys side which is laughable. If they developed their boy's goalies and actually played them last year, they wouldn't have all left.

We are new to one of the MLSN2 boys teams. A little surprising to see that email about supplemental tryouts. Makes it look like we are desperate for more players but that's not the case.

Yeah, I wouldn't read into it that way (they are desperate for players). When a club holds supplemental tryouts, it is a good way to gain talent outside of the club and get kids to transfer after the trouts have occurred. Our club held them and gained kids from some competing clubs also, even though our rosters were seemingly set...we just made room for 2 more players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

Begging for goalies on the boys side which is laughable. If they developed their boy's goalies and actually played them last year, they wouldn't have all left.

We are new to one of the MLSN2 boys teams. A little surprising to see that email about supplemental tryouts. Makes it look like we are desperate for more players but that's not the case.

Yeah, I wouldn't read into it that way (they are desperate for players). When a club holds supplemental tryouts, it is a good way to gain talent outside of the club and get kids to transfer after the trouts have occurred. Our club held them and gained kids from some competing clubs also, even though our rosters were seemingly set...we just made room for 2 more players.

In other words the talent on the team is not good (but not your kid of course) and they want to upgrade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still looking for MLSN boys too at all ages-- got a blast email tonight

Begging for goalies on the boys side which is laughable. If they developed their boy's goalies and actually played them last year, they wouldn't have all left.

We are new to one of the MLSN2 boys teams. A little surprising to see that email about supplemental tryouts. Makes it look like we are desperate for more players but that's not the case.

Yeah, I wouldn't read into it that way (they are desperate for players). When a club holds supplemental tryouts, it is a good way to gain talent outside of the club and get kids to transfer after the trouts have occurred. Our club held them and gained kids from some competing clubs also, even though our rosters were seemingly set...we just made room for 2 more players.

There is always room for more paying customers. Club needs them to stop losing money.