Liman issued a decision with respect to Wallace knowing he had no jurisdiction over him, then dismissed him after the discovery had been turned over. He should never have decided the motion for a protective order and transferred it to a Texas court. This is actually unethical judicial behavior. |
Agreed. Where do you think the unethical behavior is coming from — his connections to Gottlieb? |
You can’t just make up things and call them your “theory.” No reason to believe Jed didn’t stop. People HATE Blake, no smear campaign needed. |
I think that is the most likely. |
I saw a fun theory that Liman's brother Doug lost a case to Bryan Freedman but I could not verify whether that was true. All I can find is they were both involved in a suit over Amazon's Roadhouse, but they don't appear to be diect adversaries. |
Comment from Reddit, so take with a grain of salt, but I thought it was interesting:
“I had my lunch with a local judge, and he believes Liman is extremely biased for Lively parties, to the point of throwing the case for her. I was shocked, honestly, that he agreed with me. He stated that federal judges are the least accountable judges in the judicial system!” |
Liman has already gotten in trouble for not recusing himself in a case in which he had a financial interest via his wife. One would think that would have improved his behavior. It apparently not. There’s a reason he’s a Trump appointee. |
Let's see if Gottlieb goes on TMZ tomorrow to say he will be refiling all of these claims against Wallace AND MORE* in two weeks, and then doesn't file a thing, actually. And then sends a google doc to Popcorn Planet a day after the deadline passed saying he's considering all the best options. Maybe Baldoni supporters will fall in love with Gottlieb then!
* which he's not allowed to do. But, that's the point. |
Take the L, babe. |
I am not a conspiracy theorist at all, and I don’t think there’s a conspiracy. Just bias |
First (small) movement on the google stuff on the docket. A pro so content creator filed an anonymous motion to quash. Liman orders they cannot proceed anonymously and must either file under their name or request leave to file anonymously with an explanation. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.428.0.pdf
I hope the person is able to file that motion and not have their name and personal information blasted to the world, which would defeat the entire purpose of the motion to quash, because then the info would go the entire world, not just Lively. |
Babe, I can't tell from this board whether this is an L for Lively because Liman dismissed the claims or whether it's a huge win for Lively because it should be dismissed with prejudice except clearly Liman is so terribly biased in her favor. Let me know when you decide lol. |
I mean, I kind of can? It's the Internet and people speculate? Granted, if I were thinking about trying to file my little theory with the judge based on something someone told me that they heard from someone else who heard it from someone else, probably any loser off the street would know not to try that on -- oh, wait -- |
The person who wrote the motion is doing a livestream: https://www.youtube.com/live/46mhC_1zMcY It's funny, I generally can't stand the pro-Baldoni content churning but I'm so rooting for them now. I'd never be watching one of these, lol. Kind of a Streisand effect. |
Liman granted Gottlieb an emergency hearing tonight at 5:30.
https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1945598664140816556 |