Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However this case ends, Blake’s career and likely Ryan’s is now over. They bought themselves years and years of negative publicity going after the content creators. And bought is the appropriate verb as they are paying their own lawyers millions to destroy their reputations. Can’t see the forest for the trees. Two idiots.

No. If Reynolds career was over -- he would be fine as he is likely worth just under a billion dollars. But this will have no impact whatsoever on him. Not even a speed bump. Also Lively will be fine. Most people do not follow this. Most know nothing about it. She won the general public PR battle for those that do. Studios will be happy to use her as she is bank; no impact. No one cares ever about content creators. They never have and never will. Studios hate them so probably love this. This is not a bad day for them. Baldoni is the one that is done. No studio will back him again. Even if he is right and did nothing wrong he is not worth the hassle. Lively is.

The general public has backed Baldoni, not Lively. This is the most delusional comment in the thread.

Agree, especially saying social media is irrelevant. It’s probably the same person who didn’t have a TikTok account and thinks no one uses Signal.

You are in a bubble. The general public is not following this and could care less about the outcome or the allegations. To the general public the only thing that sticks is that Baldoni abused her. That is all that normal people will remember.

Keep dreaming, the negativity towards Blake is everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However this case ends, Blake’s career and likely Ryan’s is now over. They bought themselves years and years of negative publicity going after the content creators. And bought is the appropriate verb as they are paying their own lawyers millions to destroy their reputations. Can’t see the forest for the trees. Two idiots.

No. If Reynolds career was over -- he would be fine as he is likely worth just under a billion dollars. But this will have no impact whatsoever on him. Not even a speed bump. Also Lively will be fine. Most people do not follow this. Most know nothing about it. She won the general public PR battle for those that do. Studios will be happy to use her as she is bank; no impact. No one cares ever about content creators. They never have and never will. Studios hate them so probably love this. This is not a bad day for them. Baldoni is the one that is done. No studio will back him again. Even if he is right and did nothing wrong he is not worth the hassle. Lively is.

Dream on, the hate on social media for her is, in fact, organic and well earned. She’s doneso.

Social media matters not at all to anything. Not sure why you think it does. Studios love her. Sony would back her again right now.

The first sentence confirms that you are old and clueless.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone see the cringy tik toks Blake released to support her new drink flavors? Another miss, one where she is “instructing” the waiter how to pour her drink. But it does illustrate her total lack of self awareness about how off putting she is.

[Anonymous]

I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

[Anonymous]

Daily Mail on the content creator subpoenas. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14907497/blake-lively-legal-blitz-pro-Baldoni-youtubers-whistleblowers.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However this case ends, Blake’s career and likely Ryan’s is now over. They bought themselves years and years of negative publicity going after the content creators. And bought is the appropriate verb as they are paying their own lawyers millions to destroy their reputations. Can’t see the forest for the trees. Two idiots.

No. If Reynolds career was over -- he would be fine as he is likely worth just under a billion dollars. But this will have no impact whatsoever on him. Not even a speed bump. Also Lively will be fine. Most people do not follow this. Most know nothing about it. She won the general public PR battle for those that do. Studios will be happy to use her as she is bank; no impact. No one cares ever about content creators. They never have and never will. Studios hate them so probably love this. This is not a bad day for them. Baldoni is the one that is done. No studio will back him again. Even if he is right and did nothing wrong he is not worth the hassle. Lively is.

The general public has backed Baldoni, not Lively. This is the most delusional comment in the thread.

Agree, especially saying social media is irrelevant. It’s probably the same person who didn’t have a TikTok account and thinks no one uses Signal.

You are in a bubble. The general public is not following this and could care less about the outcome or the allegations. To the general public the only thing that sticks is that Baldoni abused her. That is all that normal people will remember.

Keep dreaming, the negativity towards Blake is everywhere.

It is nowhere. People do not care about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However this case ends, Blake’s career and likely Ryan’s is now over. They bought themselves years and years of negative publicity going after the content creators. And bought is the appropriate verb as they are paying their own lawyers millions to destroy their reputations. Can’t see the forest for the trees. Two idiots.

No. If Reynolds career was over -- he would be fine as he is likely worth just under a billion dollars. But this will have no impact whatsoever on him. Not even a speed bump. Also Lively will be fine. Most people do not follow this. Most know nothing about it. She won the general public PR battle for those that do. Studios will be happy to use her as she is bank; no impact. No one cares ever about content creators. They never have and never will. Studios hate them so probably love this. This is not a bad day for them. Baldoni is the one that is done. No studio will back him again. Even if he is right and did nothing wrong he is not worth the hassle. Lively is.

The general public has backed Baldoni, not Lively. This is the most delusional comment in the thread.

Agree, especially saying social media is irrelevant. It’s probably the same person who didn’t have a TikTok account and thinks no one uses Signal.

You are in a bubble. The general public is not following this and could care less about the outcome or the allegations. To the general public the only thing that sticks is that Baldoni abused her. That is all that normal people will remember.

Keep dreaming, the negativity towards Blake is everywhere.

It is nowhere. People do not care about this.

You keep saying this, but it doesn’t make it so, sorry.

[Anonymous]

Blake got half the document extension she requested, until August 15 (she asked for September 30) but all motions to compel due only a week later. That’s tight dates for all the third party discovery Blake is seeking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:However this case ends, Blake’s career and likely Ryan’s is now over. They bought themselves years and years of negative publicity going after the content creators. And bought is the appropriate verb as they are paying their own lawyers millions to destroy their reputations. Can’t see the forest for the trees. Two idiots.

No. If Reynolds career was over -- he would be fine as he is likely worth just under a billion dollars. But this will have no impact whatsoever on him. Not even a speed bump. Also Lively will be fine. Most people do not follow this. Most know nothing about it. She won the general public PR battle for those that do. Studios will be happy to use her as she is bank; no impact. No one cares ever about content creators. They never have and never will. Studios hate them so probably love this. This is not a bad day for them. Baldoni is the one that is done. No studio will back him again. Even if he is right and did nothing wrong he is not worth the hassle. Lively is.

The general public has backed Baldoni, not Lively. This is the most delusional comment in the thread.

Agree, especially saying social media is irrelevant. It’s probably the same person who didn’t have a TikTok account and thinks no one uses Signal.

You are in a bubble. The general public is not following this and could care less about the outcome or the allegations. To the general public the only thing that sticks is that Baldoni abused her. That is all that normal people will remember.

Keep dreaming, the negativity towards Blake is everywhere.

It is nowhere. People do not care about this.

You keep saying this, but it doesn’t make it so, sorry.

+10000 this is Blake supporter’s new schtick I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

How did you listen to hearing if was a call?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake got half the document extension she requested, until August 15 (she asked for September 30) but all motions to compel due only a week later. That’s tight dates for all the third party discovery Blake is seeking.

Thank you to anyone who summarized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just listened to the hearing and they came up with a compromise where all discovery related to requests that have already been issued will be due by the already proposed date of July 25th.

Lively had wanted another deadline for add-on discovery of September 30th. Liman was not keen on that, and everyone agreed to a later discovery deadline of Friday, August 15 for additional discovery that is just being propounded now, especially on third parties. So they will have to get those requests in right away to make that work.

Bender asked for permission to file for additional discovery from info learned at depositions if they can show good cause, and Liman said hey yes but you will have to follow what the Rules say in showing good cause etc. (FURRY PUPPET STUDIO HELLO AGAIN!)

The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

Freedman was reportedly on the call but did not say a word afaict.

How did you listen to hearing if was a call?

There was a dial in posted on the docket. The attorneys were on a video call, which dial ins could hear the audio version of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most amusing part of the hearing for me was when Liman asked Fritz whether he could live with these deadlines and Fritz said yes and then started going off on a tangent re the Google subpoenas and Liman interrupted him and explained there would be another more appropriate time where all the parties would provide their own versions of the facts as they wanted the judge to understand them but right now this was really just a scheduling conference. Like, Liman's version of "Sir, this is a Wendy's." lol

LMFAOOOOLOLOLOL

[Anonymous]

There is a great summary on the Lawsuits Reddit sub, much more detailed. One other thing was that Wayfarer’s attorney said their productions were complete and there were no other outstanding complaints about them except they were still getting all the film turned over and expected to finish that today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a great summary on the Lawsuits Reddit sub, much more detailed. One other thing was that Wayfarer’s attorney said their productions were complete and there were no other outstanding complaints about them except they were still getting all the film turned over and expected to finish that today.

Sounds like BL’s depo is on!