Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th. Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work. Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!) The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.[/quote] And yet he let Blake’s lawyer drone on and on. Doesn’t even attempt to hide his bias. [/quote] Bender was only directly addressing the specific questions Liman asked her. She was trying to explain why they wanted the extra time, and then trying to work out the details of the compromise that. She wasn't, like, bringing up the outstanding film requests or talking about why they shouldn't turn over Lively's financial records etc. She was ordering items that were on Judge Liman's menu, and Fritz was attempting to order items that were off menu, and Liman was explaining he didn't have time for off menu items today.[/quote] Sure, Jan.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics