Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

I wanted to believe he's not biased, but he clearly is. I wonder if Baldoni could/should have hired a co-law firm with more pedigree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.



And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

Right, that’s why he’s biased towards the lawyers who filed the sham lawsuit, and lied for three days about whether they issued subpoenas to google.

[Anonymous]

How much do you think Justin's and Blake's legal bills are each month? Rough estimate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much do you think Justin's and Blake's legal bills are each month? Rough estimate.

We may find out when they file their molions for attorneys fees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much do you think Justin's and Blake's legal bills are each month? Rough estimate.

Blake’s is about 10 times as much, they file so many more motions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

Right, that’s why he’s biased towards the lawyers who filed the sham lawsuit, and lied for three days about whether they issued subpoenas to google.

When did Blake's lawyers lie about subpoenas to Google? I didn't see that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

lol. YES! Thank you both!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

Right, that’s why he’s biased towards the lawyers who filed the sham lawsuit, and lied for three days about whether they issued subpoenas to google.

When did Blake's lawyers lie about subpoenas to Google? I didn't see that.

You would have, if the pro-Lively user didn't clog this thread with posts about Freedman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias.

Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.

Sure, Jan.

The above is definitely right. JB’s lawyer tried to talk about stuff that wasn’t on the agenda for this hearing. Of course he was shut down. When you pretend otherwise, you just come across as ridiculous.

Liman is biased in favor of lawyers who follow rules and make cogent arguments that actually relate to the matter at hand.

THE INJUSTICE.

Right, that’s why he’s biased towards the lawyers who filed the sham lawsuit, and lied for three days about whether they issued subpoenas to google.

When did Blake's lawyers lie about subpoenas to Google? I didn't see that.

This past weekend.