Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

PP is misusing the word “convict” even if it’s in quotes.

In what other industry would BK get the most desirable job, for life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP is misusing the word “convict” even if it’s in quotes.

In what other industry would BK get the most desirable job, for life.

Well, you know how Trumpkins say that federal employees are terrible. Guess they are right about this one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I keep imagining Justice Roberts calling flake, manchin, and Sasse to tell them to vote down, we the justices dont want him here.

That would be too political. Roberts could just ask Kav to recuse himself a lot, so it's like he's not there.

I didn’t think Roberts could actually ask them to recuse.

It is upto Kavanaugh to decide whether he should recuse himself from cases. Roberts can’t make him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP is misusing the word “convict” even if it’s in quotes.

In what other industry would BK get the most desirable job, for life.

Yes. I did put it in quotes. He has been “convicted” in the court of public opinion by those of you who “believe her.”
I don’t believe it is appropriate to eliminate a very qualified judge from this position because of false allegations. It is disturbing that so many think that unsubstantiated, uncorroborated allegations should do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still astounded that so many people “believer her” despite the fact that there was absolutely NO evidence implicating his guilt. Not one shred.

In fact, the evidence that was presented actually exonerated him.

The one thing this vote shows is that there are still people in this country who believe that in order to “convict” a person of a crime, there needs to be evidence of that crime. There was none.

I guess people were so determined to derail this nominee that they would believe anything.

Which evidence was that?

The statements of those who SHE said were present that stated they had no knowledge of any such party. And, the fact that her best friend said she didn’t know Kavanaugh.
Add to that the fact that she could not remember pretty significant details - like the date, the place, getting to and getting home from the place she couldn’t remember - yet, she was able to remember other “random” details like she drank one beer and remembered running into the street thinking she got away. It makes no sense.

+1 I agree

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP is misusing the word “convict” even if it’s in quotes.

In what other industry would BK get the most desirable job, for life.

Yes. I did put it in quotes. He has been “convicted” in the court of public opinion by those of you who “believe her.”
I don’t believe it is appropriate to eliminate a very qualified judge from this position because of false allegations. It is disturbing that so many think that unsubstantiated, uncorroborated allegations should do so.

+1 They simply don't want him and thought it would end with his withdrawal. They're also upset that Trump has been able to nominate 2 SC justices and may get to do another one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense?

Please tell us about your post-trauma psychology credentials.

And there was plenty of potential corroboration. The FBI wasn’t allowed to talk to dozens of people.

She could have presented this “evidence” at her hearing. She could have submitted the statements, the therapy notes, the polygraph, and everything else she had to the SJC. But, she didn’t.
So, we have no evidence that corroborates her claims.
What we do have is her dear friend/retired FBI agent attempting to sway the testimony of Leland. That is pretty damning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Sad day when he is voted in. How infuriating is it to see the environment for my young daughters headed backwards in time.

I’m sure they’ll appreciate a country where a great woman took a brave stand for the presumption of innocence.

+ 1 million

Mmmmhmm. Presumption of innocence with a sham investigation. We see you.

We see you, too.

Why are you happy about it? Is owning the libs worth tearing the country apart? If this were a democratic nominee you would've screamed bloody murder and you know it. That's why I am not casting another vote for GOP. The pure hatred of the "others," and forgetting the others are your family, your neighbors, your friends.

PP here. I wasn't trying to mock anyone. I was responding to the other poster's post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Sad day when he is voted in. How infuriating is it to see the environment for my young daughters headed backwards in time.

I’m sure they’ll appreciate a country where a great woman took a brave stand for the presumption of innocence.

+ 1 million

No sorry my daughters have been groped by drunken frat boys and do not appreciate a country that elevates such dickish men to the highest level of power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP is misusing the word “convict” even if it’s in quotes.

In what other industry would BK get the most desirable job, for life.

Yes. I did put it in quotes. He has been “convicted” in the court of public opinion by those of you who “believe her.”
I don’t believe it is appropriate to eliminate a very qualified judge from this position because of false allegations. It is disturbing that so many think that unsubstantiated, uncorroborated allegations should do so.

False should be in quotes. How do you know? Were you there?

Be consistent.

He is a deeply flawed nominee. You’re acting like there are no other judges out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As I look at all the insults to one another on this thread and to the public figures, I am reminded of the quote from a parable of Jesus: “But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person.” In our speech to each other, even anonymously, we should not become what we hate. Just speaking our hatred aloud defiles us.

Newt Gingrich popped the air out of that balloon decades ago. And now we have president toilet mouth to thank him for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Sad day when he is voted in. How infuriating is it to see the environment for my young daughters headed backwards in time.

I’m sure they’ll appreciate a country where a great woman took a brave stand for the presumption of innocence.

+ 1 million

No sorry my daughters have been groped by drunken frat boys and do not appreciate a country that elevates such dickish men to the highest level of power.

Brave woman? More like political pawn. What did McConnell say to her at lunch?

This “presumption of innocence” is so tired. This was not a trial. This was a job interview.

BK couldn’t get a job at Burger King after his performance last Thursday.

[Anonymous]

No one said they had to vote for him if the FBI report stated their was no cooberation in the narrow investigation. If a senator did not want to give a vote to kavanaugh he didn't have to. No one should have been forced to vote for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins was the grownup in the room—just when her country needed her intervention.

I’m sure she’ll be celebrating when R v W gets overturned, back home in Maine where she’ll be permanently once she gets voted out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Best new nickname for Kavanaugh (courtesy of Bill Maher):

Schlitz Kavanaugh

Let's make it go viral!

Wouldn’t Guinness kavanaugh be more appropriate?